Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the important role of land ecosystem in social-economic progress at regional, national, and international scale and concurrent degradation of land ecosystems under rapid urbanization, a systematic diagnosis of land ecological security (eco-security) for sustainable development is needed. A catastrophe model for land ecological security assessment was developed in order to overcome the disadvantages in subjectivity and complexity of the currently used assessment methods. The catastrophe assessment index system was divided into hierarchical sub-systems under the pressure-state-response framework. The catastrophe model integrated multiple assessment indices of land eco-security according to the inherent contradictions and relative importance of indices without calculating weights. Specifically, membership degree of higher level index was calculated based on the membership degrees of lower level indices that were subjective to suitable model, such as cusp, fold, swallowtail and butterfly model. This model was applied to evaluate the state of land eco-security in Shanghai. Mann–Kendall’s test was utilized to characterize its temporal trend between 1999 and 2008. Significant downward trend was identified for land eco-security, in terms of pressure sub-index, state sub-index, response sub-index and synthetic index. All these implied that land ecosystem conditions were not optimistic for Shanghai and such situation should draw the attention of policy makers. The calculation procedure presented in this paper does not require a high level of technical expertise to determine the membership degree, making it simple and operational. Being applicable to similar land ecosystems, the catastrophe model is thus believed to provide an alternative approach to land eco-security assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barunik J, Vosvrda M (2009) Can a stochastic cusp catastrophe model explain stock market crashes? J Econ Dynam Contr 33:1824–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan RCK, Shimou Y (1999) Urbanization and sustainable metropolitan development in China: patterns, problems and prospects. GeoJournal 49:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cun C, Vilagines R (1997) Time series analysis on chlorides, nitrates, ammonium and dissolved oxygen concentrations in the Seine river near Paris. Sci Total Environ 208:59–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin R, Tsigas M, Lewandrowski J, Raneses A (1996) Land use and cover in ecological economics. Ecol Econ 17:157–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Ou X, He D, Shi J (2007) Key issues on watershed ecological security assessment. Sci China Ser B 52:251–261

    Google Scholar 

  • García M, Oyonarte C, Villagarcía L, Contreras S, Domingo F, Puigdefábregas J (2008) Monitoring land degradation risk using ASTER data: the non-evaporative fraction as an indicator of ecosystem function. Remote Sens Environ 112:3720–3736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honson M, Marvin S (2009) ‘Urban Ecological Security’: a new urban paradigm? Int J Urban Reg Res 33:193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA

  • Long H, Liu Y, Wu X, Dong G (2009) Spatio-temporal dynamic patterns of farmland and rural settlements in Su-Xi-Chang region: implications for building a new countryside in coastal China. Land Use Policy 26:322–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann F (2009) Institutional causes of urban and rural sprawl in Switzerland. Land Use Policy 26:919–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark LS (2006) Threat level green: conceding ecology for security in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Global Environ Change 16:400–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mische PM (1998) Global issues series: ecological security & the UN system: past, present, future. Global Education Associations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston T, Ian S (1978) Catastrophe theory and application. Lord, Pitman

  • Salvati L, Bajocco S (2011) Land sensitivity to desertification across Italy: past, present, and future. Appl Geogr 31:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber FA, Baiguera M, Bortolotto G, Caglioti V (1997) A study of the dynamic behaviour of some workload allocation algorithms by means of catastrophe theory. J Syst Architect 43:605–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs MA, Pirages D (1998) Ecological security in Northeast Asia. Yonsei University Press, Seoul

  • Shanghai Bureau of Statistics (2000–2009) Shanghai statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China (In Chinese)

  • Shi Y, Liu Y, He J (2003) Further study on some questions of catastrophe evaluation method. Eng J Wuhan Univ 36:132–136 (In Chinese, with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkule B, Ortolano L (1995) Implementing environmental policy in China. Praeger, Westport, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Su S, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Zhi J, Wu J (2010a) Rural settlement expansion and paddy soil loss across an ex-urbanizing watershed in eastern coastal China during market transition. Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0197-2

  • Su S, Chen X, DeGloria SD, Wu J (2010b) Integrative fuzzy set pair model for land ecological security assessment: a case study of Xiaolangdi Reservoir Region, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su S, Li D, Zhang Q, Xiao R, Huang F, Wu J (2011) Temporal trend and source apportionment of water pollution in different functional zones of Qiantang River, China. Water Res 45:1781–1795

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom R (1975) Structural stability and morphogenesis. W.A. Benjamin Inc, Reading, MA

  • Vadrevu KP, Cardina J, Hitzhusen F et al (2008) Case study of an integrated framework for quantifying agroecosystem health. Ecosystems 11:283–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Webber M, Finlayson B, Barnett J (2008) Rural industries and water pollution in China. J Environ Manage 86:648–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Liu S, Zhang S, Chen J (2011) Assessment of a model of pollution disaster in near-shore coastal waters based on catastrophe theory. Ecol Model 222:307–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidlich W, Huebner H (2008) Dynamics of political opinion formation including catastrophe theory. J Econ Behav Organ 67:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels KJ, Prince SD, Frost PE, van Zyl D (2004) Assessing the effects of human-induced land degradation in the former homelands of northern South Africa with a 1 km AVHRR NDVI time-series. Remote Sens Environ 91:47–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westing AH (1989) The environmental component of comprehensive security. Bull Peace Propos 20:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodstock AER, Poston T (1974) A geometrical study of the elementary catastrophes, Springer Lecture Notes in Math, vol. 373. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Zeng G, Chen G et al (2007) Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—a case study of Hunan Province, China. Ecol Model 209:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman EC (1976) Catastrophe theory. Sci Am 234:65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xu C, Tao H, Jiang T, Chen Y (2010) Climate changes and their impacts on water resources in the arid regions: a case study of the Tarim River basin, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24:349–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Zou X, Cheng H et al (2006) Assessing the ecological security of the Tibetan plateau: methodology and a case study for Lhaze County. J Environ manage 80:120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Editor-in-chief George Christakos and two anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments and suggestions. This work was partly supported by the National Key Project Grant (2008ZX07101-006-01) and Emerging Talent Project of Zhejiang Province (2010R401140; 2010R401244).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaping Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, S., Li, D., Yu, X. et al. Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25, 737–746 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0457-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0457-9

Keywords

Navigation