Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of mean-field bias of the radar rain rate using rain gauges available within a small portion of radar umbrella: a case study of the Donghae (East Sea) radar in Korea

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Observation of a storm approaching from the ocean to the in-land area is very important for the flood forecasting. Radar is generally used for this purpose. However, as rain gauges are mostly located within the in-land area, detection of the mean-field bias of radar rain rate cannot be easily made. This problem is obviously different from that with evenly-spaced rain gauges over the radar umbrella. This study investigated the detection problem of mean-field bias of radar rain rate when rain gauges are available within a small portion of radar umbrella. To exactly determine the mean-field bias, i.e. the difference between the radar rain rate and the rain gauge rain rate, the variance of the difference between two observations must be small; thus, a sufficient number of observations are indispensable. Therefore, the problem becomes determining the number of rain gauges that will satisfy the given accuracy, that being the variance of the difference between two observations. The dimensionless error variance derived by dividing the expected value of the error variance by the variance of the areal average rain rate was introduced as a criteria to effectively detect the mean field bias. Here, the variance of the areal average rain rate was assumed to be the climatological one and the expectation for the error variance could be changed depending one the sampling characteristics. As an example, this study evaluated the rainfall observation over the East Sea by the Donghae radar. About 6.8 % of the entire radar umbrella covered in-land areas, where the rain gauges were available. It was found that, to limit the dimensionless error variance to 2 %, a total of 26 rain gauges are required for the entire radar umbrella; whereas, a total of 24 rain gauges would be required within the in-land area with available for the rain gauge data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anagnostou EN, Krajewski WF, Seo DJ, Johnson ER (1998) Mean-field rainfall bias studies for WSR-88D. J Hydrol Eng 3(3):149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azimi-Zonooz A, Krajewski WF, Bowles DS (1989) Nonlinear estimation of rainfall using radar and raingage data. J Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 3:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chumchean S, Sharma A, Seed A (2003) Rainfall error variance and its impact on radar rainfall calibration. Phys Chem Earth 28:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chumchean S, Seed A, Sharma A (2006) Correcting real-time radar rainfall bias using a Kalman filtering approach. J Hydrol 317:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creutin JD, Andrieu H, Faure D (1997) Use of a weather radar for the hydrology of a mountainous area. Part II: radar measurement validation. J Hydrol 193:26–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damant C, Austin GL, Bellon A, Broughton RS (1983) Errors in the Thissen technique for estimating areal rain amounts using weather radar data. J Hydrol 62:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eleuch S, Carsteanu A, Bâ K, Magagi R, Goïta K, Diaz C (2010) Validation and use of rainfall radar data to simulate water flows in the Rio Escondido basin. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24(5):559–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves CE, Valdes JB, Shen SSP, North GR (1993) Evaluation of sampling errors of precipitation from spaceborne and ground sensors. J Appl Meteorol 32(2):374–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha E, North GR, Yoo C, Ha K (2002) Evaluation of some ground truth designs for satellite estimates of rain rate. J Atmos Ocean Technol 19(1):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolovos A, Angulo JM, Modis K, Papantonopoulos G, Wang JF, Christakos G (2012) Model-driven development of covariances for spatiotemporal environmental health assessment. Environ Monit Assess. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2593-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski WF, Smith JA (2002) Radar hydrology: rainfall estimation. Adv Water Resour 25:1387–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North GR, Nakamoto S (1989) Formalism for comparing rain estimation designs. J Atmos Ocean Technol 6(6):985–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North GR, Valdes JB, Ha E, Shen SSP (1994) The ground truth problem for satellite estimates of rainrate. J Atmos Ocean Technol 11(4):1035–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo DJ (1998a) Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using rain gage data under fractional coverage conditions. J Hydrol 208:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo DJ (1998b) Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data. J Hydrol 208:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo DJ (2012) Conditional bias—penalized kriging (CBPK). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-012-0567-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo DJ, Smith JA (1991a) Rainfall estimation using raingages and radar—a Bayesian approach: 1. Deribation of estimators. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 5(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo DJ, Smith JA (1991b) Rainfall estimation using raingages and radar—a Bayesian approach: 2. Application. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 5(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Krajewski WF (1991) Estimation of mean-field bias of radar rainfall estimates. J Appl Meteorol 30:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner M, Smith JA, Burges SJ, Alonso CV, Darden RW (1999) Effect of bias adjustment and rain gauge data quality control on radar rainfall estimation. Water Resour Res 35(8):2487–2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdes JB, Nakamoto S, Shen SSP, North GR (1990) Estimation of multi-dimensional precipitation parameters by areal estimates of oceanic rainfall. J Geophys 95(D3):2101–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JF, Christakos G, Hu MG (2009) Modeling spatial means of surfaces with stratified nonhomogeneity. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(12):4167–4174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JF, Reis BY, Hu MG, Christakos G, Yang WZ, Sun Q, Li ZJ, Li XZ, Lai SJ, Chen HY, Wang DC (2011) Area disease estimation based on sentinel hospital records. PLoS One 6(8):e23428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waymire E, Gupta VK, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1984) Spectral theory of rainfall intensity at the meso-β scale. Water Resour Res 20(10):1453–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C (1997) Application of multi-dimensional precipitation models to the sampling error problem. J Korean Soc Civil Eng 30(50):441–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C (2001) Sampling of soil moisture fields and related errors: implications to the optimal sampling design. Adv Water Resour 24(5):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Ha E (2001) Multi-dimensional precipitation models and their application to the ground-truth problem: multiple rain gauge case. Water Eng 5(1):51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Jung K (2001) Estimation of area average rainfall amount and its error. J Korean Soc Civil Eng 34(4):317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Kim K (2007) Effect of combined rainfall observation with radar and rain gauge. J Korean Soc Civil Eng 40(11):841–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Valdes JB, North GR (1996) Stochastic modeling of multi-dimensional precipitation fields considering spectral structures. Water Resour Res 32(7):2175–2187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Ha E, Shin SC (2002) Model vs design sensitivity to the ground-truth problem of rainfall observation. Adv Water Resour 25(6):651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported partly by a Korea University Grant and partly by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MEST) (No. 2010-0014566). All contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jungsoo Yoon.

Appendix A: Derivation of Eq. (8)

Appendix A: Derivation of Eq. (8)

Derivation of Eq. (8) can be found in North and Nakamoto (1989) and North et al. (1994). Summarizing their work is as follows. First, the rain rate field \( \psi (r,\,t) \) at a point r in a region, with an area of A is assumed to be random. Now the variance of the error for an arbitrary j-th bin between the areal average radar rain rate and the rain gauge rain is expressed as:

$$ \varepsilon_{j}^{2} = \left\langle {\left( {\Uppsi_{{G_{J} }} - \Uppsi_{{R_{J} }} } \right)^{2} } \right\rangle = \frac{1}{{A^{2} }}\int\limits_{R} {\int\limits_{R} {\left\langle {\psi (r,\,t)\psi (r^{\prime } ,\,t^{\prime } )} \right\rangle \left[ {1 - K(r)} \right]\left[ {1 - K(r^{\prime } )} \right]d^{2} rd^{2} r^{\prime } } } $$
(A 1)

where, \( K(r) = A\delta (r_{{g_{n} }} ) \) and \( < \psi (r,\,t)\psi (r',\,t') > \) is the lag covariance. And the lag covariance is expressed by the variance of the rain rate field \( \psi (r,\,t) \), \( \sigma^{2} \), and the space–time lagged autocorrelation having space lag \( \xi \) and time lag \( \eta \), \( \rho \). And the spectrum of the rain rate field, S, is expressed as Fourier transform of the autocorrelation.

$$ \left\langle {\psi (r,\,t)\psi (r^{\prime } ,\,t^{\prime } )} \right\rangle = \sigma^{2} \rho (\xi ,\eta ) $$
(A 2)

Eq. (A 1) can be transformed by Fourier transform like below.

$$ \varepsilon_{j}^{2} = \sigma^{2} \int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {\left| {D_{\varepsilon } (v)} \right|^{2} S(v)d^{2} v} } $$
(A 3)

where, S is the spatial spectrum. \( D_{\varepsilon } (v) = D_{R} (v) - e^{{2\pi ivr_{g} }} \) and \( D_{R} \) is the function defined for the shape of the region satisfying \( D_{R} (v) = \,\,\frac{1}{A}\int\limits_{R} {e^{2\pi ivr} d^{2} r} \). And Expectation of \( D_{\varepsilon }^{2} (v) \) is like below.

$$ E\left[ {\left| {D_{\varepsilon } (v)} \right|^{2} } \right] = 1 + D_{R}^{2} (v) - D_{R} (v)E\left[ {\cos \left( {2\pi v \cdot r_{g} } \right)} \right] = 1 - D_{R}^{2} (v) $$
(A 4)

Expectation of Eq. (A 3) is like below.

$$ E\left[ {\varepsilon_{j}^{2} } \right] = \sigma^{2} \int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {[1 - D_{R}^{2} (v)]S(v)d^{2} v} } = \sigma^{2} \int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {\int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {H(v)S(v)d^{2} v} } $$
(A 5)

where, \( 1 - D_{R}^{2} (v) \) equal to the design filter \( H(v) \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoo, C., Yoon, J. & Ha, E. Detection of mean-field bias of the radar rain rate using rain gauges available within a small portion of radar umbrella: a case study of the Donghae (East Sea) radar in Korea. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27, 423–433 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0644-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0644-3

Keywords

Navigation