Significance tests for covariate-dependent trends in inhomogeneous spatio-temporal point processes

  • Carlos Díaz-AvalosEmail author
  • P. Juan
  • J. Mateu
Original Paper


Modeling and inference for spatial and spatio-temporal point processes is an issue that has been broadly investigated in the last years. Application fields such as forestry, epidemiology and ecology have been the main engine driving such raised interest. The inclusion of spatially varying covariates in the models for the intensity function is becoming of particular interest, but little attention has been paid to testing the significance of such covariates. Testing the significance of covariates is important if one seeks to explain which covariates have an effect in the spatial or spatio-temporal distribution of the point pattern observed. We thus provide practical procedures to build statistical tests of significance for covariates that have an effect on the intensity function of a point pattern. Our approximation focuses on the conditional intensity function, by considering nonparametric kernel-based estimators. We calculate thinning probabilities under the conditions of absence and presence of a covariate and compare them through divergence measures. Based on Monte Carlo experiments, we approximate the statistical properties of our tests under a variety of practical scenarios. An application on testing the significance of a covariate in a spatio-temporal data set on wildfires is also developed.


Conditional intensity function Covariates Multidimensional spatial point processes Nonparametric estimation Significance Wildfires 



Work partially funded by Grant MTM2010-14961 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education and by the program PASPA of the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. We are grateful to the reports of the reviewers and AE which improved the reading and quality of the manuscript.


  1. Assunçao R, Maia A (2007) A note on testing separability in spatial-temporal-marked point processes. Biometrics 63: 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley A, Turner R (2005). Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12: 1–42Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley A, van Lieshout MNM (1995). Area-interaction point processes. Ann Inst Stat Math 47: 601–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman M., Diggle P.J. (1989). Estimating weighted integrals of the second-order intensity of a spatial point process. J R Stat Soc Ser B 51: 81–92Google Scholar
  5. Besag JE, Diggle PJ (1977) Simple Monte Carlo tests for spatial pattern. J R Stat Soc Ser C 26(3):327–333Google Scholar
  6. Chang C-H, Schoenberg FP (2011). Testing separability in marked multidimensional point processes with covariates. Ann Inst Stat Math 63:1103–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comas C, Mateu J (2011) Statistical inference for Gibbs point processes based on field observations. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25:287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data (revised edn.). Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Daley D, Vere-Jones D (2003) An introduction to the theory of point processes, 2nd ed, vol I. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Dasgupta A, Raftery AE (1998) Detecting features in spatial point processes with clutter via model-based clustering. J Am Stat Assoc 93: 294–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DÍaz-Avalos C, Juan P, Mateu J (2012) Similarity measures of conditional intensity functions to test separability in multidimensional point processes. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1193–1205Google Scholar
  12. Diggle PJ (2003). Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns, 2nd edn. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Diggle PJ, Zheng P, Durr P (2005) Nonparametric estimation of spatial segregation in a multivariate point process: bovine tuberculosis in Cornwall, UK. Appl Stat 54(3): 645–658Google Scholar
  14. Gelfand AE, Diggle PJ, Guttorp P, Fuentes M (2010) Handbook of spatial statistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  15. Guan Y (2008a) A goodness-of-fit test for inhomogeneous spatial Poisson processes. Biometrika 95: 831–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guan Y. (2008b) On consistent nonparametric intensity estimation for inhomogeneous spatial point processes. J Am Stat Assoc 103: 1238–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juan P, Mateu J, Saez M (2012) Pinpointing spatio-temporal interactions in wildfire patterns. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26(8):1131–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelshall JE, Diggle PJ (1998) Spatial variation in risk of disease: a non parametric binary regression approach. Appl Stat 47: 539–573Google Scholar
  19. Møller J, Díaz-Avalos C (2010) Structured spatio-temporal shot-noise Cox point process models, with a view to modelling forest fires. Scand J Stat 37: 2–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Møller J, Rasmussen JG (2005) Perfect simulation of Hawkes processes. Adv Appl Probab 37: 629–646.Google Scholar
  21. Møller J, Waagepetersen RP (2003) An introduction to simulation-based inference for spatial point processes. In Møller J (ed) Spatial statistics and computational methods, lecture notes in statistics, vol 173. Springer, New York, pp 143–198Google Scholar
  22. Møller J, Waagepetersen RP (2004) Statistical inference and simulation for spatial point processes. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  23. Ripley B.D. (1976) The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J Appl Probab 13:256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schoenberg F.P. (2004) Testing separability in multi-dimensional point processes. Biometrics 60:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schoenberg FP (2006) A note on the separability of multidimensional point processes with covariates. UCLA Preprint Series, No. 496Google Scholar
  26. Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner R (2009) Point patterns of forest fire locations. Environ Ecol Stat 16: 197–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Waagepetersen R (2007) An estimating function approach to inference for inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott processes. Biometrics 63:252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waagepetersen R, Guan Y (2009) Two-step estimation for inhomogeneous spatial point processes. J R Stat Soc Ser B 71:685–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute in Applied Mathematics and SystemsNational University of MexicoMexicoMexico
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics Universitat Jaume ICastellónSpain

Personalised recommendations