Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fuzzy-probabilistic calculations of water-balance uncertainty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrogeological systems are often characterized by imprecise, vague, inconsistent, incomplete, or subjective information, which may limit the application of conventional stochastic methods in predicting hydrogeologic conditions and associated uncertainty. Instead, predictions and uncertainty analysis can be made using uncertain input parameters expressed as probability boxes, intervals, and fuzzy numbers. The objective of this paper is to present the theory for, and a case study as an application of, the fuzzy-probabilistic approach, combining probability and possibility theory for simulating soil water balance and assessing associated uncertainty in the components of a simple water-balance equation. The application of this approach is demonstrated using calculations with the RAMAS Risk Calc code, to assess the propagation of uncertainty in calculating potential evapotranspiration, actual evapotranspiration, and infiltration—in a case study at the Hanford site, Washington, USA. Propagation of uncertainty into the results of water-balance calculations was evaluated by changing the types of models of uncertainty incorporated into various input parameters. The results of these fuzzy-probabilistic calculations are compared to the conventional Monte Carlo simulation approach and estimates from field observations at the Hanford site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arora VK (2002) The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff. J Hydrol 265:164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budyko MI (1974) Climate and life. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang N-B (2005) Sustainable water resources management under uncertainty. Stochast Environ Res Risk Assess 19:97–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JA, Ferson S, Ginzburg L (2006) Hybrid processing of stochastic and subjective uncertainty data. Risk Anal 16(6):785–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Stat 28:325–339

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (1996) Final environmental impact statement for the tank waste remediation system. Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, DOE/EIS-0189. http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/enviro/eis-0189/app_i_3.htm

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1981) Additions of interactive fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 26:926–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1994) Possibility theory and data fusion in poorly informed environments. Control Eng Pract 2(5):811–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S (2002) RAMAS risk calc 4.0 software: risk assessment with uncertain numbers. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson S, Ginzburg L (1995) Hybrid arithmetic. In: Proceedings of the 1995 joint ISUMA/NAFIPS conference. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, California, pp 619–623

  • Ferson S, Kreinovich V, Ginzburg L, Myers DS, Sentz K (2003) Constructing probability boxes and Dempster-Shafer structures, SAND report, SAND2002-4015

  • Gee GW, Fayer MJ, Rockhold ML, Campbell MD (1992) Variations in recharge at the Hanford Site. Northwest Sci 66:237–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Oostrom M, Freshley MD, Rockhold ML, Zachara JM (2007) Hanford site vadose zone studies: an overview. Vadose Zone J 6:899–905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guyonne D, Dubois D, Bourgine B, Fargier H, Côme B, Chilès J-P (2003) Hybrid method for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J Environ Eng 129:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1985) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher K, DePaolo DJ, Conrad MS, Serne RJ (2003) Vadose zone infiltration rate at Hanford, Washington, inferred from Sr isotope measurements. Water Resour Res 39(8):1204–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer PD, Rockhold ML, Gee GW (1997) Uncertainty Analysis of infiltration and subsurface flow and transport for SDMP sites, NUREG/CR-6565, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • Möller B, Beer M (2005) Fuzzy randomness. Uncertainty in Civil Engineering and Computational Mechanics. Comput Mech 36(1):83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitzel DA (1996) Hanford site national environmental policy act (NEPA) characterization. PNL-6415, Rev. 8. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

  • Neuman SP (2003) Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of alternative conceptual-mathematical models. Stochast Environ Res Risk Assess 17(5):291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP, Wierenga PJ (2003) A comprehensive strategy of hydrogeologic modeling and uncertainty analysis for nuclear facilities and sites, NUREG/CR-6805. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr S, Meystel AM (2005) Approaches to optimal aquifer management and intelligent control in a multiresolutional decision support system. Hydrogeol J 13:223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman HL (1963) Vegetation and hydrology, Technical communication no. 53. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden, England, 125 pp

  • Potter NJ, Zhang L, Milly PCD, McMahon TA, Jakeman AJ (2005) Effects of rainfall seasonality and soil moisture capacity on mean annual water balance for Australian catchments. Water Resour Res 41, W06007

  • Routson RC, Johnson VG (1990) Recharge estimates for the Hanford site 200 areas plateau. Northwest Sci 64(3):150–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankarasubramanian A, Vogel RM (2003) Hydroclimatology of the continental United States. Geophys Res Lett 30(7):1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets P (1990) The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener T, Gupta HV (2005) Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AL, Freeman EJ, White MD, Zhang ZF (2005) STOMP: subsurface transport over multiple phases, version 1.0. Addendum: Sparse vegetation evapotranspiration model for the water-air-energy operational mode, PNNL-15465

  • Winter CL (2004) Stochastic hydrology: practical alternatives exist. Stochast Environ Res Risk Assess 18:271–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R, Kelman A (1996) Fusion of fuzzy information with considerations for compatibility, partial aggregation, and reinforcement. Int J Approx Reason 15(2):93–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye M, Neuman SP, Meyer PD (2004) Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of spatial variability models in unsaturated fractured tuff. Water Resour Res 40(5):W05113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye M, Neuman SP, Meyer PD, Pohlmann K (2005) Sensitivity analysis and assessment of prior model probabilities in MLBMA with application to unsaturated fractured tuff. Water Resour Res 41:W12429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1986) A Simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. AI Mag 7:85–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Critical and constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers, Stefan Finsterle of LBNL and Ming Ye of Florida State University are very much appreciated. Scott Ferson of Applied Biomathematics, the developer of the RAMAS Risk Calc code, provided a number of publications related to this software. This work was partially supported by the LBNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program, the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program within the DOE Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative, and the Director, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Remediation Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, MS 90-1116, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Boris Faybishenko

Authors
  1. Boris Faybishenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Faybishenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faybishenko, B. Fuzzy-probabilistic calculations of water-balance uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24, 939–952 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0379-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0379-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation