Abstract
A fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis (FPPA) method was developed in this study to assess risks associated with environmental pollution-control problems. FPPA integrated environmental transport modeling, fuzzy transformation, probabilistic risk assessment, fuzzy risk quantification into a general risk assessment framework, and was capable of handling uncertainties expressed as fuzzy-parameterized stochastic distributions. The proposed method was applied to two environmental pollution problems, with one being about the point-source pollution in a river system with uncertain water quality parameters and the other being concerned with groundwater contaminant plume from waste landfill site with poorly known contaminant physical properties. The study results indicated that the complex uncertain features had significant impacts on modeling and risk-assessment outputs; the degree of impacts of modeling parameters were highly dependent on the level of imprecision of these parameters. The results also implied that FPPA was capable of addressing vagueness or imprecision associated with probabilistic risk evaluation, and help generate risk outputs that could be elucidated under different possibilistic levels. The proposed method could be used by environmental managers to evaluate trade-offs involving risks and costs, as well as identify management solutions that sufficiently hedge against dual uncertainties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baudrit C, Guyonnet D, Dubois D (2007) Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination. J Contam Hydrol 93:72–84
Blair AN, Ayyub BM, Bender WJ (2001) Fuzzy stochastic risk-based decision analysis with the mobile offshore base as a case study. Marine Struct 14:69–88
Bolster D, Barahona M, Dentz M, Fernandez-Garcia D, Sanchez-Vila X, Trinchero P, Valhondo C, Tartakovsky DM (2009) Probabilistic risk analysis of groundwater remediation strategies. Water Resour Res 45:W06413. doi:10.1029/2008WR007551
CEPA (China Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Environmental quality standard for surface water (GB3838-2002). Beijing
Chen SQ (2000) Comparing probabilistic and fuzzy set approaches for design in the presence of uncertainty. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Chen Z, Huang GH, Chakma A (2003) Hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for assessing environmental risks at contaminated groundwater systems. J Environ Eng 129:79–88
Chu HJ, Chang LC (2009) Application of optimal control and fuzzy theory for dynamic groundwater remediation design. Water Resour Manage 23:647–660
Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory: an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty. Plenum Press, New York
Ferson S, Ginzburg LR (1996) Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 54:133–144
Fishman GS (1995) Monte Carlo: concepts algorithms, and applications. Springer, New York
Freeze RA, Massmann JM, Smith L, Sperling T, James B (1990) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. A framework. Ground Water 28:738–766
Guo P, Huang GH (2009) Two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained programming: application to water resources management under dual uncertainties. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:349–359
Gutiérrez S, Fernandez C, Barata C, Tarazona JV (2009) Forecasting risk along a river basin using a probabilistic and deterministic model for environmental risk assessment of effluents through ecotoxicological evaluation and GIS. Sci Total Environ 408:294–303
Guyonnet D, Côme B, Perrochet P, Parriaux A (1999) Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainty in risk assessment. J Environ Eng 125:660–666
Guyonnet D, Bourgine B, Dobois D, Fargier H, Côme B, Chilés JP (2003) Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessment. J Environ Eng 129:68–78
Hanss W (2002) The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 130:277–289
Hou Z, Rubin Y (2005) On minimum relative entropy concepts and prior compatibility issues in vadose zone inverse and forward modeling. Water Resour Res 41:W12425. doi:10.1029/2005WR004082
Hu BX, Huang H (2002) Stochastic analysis of reactive solute transport in heterogeneous, fractured porous media: a dual-permeability approach. Transp Porous Med 48:1–39
Huyakorn PS, Ungs MJ, Mulkey LA, Sudicky EA (1987) A three-dimensional analytical method for predicting leachate migration. Ground Water 25:588–598
James BR, Gorelick SM (1994) When enough is enough: the worth of monitoring data in aquifer remediation design. Water Resour Res 30:3499–3513
Kentel E, Aral MM (2004) Probabilistic-fuzzy health risk modeling. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 18:324–338
Kentel E, Aral MM (2005) 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 19:86–96
Kentel E, Aral MM (2007) Risk tolerance measure for decision-making in fuzzy analysis: a health risk assessment perspective. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21:405–417
Khadam IM, Kaluarachehi JJ (2004) Probabilistic risk assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis for the management of contaminated subsurface environments. Dev Water Sci 55:1201–1213
Kikuchi S, Pursula M (1998) Treatment of uncertainty in study of transportation: fuzzy set theory and evidence theory. J Transp Eng 124:1–8
Kumar V, Mari M, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (2009) Partitioning total variance in risk assessment: application to a municipal solid waste incinerator. Environ Model Softw 24:247–261
Li JB, Huang GH, Chakma A, Zeng GM, Liu L (2003) Integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling of petroleum contamination in subsurface. Energ Source 25:547–563
Li JB, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Maqsood I, Huang YF (2007) An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination. J Environ Manage 82:173–188
Liu L, Cheng SY, Guo HC (2004) A simulation-assessment modeling approach for analyzing environmental risks of groundwater contamination at waste landfill sites. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:373–388
Maqsood I, Li JB, Huang GH (2003) Inexact multiphase modeling system for the management of uncertainty in subsurface contamination. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 7:86–94
Massmann J, Freeze RA, Smith L, Sperling T, James B (1991) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 2 Applications to ground-water contamination. Ground Water 29:536–548
Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE (1999a) A model for assessing and managing the risks of environmental lead emissions. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 13:231–250
Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE (1999b) Stochastic environmental risk analysis: an integrated methodology for predicting cancer risk from contaminated groundwater. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 13:27–47
Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE, Rubin Y (1999) A methodology to integrate site characterization information into groundwater-driven health risk assessment. Water Resour Res 35:2841–2855
Mckone TE, Deshpande AW (2005) Can fuzzy logic bring complex environmental problems into focus? Environ Sci Technol 2005(39):42A–47A
Mylopoulos YA, Theodosiou N, Mylopoulos NA (1999) A stochastic optimization approach in the design of an aquifer remediation under hydrogeologic uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 13:335–351
Qin XS, Huang GH (2009) An inexact chance-constrained quadratic programming model for stream water quality management. Water Resour Manage 23:661–695
Qin XS, Huang GH, Chakma A, Zeng GM, Xi BD (2007) A fuzzy composting process model. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 57:535–550
Qin XS, Huang GH, Li YP (2008) Risk management of BTEX contamination in ground water—an integrated fuzzy approach. Ground Water 46:755–767
Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP (2007) Simulation and the Monte Carlo method, 2nd ed. edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ, Imran SA, Najjaran H (2007) Communicating human health risks associated with disinfection by-products in drinking water supplies: a fuzzy-based approach. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21:341–353
Seuntjens P (2002) Field-scale cadmium transport in a heterogeneous layered soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 140:401–423
Sperling T, Freeze RA, Massmann J, Smith L, James B (1992) Hydrogeological decision analysis: 3. Application to design of a ground-water control system at an open pit mine. Ground Water 30:376–389
Tartakovsky DM (2007) Probabilistic risk analysis in subsurface hydrology. Geophys Res Lett 34:L05404. doi:10.1029/2007GL029245(2007)
Terracini B (1996) Cancer hazard identification and qualitative risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 184:91–95
Thomann RV, Mueller JA (1987) Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. Harper & Row, New York
USEPA (2009) National primary drinking water regulations. EPA 816-F-09-0004, May 2009
Wood KL, Antonsson EK (1990) Modeling imprecision and uncertainty in preliminary engineering design. Mech Mach Theory 25:305–324
Woodbury AD, Ulrych TJ (1993) Minimum relative entropy: Forward probabilistic modeling. Water Resour Res 29:2847–2860
Yang AL, Huang GH, Qin XS (2010) An integrated simulation-assessment approach for evaluating health risks of groundwater contamination under multiple uncertainties. Water Resour Manage. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9610-3.
Yeh GT (1981) AT123D: Analytical transient one-, two-, and three-dimensional simulation of waste transport in the aquifer system. Oak Ridge National Lab., Report No. ORNL-5602
Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Nanyang Technological University (NTU) start-up grant (SUG-M58030007) and the DHI-NTU Water and Environment Research Centre. The author also deeply appreciates the reviewers and the editor for their insightful reviews. The provided comments/suggestions have contributed much to improving the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, X.S. Assessing environmental risks through fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26, 43–58 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0454-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0454-4