Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecosystem health assessment based on DPSIRM framework and health distance model in Nansi Lake, China

  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As lake ecosystem assessment is the foundation to achieve lake monitoring, environmental management and ecological restoration, a new concept of lake ecosystem health and driving force-pressure-state-impact-response-management framework was proposed to find out the causal relationship of the system and health distance model was taken to represent the health level of ecosystem. An assessment indicator system comprised of water quality, ecological and socio-economic criteria was established. The evaluation models were applied for the assessment of the ecosystem health level of a typical lake, Nansi Lake, China. Depends on the values of health distance, the heath level was described as 5°: very healthy, healthy, general healthy, sub-healthy and diseased. Using field investigation data and statistic data within the theory and applied models, the results of comprehensive assessment show that: (1) the health distances of water quality indicators, ecological indicators, socio-economic indicators and comprehensive health distance were 0.3989, 0.2495, 0.4983 and 0.4362, respectively. The health level was in general healthy condition. Ecological indicators were in healthy condition, which indicate that the stability was high. The distance of water quality had shown a tendency to approach general healthy level. As the health distance of socio-economic indicators have shown a bad impact form human beings, more effective measures need to be developed. (2) The results of a case study demonstrated that the methods in this paper provide a similar result corresponding with the actual lake health condition. Therefore, this paper shows that the proposed method is efficient and worths generalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Lake ecosystem A

B:

Lake ecosystem B

B i :

Biomass of the ith component

B t :

Biomass of all components

COD:

Chemical oxygen demand

CR:

Coefficient of consistence

Ex :

Exergy

Ex st :

Structural exergy

GDP:

Gross domestic product

HD :

Health distance

h i :

Relative distance

k 1, k 2,…,k n :

The weighting factors

n :

The total number of components selected

W i :

Weighting factor of the ith component

X 1, X 2,…,X n :

The indictors of lake ecosystems

References

  • Atkins JP, Burdon D, Elliott M et al (2011) Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Mar Pollut Bull 62(2):215–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai JH, Cui BS, Chen B et al (2011) Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in surface sediments from a typical plateau lake wetland, China. Ecol Model 222(2):301–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck MWBM, Hatch LKHL (2009) A review of research on the development of lake indices of biotic integrity. Environ Rev 17(NA):21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja Á, Galparsoro I, Solaun O et al (2006) The European water framework directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 66(1):84–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Dai LM, Fan ZH et al (2002) On forest ecosystem health and its evaluation. Chin J Appl Ecol 13(5):605–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Dai LM, Ji LZ et al (2004) Assessing forest ecosystem health I Model, method, and index system. Chin J Appl Ecol 15(10):1743–1749

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Mageau M (1999) What is a healthy ecosystem? Aquat Ecol 33(1):105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui BS, Yang ZF (2003) Temporal-spatial scale characteristic of wetland ecosystem health. Chin J Appl Ecol 14(1):121–125

    Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano L (2010) International initiatives for water policy assessment: a review. Water Resour Manag 24(11):2449–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (1995) Europe’s environment: the Dobris assessment. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2003) Environmental indicators: typology and use in reporting. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Einheuser MD, Nejadhashemi AP, Sowa SP et al (2012) Modeling the effects of conservation practices on stream health. Sci Total Environ 435:380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend AM, Rapport DJ (1991) Evolution of macro-information systems for sustainable development. Ecol Econ 3(1):59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao HF, Bai JH, Xiao R et al (2013) Levels, sources and risk assessment of trace elements in wetland soils of a typical shallow freshwater lake, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(1):275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gari SR, Newton A, Icely JD (2015) A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coast Manag 103:63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu ZX, Hu WP, Gu XH et al (2005) Assessment of ecosystem health in Lake Taihu. J Lake Sci 17(3):256–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang LB, Bai JH, Gao HF et al (2013) Soil organic carbon content and storage of raised field wetlands in different functional zones of a typical shallow freshwater lake, China. Soil Res 50(8):664–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui XJ, Yang T, Li FY et al (2011) Health assessment on aquatic ecosystem in Liaohe River of Liaoning Province. Chin J Appl Ecol 22(1):181–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia HC, Cao CX, Ma GR et al (2011) Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in the source region of Yangtze, Yellow and Yalu Tsangpo Rivers of Qinghai Province. Wetl Sci 09(3):209–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang WG, Li J, Li JH et al (2005) Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in the Liaohe River Delta. Acta Ecol Sin 25(3):408–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Jining Municipal Science Technology Commission (1987) Study on investigation and utilization of natural resources in the Nansi Lake, China. Shandong Science & Technology Press, Jinan

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE (1995a) Exergy and ecological buffer capacities as measures of ecosystem health. Ecosyst Health 1(3):150–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE (1995b) The application of ecological indicators to assess the ecological condition of a lake. Lakes Reserv: Res Manag 1(3):177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagalou I, Leonardos I, Anastasiadou C et al (2012) The DPSIR approach for an integrated river management framework. A preliminary application on a mediterranean site (Kalamas River-NW Greece). Water Resour Manag 26:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane DD, Gordon SI, Munawar M et al (2009) The planktonic index of biotic integrity (P-IBI): an approach for assessing lake ecosystem health. Ecol Indic 9:1234–1247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1981) Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL et al (1986) Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, special publication 5, pp 1–28

  • Kelble CR, Loomis DK, Lovelace S et al (2013) The EBM-DPSER conceptual model: integrating ecosystem services into the DPSIR framework. PLoS One 8(8):e70766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Meng F (2011) Health assessment of wetland ecosystems and tourism development in Shandong Province. Resour Sci 33(7):1390–1397

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CH, Ye C, Zhao XF et al (2012) The ecosystem health assessment of the littoral zone of Lake Taihu. Acta Ecol Sin 32(12):3806–3815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Zhang ZL, Sun YY (2013) Simulation of non-point source pollution of nitrogen and phosphorus in Lake Nansi watershed using SWAT model. J Lake Sci 25(2):236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Guo HC, Dai YL et al (2004) An assessing approach for lake ecosystem health. Acta Sci Circumst 24(4):723–729

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GY, Yang ZF, Chen B et al (2008) Emergy-based urban ecosystem health assessment: a case study of baotou city. Acta Ecol Sin 28(4):1720–1728

    Google Scholar 

  • Mageau M, Costanza R, Ulanowicz R (1998) Quantifying the trends expected in developing ecosystems. Ecol Model 112(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai SZ, Xu SJ, Pan YJ (2005) Application of the PSR model to the evaluation of wetland ecosystem health. Trop Geogr 25(4):317–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins JH, Camanho AS, Gaspar MB (2012) A review of the application of driving forces—pressure-state-impact-response framework to fisheries management. Ocean Coast Manag 69:273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxim L, Spangenberg JH, O’Connor M (2009) An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework. Ecol Econ 69(1):12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namaalwa S, Van Dam AA, Funk A et al (2013) A characterization of the drivers, pressures, ecosystem functions and services of Namatala wetland, Uganda. Environ Sci Policy 34:44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness B, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2010) Structuring problems in sustainability science: the multi-level DPSIR framework. Geoforum 41(3):479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993) OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews. OECD Environmental Monographs No. 83, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Omann I, Stocker A, Jäger J (2009) Climate change as a threat to biodiversity: an application of the DPSIR approach. Ecol Econ 69(1):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei XJ, Niu CJ, Gao X et al (2010) The ecological health assessment of Liao River Basin, China, based on biotic integrity index of fish. Acta Ecol Sin 30(21):5736–5746

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto R, de Jonge VN, Neto JM et al (2013) Towards a DPSIR driven integration of ecological value, water uses and ecosystem services for estuarine systems. Ocean Coast Manag 72:64–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirrone N, Trombino G, Cinnirella S et al (2005) The driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) approach for integrated catchment-coastal zone management: preliminary application to the Po catchment-Adriatic Sea coastal zone system. Reg Environ Change 5(2):111–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir A, Malik RN (2009) Assessment of an index of biological integrity (IBI) to quantify the quality of two tributaries of river Chenab, Sialkot, Pakistan. Hydrobiologia 621(1):127–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ, Costanza R, McMichael AJ (1998) Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol 13(10):397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty RW (1987) The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3–5):161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekovski I, Newton A, Dennison WC (2012) Megacities in the coastal zone: using a driver-pressure-state-impact-response framework to address complex environmental problems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 96:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao C, Guan Y, Chu C et al (2014) Trends analysis of ecological environment security based on DPSIR model in the coastal zone: a survey study in Tianjin, China. Int J Environ Res 8(3):765–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Song HM, Xu LY (2011) A method of urban ecological risk assessment: combining the multimedia fugacity model and GIS. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(5):713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong ZJ, Zhang JQ, Liu XP (2009) GIS-based risk assessment of grassland fire disaster in western Jilin province, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(4):463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1984) A framework for the development of environment statistics, Statistical papers series M, No.78. United Nations Department of international Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Office, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley JJ (2002) Framework for measuring sustainable development in catchment systems. Environ Manag 29(2):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen X, Chen N (2013) Studies on evaluation of modernization of the inland port and shipping management based on DPSIR model and gray correlation evaluation model. Proced—Soc Behav Sci 96:1792–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao FJ, Ouyang H, Fu BJ et al (2003) Forest ecosystem health assessment indicators and application in China. Acta Geogra Sin 58(6):803–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu FL (1997) Exergy and structural exergy as ecological indicators for the development state of the Lake Chaohu ecosystem. Ecol Model 99(1):41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu FL, Tao S, Dawson RW et al (2001) Lake ecosystem health assessment: indicators and methods. Water Res 35(13):3157–3167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu FL, Yang ZF, Chen B et al (2011) Ecosystem health assessment of the plant-dominated Baiyangdian Lake based on eco-exergy. Ecol Model 222(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu FL, Yang ZF, Chen B et al (2012) Ecosystem health assessment of Baiyangdian Lake based on thermodynamic indicators. Procedia Environ Sci 13:2402–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LY, Shen J, Zhang ZL et al (2003) Distribution and ecological risk assessment for heavy metals in superficial sediments of Nansihu Lake. J Lake Sci 15(3):252–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Li XM, Sun CZ et al (2008a) Assessment on urban environment of Dalian spatial differences based on DPSRC framework. China Popul Resour Environ 18(5):86–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Li XM, Zhang Y et al (2008b) Assessment on urban ecological security spatial differences based on causal network: a case of Dalian City. Acta Ecol Sin 28(6):2774–2783

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Li YH, Wang JC et al (2012) The assessment of river health using benthic-index of biotic integrity for Wenyu River. Acta Ecol Sin 32(11):3313–3322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G, Zhang S, Yu Q et al (2014) Assessing ecological security at the watershed scale based on RS/GIS: a case study from the Hanjiang River Basin. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28(2):307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan XZ, Liu H, Lu JJ (2001) Assessment of ecosystem health—concept framework and indicator selection. Chin J Appl Ecol 12(4):627–629

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZL, Liang CL, Guan YB (2008) Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in the Nansihu Lake. China Popul Resour Environ 18(1):180–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Gurkan Z, Jorgensen SE (2010) Application of eco-exergy for assessment of ecosystem health and development of structurally dynamic models. Ecol Model 221(4):693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Cui L, Zhang JQ et al (2015) Grid based dynamic risk assessment for grassland fire disaster in Hulunbuir. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(2):589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Chai LH (2015) A new assessment approach for urban ecosystem health basing on maximum information entropy method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(1):1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZY, Xu FL, Zhan W et al (2005) A quantitative method for assessing lake ecosystem health. Acta Ecol Sin 25(6):1466–1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao SX, Zhang C, Gao XP et al (2012) The impact of the operation of eastern route project of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project on water quality in Lake Nansi. J Lake Sci 24(6):923–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou WH, Wang RS (2005) An entropy weight approach on the fuzzy synthetic assessment of Beijing urban ecosystem health, China. Acta Ecol Sin 25(12):3244–3251

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Major Program of Water Pollution Control and Treatment Technology of China under Grant No. 2014ZX07201-011-002), the National Key Technology R&D Program of China under Grant No. 2013BAK05B01 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 41471140, 41371495. The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful and helpful comments to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, People’s Republic of China

    Feng Zhang, Jiquan Zhang, Rina Wu & Qiyun Ma

  2. School of Urban and Environment, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, People’s Republic of China

    Jun Yang

Authors
  1. Feng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiquan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rina Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qiyun Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiquan Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Wu, R. et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on DPSIRM framework and health distance model in Nansi Lake, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30, 1235–1247 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1109-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1109-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation