Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment and zoning of eco-environmental sensitivity for a typical developing province in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Irrational exploitation and utility of resources and extensive economic growth have become the primary causes of deterioration of ecological environment in many provinces in China. Ecological environment deterioration necessitates ecological zoning and planning in order to regulate human activities and guide the sustainable use of resources and ecological services. Eco-environmental sensitivity assessment is a basis upon which the establishment of rational zoning and planning rests. This research focused on evaluating the eco-environmental sensitivity in Anhui province, a typical province confronted with contradiction between socio-economic development and resource restriction. A multifactor assessment approach to zoning the eco-environmental sensitivity for the province in complex ecological environment and physical geographic condition was presented by incorporating remote sensing, Geographic information system, and observation and statistical data. Based on these, to support landscape and urban planning and design, rational deployment of resources and arrangement of industry, and promote sustainable development of ecology, society and economy, the recommendations for ecological construction and regional development were proposed for different zones of principal functions, and an ecological security pattern was constructed from one ecological functional core, four ecological functional zones, six ecological functional belts, three types of ecological functional corridors, and some ecological functional patches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anhui Bureau of Statistics (2011) 2010 Anhui Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

  • Bernard G, Boudouresque CF, Picon P (2007) Long term changes in Zostera meadows in the Berre lagoon (Provence, Mediterranean Sea). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73:617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da L, Li L, Li W, Chen M (2004) The definition and types of urban ecological sensitive area with the case study in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China. J East China Norm Univ (Natural Science) 2:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang QF, Yang XP, Cai Y (1997) Regional integration and sustainable development: the formulation and implementation of the development plan for urban agglomeration of Pearl-River-Delta economic region. City Plan Rev 22:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Silveira JA, Morales-Ojeda SM (2009) Evaluation of the health status of a coastal ecosystem in southeast Mexico: assessment of water quality, phytoplankton and submerged aquatic vegetation. Mar Pollut Bull 59:72–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho W (2008) Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 186:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SL (2000) Ecological land use planning. Zhanshi Publishing House, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang L (2005) Study on the planning of ecological environment sensitive region in Three Gorges towns. Dissertation, Chongqing University, Chongqing

  • Ignatieva M, Stewart GH, Meurk C (2011) Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landsc Ecol Eng 7:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusler JA (1980) Regulating sensitive lands: a guidebook. Ballinger, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhua X, Sun X, Wang F (2010) Landscape effects of environmental impact on bay-area wetlands under rapid urban expansion and development policy: a case study of Lianyungang, China. Landsc Urban Plan 94:218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Ouyang ZY, Wang XK, Xu WH, Miao H (2003) Eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial distribution in Gansu province. Acta Ecol Sin 23:2711–2718

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu N, Ai N, Fang Y, Yi C (2007) Application of the fuzzy matter-element model based on coefficients of entropy to evaluation of urban ecosystem health. J Chengdu Univ Technol (Science & Technology Edition) 34:589–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndubisi F, DeMeo T, Ditto ND (1995) Environmentally sensitive areas: a template for developing greenway corridors. Landsc Urban Plan 33:159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang ZY, Wang XK, Miao H (2000) China’s eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial heterogeneity. Acta Ecol Sin 20:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin Y, Yang Z, Yang W (2011) Ecological risk assessment for water scarcity in China’s Yellow River Delta Wetland. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25:697–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner F, Blair J, McSherry L, Guhathakurta S, Marruffo J, Holm M (2000) A watershed at a watershed: the potential for environmentally sensitive area protection in the upper San Pedro drainage basin (Mexico and USA). Landsc Urban Plan 49:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su S, Li D, Yu X, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Xiao R, Zhi J, Wu J (2011) Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25:737–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suffling R (1980) An index of ecological sensitivity to disturbance, based on ecosystem age, and related to landscape diversity. J Environ Manag 10:253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Z, Xu X, Yan L (2010) Analyzing qualitative and quantitative changes in coastal wetland associated to the effects of natural and anthropogenic factors in a part of Tianjin, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan L, Xu XG, Xie ZL, Li HL (2009) Integrated assessment on ecological sensitivity for Beijing. Acta Ecol Sin 29:3117–3125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2011) Ecological informatics for ecosystem conservation in view of environmental risk assessment and management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25:641–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Xu J, Han G (2007) Ecological sensitive area division indicator system. Ecol Sci 26:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhang J, Huang G (2010) Ecological sensitivity and managemental countermeasures of environments in Qingyang city, Gansu province. J Desert Res 30:614–619

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Z, Sun J, Ren G (2005) Study and application on the entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Acta Sci Circumst 25:552–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study described in this article was funded by Open Research Funding Program of KLGIS (No. KLGIS2011A12), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Open Fund from Key Laboratory of Marine Management Technique of State Oceanic Administration (No. 201112). The authors also appreciate the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions on our article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Dai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, X., Li, Z., Lin, S. et al. Assessment and zoning of eco-environmental sensitivity for a typical developing province in China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26, 1095–1107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0550-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0550-0

Keywords

Navigation