Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysing space–time tree interdependencies based on individual tree growth functions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analysed the space–time structure of two spatially explicit forest data sets considering the associated growth function for each tree obtained from the annual radial growth measured from increment cores bored at breast height. We used a new second order formulation based on the mark correlation function, the functional mark correlation function, to analyse spatial pattern involving functions to each spatial location. A decomposition of individual growth function into spatial and non-spatial components was considered and only the spatial components were analysed. Our results confirm the usefulness of these new approach compared with other well-established spatial statistical tools such as the mark correlation function. In particular, the functional mark correlation function of the spatial and temporal components of tree growth determines the space–time structure of tree development regardless of the non-spatial components contained in this function. Moreover, this explicit temporal analysis detects space–time interaction effects that are not evident when analysing the spatial distribution of cumulative growth measures such as the tree basal area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Baddeley A, Møller J, Waagepetersen R (2000) Non- and semi-parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns. Stat Neerl 54:329–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard G (1963) Contribution to discussion of “The spectral analysis of point processes" by M.S. Bartlett. J R Stat Soc B 25:294

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag J, Diggle PJ (1977) Simple Monte Carlo tests for spatial pattern. Appl Stat 26:327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajander AK (1926) The theory of forest types. Acta For Fenn 29:l–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas C (2009) Modelling forest regeneration strategies through the development of a spatio-temporal growth interaction model. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23(8):1089–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas C, Palahí M, Pukkala T, Mateu J (2009) Characterising forest spatial structure through inhomogeneous second order characteristics. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas C, Mateu J (2007) Modelling forest dynamics: a perspective from point process methods. Biom J 49(2):176–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas C, Mateu J, Delicado P (2011a) On tree intensity estimation for forest inventories: some statistical issues. Biom J 53(6):994–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas C, Delicado P, Mateu J (2011b) A second order approach to analyse spatial point patterns with functional marks. TEST 20:503–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley DJ, Vere-Jones D (2004) An introduction to the theory of point processes, 2nd ed. Springer, New York

  • Diggle PJ (2003) Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. Hodder Arnold. London.

  • Dwass M (1957) Modified randomization tests for nonparametric hypotheses. Ann Math Stat Statistics 28:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrikov VL (1995) A model of collisions of growing individuals: a further development. Ecol Model 79:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrikov VL, Stoyan D (1995) The use of marked point processes in ecological and environmental forest studies. Environ Ecol Stat 2:331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrikov VL, Grabarnik P, Stoyan D (1993) Trunk-top relations in a Siberian pine forest. Biom J 35:487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gort J, Mehtätalo L, Peltola H, Zubizarreta-Gerendiain A, Pulkkinen P, Venäläinen A (2011) Effects of spacing and genetic entry on radial growth and ring density development in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Ann For Sci 68(7):1233–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabarnik P, Myllymäki M, Stoyan D (2011) Correct testing of mark independence for marked point patterns. Ecol model 222:3888–3894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies. Springer, New York.

  • Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. Wiley, London.

  • Isham V (1987) Marked point processes and their correlations. In: Droesbeke F (ed) Spatial processes and spatial time series analysis, proceedings of the 6th Franco-Belgian meeting of statisticians, Rouen

  • Leemans R (1991) Canopy gaps and establishment patterns of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in two old-growth coniferous forest in Central Sweden. Vegetation 93:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miina J. (1993) Residual variation in diameter growth in a stand of Scots pine and Norway spruce. For Ecol Manag 58:111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miina J (2000) Dependence of tree-ring, earlywood and latewood indices of Scots pine and Norway spruce on climatic factors in eastern Finland. Ecol Model 132:259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeur M (1993) Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem-mapped data. For Sci 39:756–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Park A, Kneeshaw D, Bergeron Y, Leduc A (2005) Spatial relationships and tree species associations across a 236-year boreal mixedwood chronosequence. Can J For Res 35:750–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pélissier R (1998) Tree spatial patterns in three contrasting plots of a southern Indian tropical moist evergreen forest. J Trop Ecol 14:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penttinen A, Stoyan D (1989) Statistical analysis for a class of line segment processes. Scand J Stat 16:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Penttinen A, Stoyan D, Henttonen HM (1992) Marked point processes in forest statistics. For Sci 38:806–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and computing series. Springer, New York.

  • Renshaw E, Comas C, Mateu J (2009) Analysis of forest thinning strategies through the development of space–time growth–interaction simulation models. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley BD (1976) The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J Appl Probab 13:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley BD (1977) Modelling spatial patterns (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 39:172–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan D (1984) On correlations of marked point processes. Math Nachr 116:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan D, Stoyan H (1994) Fractals, random shapes and point fields: methods of geometrical statistics. Wiley, Chichester.

  • Stoyan D, Kendall WS, Mecke J (1995) Stochastic geometry and its applications. Wiley, New York

  • Szwagrzyk J, Czerwczak M (1993) Spatial patterns of trees in natural forests of East-Central Europe. J Veg Sci 4:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Editor, AE and two anonymous referees whose comments and suggestions have clearly improved an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Comas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Comas, C., Mehtätalo, L. & Miina, J. Analysing space–time tree interdependencies based on individual tree growth functions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27, 1673–1681 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0704-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0704-3

Keywords