Variability comparisons for some mixture models with stochastic environments in biosciences and engineering

  • Laureano F. Escudero
  • Eva María Ortega
  • José Alonso
Original Paper

Abstract

Statistical modeling of the dependence within applied stochastic models has become an important goal in many fields of science, since Pearson’s correlation does not provide a complete description of the dependence structure of the random variables, being strongly affected from extreme endpoints, and correlation zero does not imply independence, except in the case of multivariate normal distributions. The construction of bounds for the variability of the distributions of some applied stochastic models when there is only partial information on the dependence structure of the models is the main purpose of this paper. We consider stochastic models in engineering, hydrology, and biosciences, that are defined by mixtures with stochastic environmental parameters. We study stochastic monotonicity and directional convexity properties of some functionals of random variables that are used to define these models. Variability comparisons between the mixture models in terms of the dependence between the stochastic environments are obtained. Stochastic bounds and examples are derived from modeling the dependence structure by some known notions.

Keywords

Stochastic orders Dependence Variability Bounds Stochastic directional convexity Environmental modeling Biology Hydrology Communication networks Engineering Risk management Medicine 

References

  1. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations, and communities, 3a edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Belzunce F, Ortega EM, Ruiz JM (2009) Ageing properties of a discrete-time failure and repair model. IEEE Trans Reliab 58:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (2000) Reliability. Modeling, prediction and optimization. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang C-S, Shanthikumar JG, Yao DD (1994) Stochastic convexity and stochastic majorization. In: Yao DD (ed) Stochastic modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. Ser Oper ResGoogle Scholar
  5. Cigizoglu HK, Bayazit M (2000) A generalized seasonal model for flow duration curve. Hydrol Process 14:1053–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dracup JA, Lee KS, Paulson EG (1980) On the statistical characteristics of drought events. Water Resour Res 16:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Escudero LF, Ortega EM (2008) Actuarial comparisons of aggregate claims with randomly right truncated claims. Insur Math Econ 43:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang Y (2005) Modeling and performance analysis for wireless mobile networks: a new analytical approach. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 13:989–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández-Ponce JM, Ortega EM, Pellerey F (2008) Convex comparisons for random sums in random environments and applications. Probab Eng Inform Sci 22:389–413Google Scholar
  10. Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J Anim Ecol 12:42–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foerster J (2003) UWB channel modeling sub-committee report final. IEEE P802.15 working group for wireless personal area networks (February 2003)Google Scholar
  12. Genest C, Marceau E, Mesfioui M (2002) Upper stop-loss bounds for sums of possibly dependent risks with given means and variances. Stat Probab Lett 57:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goovaerts M, Dhaene J, De Schepper A (2000) Stochastic upper bounds for present value functions. J Risk Insur 67:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris TE (1963) The theory of branching processes. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Jagers P, Klebaner FC (2000) Population-size-dependent and age-dependent branching processes. Stoch Process Appl 87:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaas R, Dhaene J, Goovaerts M (2000) Upper and lower bounds for sums of random variables. Insur Math Econ 27:151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalashnikov V (1997) Geometric sums: bounds for rare events with applications. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Lánský P (1996) A stochastic model for circulatory transport in pharmacokinetics. Math Biosci 132:141–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Marinacci M, Montrucchio L (2005) Ultramodular functions. Math Oper Res 30:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meester LE, Shanthikumar JG (1993) Regularity of stochastic processes. A theory based on directional convexity. Probab Eng Inform Sci 7:343–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meester LE, Shanthikumar JG (1999) Stochastic convexity on general space. Math Oper Res 24:472–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nadarajah S (2008) A review of results on sums of random variables. Acta Appl Math 103:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakagami M (1960) The m-distribution general formula of intensity distribution of rapid fading. In: Statistical methods in radio wave propagation. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 3–36Google Scholar
  25. Oloffson P (1996) Branching processes with local dependencies. Ann Appl Probab 6:238–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ortega EM, Escudero LF (2008) On expected utility for financial insurance portfolios with stochastic dependencies. Eur J Oper Res (online first)Google Scholar
  27. Podolski H (1972) The distribution of a product of n independent random variables with generalized gamma distribution. Demonstratio Mathematica 4:119–123Google Scholar
  28. Romeo M, Da Costa V, Bardou F (2003) Broad distribution effects in sums of lognormal random variables. Eur Phys J B32:513–525Google Scholar
  29. Rüschendorf L (2004) Comparison of multivariate risks and positive dependence. Adv Appl Probab 41:391–406Google Scholar
  30. Sakamoto H (1943) On the distributions of the product and the quotient of the independent and uniformly distributed random variables. Tohoku Math J 49:243–260Google Scholar
  31. Scaillet O (2006) A Kolmogorov-Smirnov type test for positive quadrant dependence. Can J Stat 33:415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (1990) Parametric stochastic convexity and concavity of stochastic processes. Ann Inst Stat Math 42:509–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (2007) Stochastic orders. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stoyan D (1983) Comparisons methods for queues and other stochastic models. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Stuart A (1962) Gamma-distributed products of independent random variables. Biometrika 49:564–565Google Scholar
  36. Weiss M (1984) A note on the role of generalized Inverse Gaussian distribution of circulatory transit times in pharmacokinetics. J Math Biol 20:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Willmot G, Lin X (2001) Lundberg approximations for compounds distributions with insurance applications. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Wright EM (1954) An inequality for convex functions. Am Math Mon 61:620–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yaari ME (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55:95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang DW, Nadarajah S (2006) Drought modeling and products of random variables with exponential kernel. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Y, Soong BH (2004) Channel holding time in hierarchical cellular systems. IEEE Commun Lett 8:614–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laureano F. Escudero
    • 1
  • Eva María Ortega
    • 2
  • José Alonso
    • 3
  1. 1.Dpto. Estadística e Investigación OperativaUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMóstoles (Madrid)Spain
  2. 2.Centro de Investigación OperativaUniversidad Miguel HernándezOrihuela (Alicante)Spain
  3. 3.Servicio de RadiologíaHospital Universitario Virgen ArrixacaEl Palmar (Murcia)Spain

Personalised recommendations