Advertisement

Let-It-Rain: a web application for stochastic point rainfall generation at ungaged basins and its applicability in runoff and flood modeling

  • Dongkyun KimEmail author
  • Huidae Cho
  • Christian Onof
  • Minha Choi
Original Paper

Abstract

We present a web application named Let-It-Rain that is able to generate a 1-h temporal resolution synthetic rainfall time series using the modified Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulse (MBLRP) model, a type of Poisson stochastic rainfall generator. Let-It-Rain, which can be accessed through the web address http://www.LetItRain.info, adopts a web-based framework combining ArcGIS Server from server side for parameter value dissemination and JavaScript from client side to implement the MBLRP model. This enables any desktop and mobile end users with internet access and web browser to obtain the synthetic rainfall time series at any given location at which the parameter regionalization work has been completed (currently the contiguous United States and Republic of Korea) with only a few mouse clicks. Let-It-Rain shows satisfactory performance in its ability to reproduce observed rainfall mean, variance, auto-correlation, and probability of zero rainfall at hourly through daily accumulation levels. It also shows a reasonably good performance in reproducing watershed runoff depth and peak flow. We expect that Let-It-Rain can stimulate the uncertainty analysis of hydrologic variables across the world.

Keywords

Poisson cluster rainfall simulation Modified Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulse model Neyman–Scott rectangular pulse model Rainfall disaggregation Rainfall downscaling Climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Research Laboratory Program (50 %, Grant ID: NRF-2015041523) and by the Basic Science Research Program (50 %, Grant ID: NRF-2013R1A1A1011676) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning.

References

  1. Bathurst JC, Moretti G, El-Hames A, Moaven-Hashemi A, Burton A (2005) Scenario modelling of basin-scale, shallow landslide sediment yield, Valsassina, Italian Southern Alps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(2):189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkinshaw SJ, Bathurst JC, Iroumé A, Palacios H (2011) The effect of forest cover on peak flow and sediment discharge—an integrated field and modelling study in central–southern Chile. Hydrol Process 25(8):1284–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blazkov S, Beven K (1997) Flood frequency prediction for data limited catchments in the Czech Republic using a stochastic rainfall model and TOPMODEL. J Hydrol 195(1):256–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton A et al (2008) RainSim: a spatial–temporal stochastic rainfall modelling system. Environ Model Softw 23(12):1356–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton A, Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Kilsby CG (2010) Downscaling transient climate change using a Neyman–Scott Rectangular Pulses stochastic rainfall model. J Hydrol 381(1):18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calver A, Stewart E, Goodsell G (2009) Comparative analysis of statistical and catchment modelling approaches to river flood frequency estimation. J Flood Risk Manag 2(1):24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camici S, Tarpanelli A, Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T (2011) Design soil moisture estimation by comparing continuous and storm-based rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour Res 47(5):W05527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen X, Ye X, Carroll M, Li Y (2014) Online Flood Information System: REST-based Web Service. Int J Appl Geosp Res 5(2):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho H, Kim D, Olivera F, Guikema SD (2011) Enhanced speciation in particle swarm optimization for multi-modal problems. Eur J Oper Res 213(1):15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chun KP, Wheater HS, Onof C (2013) Comparison of drought projections using two UK weather generators. Hydrol Sci J 58(2):295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowden JR, Watkins DW Jr, Mihelcic JR (2008) Stochastic rainfall modeling in West Africa: parsimonious approaches for domestic rainwater harvesting assessment. J Hydrol 361(1):64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowpertwait PS (1994) A generalized point process model for rainfall. Proc R Soc Lond A 447(1929):23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowpertwait PS (1995) A generalized spatial-temporal model of rainfall based on a clustered point process. Proc R Soc Lond A 450(1938):163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowpertwait PS (1998) A Poisson-cluster model of rainfall: some high-order moments and extreme values. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol 454, no. 1971. The Royal Society, pp 885–898Google Scholar
  15. Cowpertwait PSP, O’Connell PE, Metcalfe AV, Mawdsley JA (1996a) Stochastic point process modelling of rainfall. I. Single-site fitting and validation. J Hydrol 175(1):17–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowpertwait PSP, O’Connell PE, Metcalfe AV, Mawdsley JA (1996b) Stochastic point process modelling of rainfall. II. Regionalisation and disaggregation. J Hydrol 175(1):47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fatichi S, Ivanov VY, Caporali E (2011) Simulation of future climate scenarios with a weather generator. Adv Water Resour 34(4):448–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fatichi S, Rimkus S, Burlando P, Bordoy R, Molnar P (2013) Elevational dependence of climate change impacts on water resources in an Alpine catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Dis 10(3):3743–3794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glasbey CA, Cooper G, McGechan MB (1995) Disaggregation of daily rainfall by conditional simulation from a point-process model. J Hydrol 165(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green H, Ampt GA (1912) Studies on soil physics: part II—the permeability of an ideal soil to air and water. J Agric Sci 5(01):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanaish IS, Ibrahim K, Jemain AA (2013) On the applicability of Bartlett Lewis Model: with reference to missing data. MATEMATIKA 29:53–65Google Scholar
  22. Islam S, Entekhabi D, Bras RL, Rodriguez‐Iturbe I (1990) Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis for the modified Bartlett‐Lewis rectangular pulses model of rainfall. J Geophys Res 95(D3):2093–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kay AL, Jones RG (2012) Comparison of the use of alternative UKCP09 products for modelling the impacts of climate change on flood frequency. Clim Change 114(2):211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khaliq M, Cunnane C (1996) Modelling point rainfall occrrences with the modified Bartlett-Lewis rectangular pulses model. J Hydrol 180:109–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kigobe M, McIntyre N, Wheater H, Chandler R (2011) Multi-site stochastic modelling of daily rainfall in Uganda. Hydrol Sci J 56(1):17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim D, Olivera F (2012) Relative importance of the different rainfall statistics in the calibration of stochastic rainfall generation models. J Hydrol Eng 17(3):368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim D, Olivera F, Cho H, Socolofsky SA (2013a) Regionalization of the modified Bartlett-Lewis Rectangular Pulse stochastic rainfall model. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 24(3):421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim D, Olivera F, Cho H (2013b) Effect of the inter-annual variability of rainfall statistics on stochastically generated rainfall time series: part 1. Impact on peak and extreme rainfall values. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 27(7):1601–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim D, Olivera F, Cho H, Lee SO (2013c) Effect of the inter-annual variability of rainfall statistics on stochastically generated rainfall time series: part 2. Impact on watershed response variables. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 27(7):1611–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, D., Kwon, H. H., Lee, S. O., & Kim, S. (2014). Regionalization of the Modified Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulse stochastic rainfall model across the Korean Peninsula. J Hydro-environ Res. Available online 8 December 2014, ISSN 1570-6443.  10.1016/j.jher.2014.10.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570644314000823
  31. NRCS (1985) National engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology, natural resources conservation service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Olsson J, Burlando P (2002) Reproduction of temporal scaling by a rectangular pulses rainfall model. Hydrol Process 16(3):611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Onof C, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K (2009) Quantification of anticipated future changes in high resolution design rainfall for urban areas. Atmos Res 92(3):350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Onof C, Wheater HS (1993) Modelling of British rainfall using a random parameter Bartlett–Lewis rectangular pulse model. J Hydrol 149(1):67–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Onof C, Chandler RE, Kakou A, Northrop P, Wheater HS, Isham V (2000) Rainfall modelling using Poisson-cluster processes: a review of developments. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 14(6):384–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. J Appl Phys 1(5):318–333Google Scholar
  37. Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Cox DR, Isham V (1987) Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 410(1839):269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Cox DR, Isham V (1988) A point process model for rainfall: further developments. Proc R Soc Lond A 417(1853):283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosner B (1983) Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25(2):165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan X, Di L, Deng M, Chen A, Sun Z, Huang C, Shao Y, Ye X (2015) Agent-and cloud-supported geospatial service aggregation for flood response. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 2(4):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tucker GE, Bras RL (2000) A stochastic approach to modeling the role of rainfall variability in drainage basin evolution. Water Resour Res 36(7):1953–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Visser A, Kroes J, van Vliet MTH, Blenkinsop S, Fowler HJ, Broers HP (2012) Climate change impacts on the leaching of a heavy metal contamination in a small lowland catchment. J Contam Hydrol 127(1):47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang Y, Wang T, Ye X, Zhu J, Lee J (2015) Using social media for emergency response and urban sustainability: a case study of the 2012 Beijing rainstorm. Sustainability 8(1):25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wheater HS, Chandler RE, Onof CJ, Isham VS, Bellone E, Yang C, Lekkas D, Lourmas G, Segond ML (2005) Spatial-temporal rainfall modelling for flood risk estimation. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 19(6):403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou Q, Mikkelsen PS, Halsnæs K, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K (2012) Framework for economic pluvial flood risk assessment considering climate change effects and adaptation benefits. J Hydrol 414:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongkyun Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Huidae Cho
    • 2
  • Christian Onof
    • 3
  • Minha Choi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringHongik UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.DewberryAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringImperial CollegeLondonUK
  4. 4.Water Resources and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Department of Water Resources, Graduate School of Water ResourcesSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations