Skip to main content
Log in

Planning of municipal solid waste management systems under dual uncertainties: a hybrid interval stochastic programming approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a random-boundary-interval linear programming (RBILP) method is developed and applied to the planning of municipal solid waste (MSW) management under dual uncertainties. In the RBILP model, uncertain inputs presented as interval numbers can be directly communicated into the optimization process; besides, intervals with uncertain lower and upper bounds can be handled through introducing the concept of random boundary interval. Consequently, robustness of the optimization process can be enhanced. To handle uncertainties with such complex presentations, an integrated chance-constrained programming and interval-parameter linear programming approach (ICCP) is proposed. ICCP can help analyze the reliability of satisfying (or risk of violating) system constraints under uncertainty. The applicability of the proposed RBILP and ICCP approach is validated through a case study of MSW management. Violations for capacity constraints are allowed under a range of significant levels. Interval solutions associated with different risk levels of constraint violation are obtained. They can be used for generating decision alternatives and thus helping waste managers to identify desired policies under various environmental, economic, and system-reliability constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang NB, Wang SF (1997) A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems. J Oper Res 32:303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW (1959) Chance-constrained programming. Manag Sci 6:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Kirby P (1972) Chance constrained programming: an extension of statistical method. In: Optimizing methods in statistics, Academic Press, New York, pp 391–402

  • Chi GF, Huang GH (1998) Long-term planning of integrated solid waste management system under uncertainty. University of Regina Report submitted to the City of Regina, Saskatchewan

  • Ellis JH (1991) Stochastic programs for identifying critical structural collapse mechanisms. Appl Math Model 15:367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH (1998) A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model. Eur J Oper Res 107:137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Chang NB (2003) The perspectives of environmental informatics and systems analysis. J Environ Inform 1:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1992) An interval linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civil Eng Syst 9:319–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1993) A grey fuzzy linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civil Eng Syst 10:123–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1994a) Grey dynamic programming (GDP) for solid waste management planning under uncertainty. J Urban Plan Dev (ASCE) 120:132–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1994b) Grey chance-constrained programming: application to regional solid waste management planning. In: Hipel KW, Fang L (eds) Effective environmental management for sustainable development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995a) Grey integer programming: an application to waste management planning under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 83:594–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1995b) Grey fuzzy integer programming: an application to regional waste management planning under uncertainty. Socioecon Plann Sci 29:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Sae-Lim N, Liu L et al (2001) An interval-parameter fuzzy-stochastic programming approach for municipal solid waste management and planning. Environ Model Assess 6:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YF, Baetz BW, Huang GH et al (2002) Violation analysis for solid waste management systems: an interval fuzzy programming approach. J Environ Manage 65:431–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo P, Huang GH, He L (2007) ISMISIP: an inexact stochastic mixed integer linear semi-infinite programming approach for solid waste management and planning under uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi: 10.1007/s00477-007-0185-3.

  • Infanger G (1993) Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic linear programs. Ann Oper Res 39:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infanger G, Morton DP (1996) Cut sharing for multistage stochastic linear programs with interstage dependency. Math Program 75:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Inuiguchi M, Ichihashi H, Tanaka H (1990) Fuzzy programming: a survey of recent developments. In: Slowinski R, Teghem J (eds) Stochastic versus fuzzy approaches to multiobjective mathematical programming under uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrechts, pp 45–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1994) Continuous univariate distributions, vol 1. Wiley, New York

  • Kim JH, Mays LW (1992) Rehabilitation and replacement of water distribution system components considering uncertainties. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 4(4):277–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Kursad A, Hadi G (2007) A chance-constrained approach to stochastic line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 180:1098–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YW, Bogardi I, Stansbury J (1991) Fuzzy decision making in dredged-material management. J Environ Eng ASCE 117(2):614–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH (2006) Minimax regret analysis for municipal solid waste management: An interval-stochastic programming approach. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:931–944

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Nie SL, Nie XH, Maqsood I (2006) An interval-parameter two-stage stochastic integer programming model for environmental systems planning under uncertainty. Eng Optim 38(4):461–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Nie SL et al (2007) ITCLP: an inexact two-stage chance-constrained program for planning waste management systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 49:284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo B, Zhou DC (2007) Planning hydroelectric resources with recourse-based multistage interval-stochastic programming. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. Available on http://www.springerlink.com/content/103283

  • Maqsood I, Huang GH (2003) A two-stage interval-stochastic programming model for waste management under uncertainty. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 53:540–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Huang GH, Huang YF, Chen B (2005) ITOM: an interval-parameter two-stage optimization mode for stochastic planning of water resources systems. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19(2):125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris HD, Mark JS (2001) Special distributions: the normal distribution. In: Probability and statistics, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Publishers, pp 194–205

  • Nie XH, Huang GH, Li YP et al (2007) IFRP: a hybrid interval-parameter fuzzy robust programming approach for waste management planning under uncertainty. J Environ Manag 84:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roubcns M, Teghem J (1991) Comparison of methodologies for fuzzy and stochastic multi-objective programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst 42:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil S (1993) Integrated solid waste management. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Ellis JH (1994) A joint chance-constrained programming model with row dependence. Eur J Oper Res 77:325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JS, Huang GH (2003) An evolutionary grey, hop, skip, and jump approach: generating alternative policies for the expansion of waste management. J Environ Inform 1:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JS, Huang GH, Yoogalingam R (2003) Combining simulation with evolutionary algorithms for optimal planning under uncertainty: an application to municipal solid waste management planning in the Reginonal Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth. J Environ Inform 2:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare Y, Daneshmand A (1995) A linear approximation method for solving a special class of the chance constrained programming problem. Eur J Oper Res 80:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Trauth KM (2005) Internet-based fuzzy multicriteria decision support system for planning integrated solid waste management. J Environ Inform 6:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of MOST (2005CB724200 and 2006CB403307) and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors are grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. H. Huang.

Appendix: Definitions regarding interval numbers

Appendix: Definitions regarding interval numbers

Definition A1

Let x denotes a closed set of real numbers. An interval number x ± is defined as an interval with known upper and lower bounds but unknown distribution information for x. That is x ± = [x , x +] = {tx|x  ≤ t ≤ x +}, where x and x + are the lower and upper bounds of x ±, respectively. When x  x +, x ± becomes a deterministic number.

Definition A2

For x ±, the following relationships holds: x ± ≥ 0, iff x  ≥ 0 and x +≥0; x ± ≤ 0, iff x  ≤ 0 and x +≤0.

Definition A3

For x ± and y ±, the order relations are as follows: x ± ≥ y ±, iff x  ≥ y and x + ≥ y +; x ± = y ±, iff x  = y and x + = y +; x ± > y ±, iff x ± ≥ y ± and x ± ≠ y ±.

Definition A4

For x ±, Sign(x ± ) is defined as \( {\text{Sign}}(x^{ \pm } ) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 1 & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ + } \ge 0} \\ { - 1} & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ + }\,<\,0} \\ \end{array} } \right.. \)

Definition A5

For x ±, its absolute value |x|± is defined as \( \left| x \right|^{ \pm } = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {x^{ \pm } } & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ \pm } \ge 0} \\ { - x^{ \pm } } & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ \pm }\,<\,0} \\ \end{array} } \right.. \) Thus, we have \( \left| x \right|^{ - } = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {x^{ - } } & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ \pm } \ge 0} \\ { - x^{ + } } & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ \pm }\,<\,0} \\ \end{array} } \right. \) and \( \left| x \right|^{ + } = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {x^{ + } } & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ \pm } \ge 0} \\ { - x^{ - } } & {{\text{if}}\,x^{ \pm }\,<\,0} \\ \end{array} } \right.. \)

Definition A6

Let R ± denote a set of interval numbers. An interval vector X ± is a tupel of interval numbers, and an interval matrix Y ± is a matrix whose elements are interval numbers: X ± = {x i ± = x i , x + i ] | for any i} ∈ {R ±}1 × n, Y ± = {y ± ij  = [y ij , y + ij ] | for any i, j} ∈ {R ±}m×n.

Definition A7

In this paper, for interval vectors or matrices: X ± ≥/≤ 0 iff x ± ij  ≥/≤ 0 for any i and j, where X ± ∈ {R ±}m × n(≥ 1, and m = integer).

Definition A8

Let * ∈ {+ , −, × , ÷} be a binary operation on interval numbers. For x ± and y ±: x ± * y ±  = [min (y), max (y)], x  ≤ x ≤ x +, y  ≤ y ≤ y +. In the case of division, it is assumed that y ± does not contain zero. Hence x ± + y ±= [ x  + y , x + + y +]; x ± − y ± = [ x y +, x +y ]; x ± ×  y ±  = [min (x × y), max (x × y)], x  ≤ x ≤ x +, y  ≤ y ≤ y +; x ± ÷ y ±  = [min (x÷y), max (x÷y)], x  ≤ x ≤ x +, y  ≤ y ≤ y +.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, G.H., Huang, G.H., Li, Y.P. et al. Planning of municipal solid waste management systems under dual uncertainties: a hybrid interval stochastic programming approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23, 707–720 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0251-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0251-5

Keywords

Navigation