Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?” by Jasper A. Vrugt, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Hoshin V. Gupta and Bruce A. Robinson

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Beven KJ (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 320:18–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (2008) Environmental modelling: an uncertain future? Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Smith PJ, Freer JE (2008) So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent? J Hydrol 354:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt JA, ter Braak CJF, Gupta HV, Robinson BA (2008) Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0274-y

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith J. Beven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beven, K.J. Comment on “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?” by Jasper A. Vrugt, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Hoshin V. Gupta and Bruce A. Robinson. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23, 1059–1060 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0283-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0283-x

Keywords

Navigation