Abstract
Despite the dust cleanup and indoor air testing program led by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and offered to all residents of Lower Manhattan (south of Canal Street), concern remains about local chemical residues from the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. Data on post-cleanup indoor airborne asbestos concentration, available from EPA Region 2, were analyzed to assess the possibility that the WTC site is the source of geographically concentrated rare post-cleanup exceedances of the health-based standard for asbestos. Recognizing that these rare exceedances may be attributable to sources other than the WTC disaster, and that these sources are very likely to exhibit geographic patterns, the data were analyzed using a spatial filter specification of the auto-Poisson probability model. Our analysis shows that ignoring geographic patterns latent in these exceedances affects the empirical probability of exceeding the health-based standards for airborne asbestos. We did not find any statistically-significant geographic pattern in the exceedance events that would indicate the WTC site as the source of the post-cleanup exceedances. Apparent geographic patterns may be due to the geographic variability in sampling intensity. Our analysis indicates the Residential Dust Cleanup Program lead by EPA Region 2 has been effective at reducing the concentration of air-borne asbestos in indoor air to below the health-based benchmark.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander FE, Boyle P (1996) Methods for investigating localized clustering of disease. IARC Scientific Publications No. 135. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
Anselin L (2004) Review of cluster analysis software. Report in Fulfillment of Consultant Agreement#2003-04-01 with The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. September 27
ATSDR (2001) Toxicological profile for asbestos. Centers for Disease Control
Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Prentice Hall, London
Cannaughton JL (2003) Letter to Senators Clinton and Lieverman. October, 27. Available on-line: http://www.epa.gov/wtc/panel/pdfs/Clint-Lieb-ltr.pdf)
Cameron A, Trivedi P (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Depalma A (2006) City Council to Fault 9/11 Cleanup, New York Times, March 1. Available on-line: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/01/nyregion/01dust.html
Griffith D, Layne J (1999) A casebook for spatial statistical data analysis. Oxford University Press, NY
Griffith D (2002) A spatial filtering specification for the auto-Poisson model. Stat Probab Lett 58:245–251
Griffith D (2004) A spatial filtering specification for the auto-logistic model. Environ Plann A 36:1791–1811
Griffith D (2006) Assessing spatial dependence in count data: Winsorized and spatial filter specification alternatives to the auto-Poisson model. Geograph Anal 38(2):160–179
Hope A (1968) A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. J R Stat Soc 30B:582–598
Jenkins C (2003) Comments on the EPA Office of Inspector General’s 1/27/03 interim report titled: “EPA’s Response to the World Trade Center Towers Collapse,” A documentary basis for litigation memorandum. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC. July. Available on-line: http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/PDF/Jenkins-7-4-03-documentary-d2.pdf
Kulldorff M (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Communications in statistics: Theory Methods 26:1481–1496
McVay Hughes C (2004) Seven principles letter to EPA Administrator Michael Levitt. December, 17. Available on-line: http://www.911ea.org/7_Principles_Letter_to_Leavitt.Oct.26,2004,_updated. Dec.17, 2004.pdf
Skellam J (1946) The frequency distribution of the difference between two Poisson variates belonging to different populations. J R Stat Soc 10B:257–261
Tang et al. (2004) Env Sci Tech 38(24):6482–6490
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2003a) Interim Final WTC Residential Confirmation Cleaning Study. Volume 1. May. Available on-line: http://www.epa.gov/wtc/confirmation_clean_study.htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2003b) Background study report. Interim Final. April. Available on-line: http://www.epa.gov/wtc/backround_study.htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2003c) World Trade Center indoor environment assessment: selecting contaminants of potential concern and setting health-based benchmarks. Contaminants of Potential Concern Committee of the World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Workgroup. May. Available on-line: http://www.epa.gov/wtc/copc_study.htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) World Trade Center Residential Dust Cleanup Program. Draft Final Report. March. Available on-line: http://www.epa.gov/wtc/draft_final_report.htm
Acknowledgments
Daniel A. Griffith holds an Ashbel Smith chair in Geospatial Information Sciences. This work was supported, in part, by U.S. EPA grant R-83034501-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thayer, W.C., Griffith, D.A. & Diamond, G.L. Geography of asbestos contamination near the World Trade Center site. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21, 461–471 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0129-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0129-y