Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Convergence of deterministic and stochastic approaches in optimal remediation design of a contaminated aquifer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The comparison between two series of optimal remediation designs using deterministic and stochastic approaches showed a number of converging features. Limited sampling measurements in a supposed contaminated aquifer formed the hydraulic conductivity field and the initial concentration distribution used in the optimization process. The deterministic and stochastic approaches employed a single simulation–optimization method and a multiple realization approach, respectively. For both approaches, the optimization model made use of a genetic algorithm. In the deterministic approach, the total cost, extraction rate, and the number of wells used increase when the design must satisfy the intensified concentration constraint. Growing the stack size in the stochastic approach also brings about same effects. In particular, the change in the selection frequency of the used extraction wells, with increasing stack size, for the stochastic approach can indicate the locations of required additional wells in the deterministic approach due to the intensified constraints. These converging features between the two approaches reveal that a deterministic optimization approach with controlled constraints is achievable enough to design reliable remediation strategies, and the results of a stochastic optimization approach are readily available to real contaminated sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aly AH, Peralta RC (1999) Optimal design of aquifer cleanup systems under uncertainty using a neural network and a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 35:2523–2532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baú DA, Mayer AS (2006) Stochastic management of pump-and-treat strategies using surrogate functions. Adv Water Resour 29:1901–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan Hilton AB, Culver TB (2000) Constraint handling for genetic algorithms in optimal remediation design. J Water Resour Plann Manage 126:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyen L, Goelick SM (2004) Reliable groundwater management in hydroecologically sensitive areas. Water Resour Res 40:W07408. doi:10.1029/2003WR003003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyen L, Goelick SM (2005) Framework to evaluate the worth of hydraulic conductivity data for optimal groundwater resources management in ecologically sensitive areas. Water Resour Res 41:W03019. doi:10.1029/2003WR002901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, Gorelick SM (1999) Convergence of stochastic optimization and decision analysis in the engineering design of aquifer remediation. Ground Water 37:934–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick SM (1983) A review of distributed parameter ground water management modeling method. Water Resour Res 19:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan J, Aral MM (2005) Remediation system design with multiple uncertain parameters using fuzzy sets and genetic algorithm. J Hydrolog Eng 10:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh AW, McDonald MG (1996) User’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the US Geological Survey modular finite–difference ground-water flow model, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-485, US Geological Survey, Virginia

  • Huang C, Mayer AS (1997) Pump-and-treat optimization using well locations and pumping rates as decision variables. Water Resour Res 33:1001–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juang K-W, Lee D-Y, Ellsworth TR (2001) Using rank-order geostatistics for spatial interpolation of highly skewed data. J Environ Qualit 30:894–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko NY, Lee KK, Hyun Y (2005) Optimal groundwater remediation design of a pump and treat system considering clean-up time. Geosci J 9:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer AS, Kelley CT, Miller CT (2002) Optimal design for problems involving flow and transport phenomena in saturated subsurface system. Adv Water Resour 25:1233–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DR, Eheart JW, Valocchi AJ (1993) Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique. Water Resour Res 29:551–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olea RA (1999) Geostatistics for engineers and earth scientists. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder GF, Ricciardi K, Karatzas GP, Wobber F, Roesler G (2001) Least-cost groundwater remediation using uncertain hydrogeological information (final report). US Department of Energy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed PM, Ellsworth TR, Minsker BS (2004) Spatial interpolation methods for non-stationary plume data. Ground Water 42:190–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren X, Minsker B (2005) Which groundwater remediation objective is better: a realistic one or simple one? J Water Res Plann Manage 131:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer CS, Lin Y-F (1998) Mixed-integer chance-constrained models for ground-water remediation. J Water Res Plann Manage 124:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Groundwater cleanup: overview of operating experience at 28 sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner BJ (1995) Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling. Review of geophysics US national report to international union of geodesy and geophysics 1991–1994:1021–1028

  • Wagner BJ (1999) Evaluating data worth for ground-water management under uncertainty. J Water Resour Plann Manage 125:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner BJ, Gorelick SM (1987) Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty. Water Resour Res 23:1162–1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner BJ, Gorelick SM (1989) Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity: from data to design. Water Resour Res 25:2211–2225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Zheng C (1997) Optimal remediation policy selection under general condition. Ground Water 35:757–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins Jr DW, McKinney DC (1997) Finding robust solutions to water resources problems. J Water Resour Plann Manage 123:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Wang PP (1999) MT3DMS: a modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems: Documentation and User’s Guide, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Contract Report SERDP-99-1, Mississippi

  • Zheng C, Wang PP (2002) A field demonstration of the simulation optimization approach for remediation system design. Ground Water 40:258–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Advanced Environmental Biotechnology Research Center (AEBRC) at POSTECH. Sustainable Water Resources Research Center of 21st Century Frontier Research Program (# 3-4-3), and partly by Korea Energy Management Corporation (KEMCO) through KIGAM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kang-Kun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ko, NY., Lee, KK. Convergence of deterministic and stochastic approaches in optimal remediation design of a contaminated aquifer. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23, 309–318 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0216-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0216-8

Keywords

Navigation