Skip to main content
Log in

Flood hazard mapping using synthesis hydraulic and geomorphic properties at watershed scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of natural phenomena such as floods has caused serious consequences for human societies. The simulation of flood hazard maps and its depth in a river is one of the most complex processes in hydrology. In fact both geomorphological and hydraulic procedures for deriving the flood hazard maps and depth are imperfect at watershed scale. In this study, a combination of both procedures, using a probabilistic approach is used. Flood inundation maps for 2-, 10-, 25-,50- and 100-return period floods using flood routine within HEC-RAS in combination of Arc-GIS and topographic wetness index (TWI) map were produced. TWI threshold was identified using a maximum likelihood method in order to produce flood prone areas and calibrated over the reach of Zirab City. The correlation between TWI threshold and the flood depth was carried out and simple linear regression developed for various return periods. The resulting regression model is used in order to create flood hazard maps with various return periods at watershed scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge BN, Garrett JM (1973) Roughness coefficients for stream channels in Arizona. US Geological Survey

  • Bertolo P, Wieczorek G (2005) Calibration of numerical models for small debris flows in Yosemite Valley, California, USA. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:993–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan WL (1956) Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients. Agric Eng 37:473–475

    Google Scholar 

  • De Risi R, Jalayer F, De Paola F (2015) Meso-scale hazard zoning of potentially flood prone areas. J Hydrol 527:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degiorgis M, Gnecco G, Gorni S, Roth G, Sanguineti M, Taramasso AC (2012) Classifiers for the detection of flood-prone areas using remote sensed elevation data. J Hydrol 470:302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degiorgis M, Gnecco G, Gorni S, Roth G, Sanguineti M, Taramasso AC (2013) Flood hazard assessment via threshold binary classifiers: case study of the Tanaro river basin. Irrig Drain 62:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horritt M, Bates P (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter NM, Bates PD, Horritt MS, Wilson MD (2007) Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorphology 90:208–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalayer F et al (2014) Probabilistic GIS-based method for delineation of urban flooding risk hotspots. Nat Hazards 73:975–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby MJ (1975) Hydrograph modelling strategies. Department of Geography, University of Leeds

  • Levy JK (2005) Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G-F, Xiang X-Y, Tong Y-Y, Wang H-M (2013) Impact assessment of urbanization on flood risk in the Yangtze River Delta. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1683–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Wu W, Wang J, Che Z, Xie Y (2016) Simulating and mapping the risk of surge floods in multiple typhoon scenarios: a case study of Yuhuan County, Zhejiang Province, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-016-1238-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfreda S, Di Leo M, Sole A (2011) Detection of flood-prone areas using digital elevation models. J Hydrol Eng 16:781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfreda S, Nardi F, Samela C, Grimaldi S, Taramasso AC, Roth G, Sole A (2014) Investigation on the use of geomorphic approaches for the delineation of flood prone areas. J Hydrol 517:863–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi F, Vivoni ER, Grimaldi S (2006) Investigating a floodplain scaling relation using a hydrogeomorphic delineation method. Water Resour Res 42:W09409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi F, Biscarini C, Di Francesco S, Manciola P, Ubertini L (2013) Comparing a Large-Scale DEM-Based Floodplain Delineation Algorithm with Standard Flood Maps: the Tiber River Basin Case Study. Irrig Drain 62:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’brien J, Julien P, Fullerton W (1993) Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. J Hydraul Eng 119:244–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Beven K, Horritt M, Blazkova S (2005) Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. J Hydrol 302:46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patro S, Chatterjee C, Mohanty S, Singh R, Raghuwanshi N (2009) Flood inundation modeling using MIKE FLOOD and remote sensing data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Arya D, Goel N, Dhamy AP (2010) Design flow and stage computations in the Teesta River, Bangladesh, using frequency analysis and MIKE 11 modeling. J Hydrol Eng 16:176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tate EC, Maidment DR (1999) Floodplain mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS. University of Texas at Austin, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2015) Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29:1149–1165. doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend PA, Walsh SJ (1998) Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorphology 21:295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Townsend RD, Daneshfar B (2006) Applying the HEC-RAS model and GIS techniques in river network floodplain delineation. Can J Civ Eng 33:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Q, Zhou J, Zhou C, Song L, Guo J (2013) Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:525–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Zirab municipality for providing the DEM of Zirab reach. Finally, the authors would like to appreciate unknown reviewers for their useful reviews and comments on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Vafakhah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motevalli, A., Vafakhah, M. Flood hazard mapping using synthesis hydraulic and geomorphic properties at watershed scale. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30, 1889–1900 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1305-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1305-8

Keywords

Navigation