Abstract
Introducing non-native species can create serious environmental risks, such as changing the attributes of ecosystem, displacing the native species, clogging the natural waterways and channels. Careful examination of the possible consequences before implementation can prevent the adverse consequences of invasive species. However, policy analysis for such an action is often difficult, due to the complexity of the marine environment, and the interactions among the species therein.
This paper presents a spatial-explicit agent-based simulation model for analyzing the environmental risks of introducing non-native species, Suminoe oyster (Crassostrea ariakensis). It is considered to be introduced into the Chesapeake Bay, USA, where there is a native Oyster species (Eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica) with declining population. The simulation result indicates that the non-native species will likely displace the native species, but this can be controlled by setting up a different harvest plan, and the location and the number of initial spat introduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batabyal AA (2007) International aspects of invasive species management: a research agenda. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:717–727
Batabyal AA, Nijkamp P (2005) On container versus time based inspection policies in invasive species management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:340–347
Bobashev GV, Goedecke DM, Yu F, Epstein JM (2007) A hybrid Epidemic model: combing the advantages of Agent-based and equation-based approaches. Proceedings of the Winter simulation conference, Washington DC, pp 1532–1537
Burreson EM, Stokes NA, Friedman CS (2000) Increased virulence in an introduced pathogen: Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica. J Aquat Anim Health 12:1–8
Bushek D, Kornbluh A, Debrosse G, Wang H, Guo X (2007) Oyster sex wars: evidence for a ‘gamete sink’ if Crassostrea virginica and Crassostrea ariakensis spawn synchronously. 98th annual meeting of the national shellfisheries association in monterey California, 26–30 March 2006
Calvo GW, Luckenbach MW, Allen SK Jr, Burreson EM (2000) A Comparative Field Study of Crassostrea Ariakensis and Crassostrea Virginica in Relation to Salinity in Virginia. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 360
Dew J, Berkson J, Hallerman E (2003) A model for assessing the likelihood of extinction of individual populations of eastern oysters (Crassostrae Virginica) in Chesapeake Bay. Fish Bull 101:758–768
Gangnery A, Cedric B, Buestel D (2004) Modelling oyster population dynamics in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Thau, France): sensitivity of marketable production to environmental conditions. Aquaculture 230:323–347
GISP (2003). Invasive alien species—A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practice. Global Invasive Species Programme. http://www.cabi-bioscience.ch/wwwgisp/index.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2007
Gottlieb SJ, Schweighofer ME (1996) Oysters and the Chesapeake Bay ecosystems: a case for exotic species introduction to improve environmental quality? Estuaries 19(3):639–650
Honkoop PJC, Bayne BL (2002) Stocking density and growth of the pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and the Sydney rock oyster (Saccostrea glomerata) in Port Stephens, Australia. Aquaculture 213:171–186
Langdon CJ, Robinson AM (1996) Aquaculture potential of the Suminoe oyster (Crassostrea ariakensis Fugita 1913). Aquaculture 144:321–338
Lipton D (2008) Economic benefits of a restored oyster fishery in Chesapeake Bay. J Shellfish Res 27(3):619–623
Mann R, Evans DA (1998) Estimation of oyster, Crassostrea Virginica, standing stock, larval production and advective loss in relation to observed recruitment in the James River, Virginia. J Shellfish Res 17(1):239–253
Merritt DW, Allen SK Jr, Freeman A, Kingsley-Smith P (2005) Evaluation of gametogenesis and spawning cues in diploid Crassostrea ariakensis for estimations of environmental risk and establishment of diploid brood stock populations. Report submitted to Maryland Department of Natural Resources, December 12, 2005
Nell JA (2002) Faming triploid oysters. Aquaculture 210:69–88
North EW, Schlag Z, Hood R, Zhong L, Li M, Gross T (2006) Modeling dispersal of Crassostrea ariakensis oyster larvae in Chesapeake Bay. Final report to Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Pereira A, Duarte P, Reis LP (2004) Agent-Based Simulation of Ecological Models. In: Coelho H, Espinasse B (eds) Proceedings of the 5th workshop on agent-based simulation. (@)SCS Europe BVBA, 2004, ISBN 3-936150-31-1
Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288
Politopoulos I (2007) Review and analysis of agent-based models in biology. Technical reports, Computer Science Department, University of Liverpool. www.csc.liv.ac.uk/research/techreports/. Accessed 31 Dec 2007
Ranjan R (2006) Economic impacts of Pink Hibiscus Mealybug in Florida and the United states. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 20:353–362. doi:10.1007/s00477-005-0027-0
Tarnowski M (2007) Maryland oyster population status report—2006 Fall Survey. Maryland Department of Natural Resources Fishery Services
Tesfatsion L (2006) Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory. Handbook of computational economics. In: Tesfatsion L, Kenneth L (eds) Agent-based computational economics. Handbooks in Economics Series, vol 2, pp 831–880. Elsevier, North-Holland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, M., Opaluch, J.J. Analyze the risks of biological invasion. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25, 377–388 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0375-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0375-2