Skip to main content
Log in

Global sensitivity analysis for a numerical model of radionuclide migration from the RRC “Kurchatov Institute” radwaste disposal site

Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, in different countries, there exist sites with contaminated groundwater formed as a result of inappropriate handling or disposal of hazardous materials or wastes. Numerical modeling of such sites is an important tool for a correct prediction of contamination plume spreading and an assessment of environmental risks associated with the site. Many uncertainties are associated with a part of the parameters and the initial conditions of such environmental numerical models. Statistical techniques are useful to deal with these uncertainties. This paper describes the methods of uncertainty propagation and global sensitivity analysis that are applied to a numerical model of radionuclide migration in a sandy aquifer in the area of the RRC “Kurchatov Institute” radwaste disposal site in Moscow, Russia. We consider 20 uncertain input parameters of the model and 20 output variables (contaminant concentration in the observation wells predicted by the model for the end of 2010). Monte Carlo simulations allow calculating uncertainty in the output values and analyzing the linearity and the monotony of the relations between input and output variables. For the non monotonic relations, sensitivity analyses are classically done with the Sobol sensitivity indices. The originality of this study is the use of modern surrogate models (called response surfaces), the boosting regression trees, constructed for each output variable, to calculate the Sobol indices by the Monte Carlo method. It is thus shown that the most influential parameters of the model are distribution coefficients and infiltration rate in the zone of strong pipe leaks on the site. Improvement of these parameters would considerably reduce the model prediction uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Box GE, Draper NR (1987) Empirical model building and response surfaces. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GE, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Roy Statist Soc B B 13:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Campolongo F, Saltelli A (1997) Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: an application of different analysis methods. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 57:49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor N, Bolado Lavin R (2006) Uncertainty and sensitivity methods in support of PSA level 2, SARNET report, SARNET-PSA2-P06 Revision 0, European Commission, 2006

  • Downing DJ, Gardner RH, Hoffman FO (1985) An examination of response-surface methodologies for uncertainty analysis in assessment models. Technometrics 27:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2002) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC (1993) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment in radioactive waste disposal. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 42:327–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC, Davis FJ (2003) Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81:23–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iooss B, Ribatet M (2006) Analyse de sensibilité globale de modèles numériques à paramètres incontrôlables. In: Actes des XXXVIIIèmes Journées de Statistique, Clamart, France

  • Iooss B, Van Dorpe F, Devictor N (2006) Response surfaces and sensitivity analyses for an environmental model of dose calculations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:1241–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan A, Zabalza-Mezghani I (2005) Response surface designs for scenario management and uncertainty quantification in reservoir production. Math Geol 38:965–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil A, Almasri MN, McKee M, Kaluarachchi J (2004) Applicability of statistical learning algorithms in groundwater quality modelling. Water Resources Res DOI 10.1029/2004WR003608

  • Kleijnen JPC (1997) Sensitivity analysis and related analyses: a review of some statistical techniques. J Statist Comput Simul 57:111–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen JPC (2005) An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. Eur J Oper Res 164:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen JPC, Sargent RG (2000) A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation. Eur J Oper Res 120:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma HW (2002) Stochastic multimedia risk assessment for a site with contaminated groundwater. Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess 16:464–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddalena RL, McKone TE, Hsieh DPH, Geng S (2001) Influential input classification in probabilistic multimedia models. Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess 15:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrel A, Iooss B, Van Dorpe F, Volkova E (2006) An efficient methodology for modelling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes. Comput Statist Data Anal (submitted)

  • McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21:239–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist Sci 4:409–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott M (eds.) (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Probability and statistics series. Wiley, New York

  • Schapire R (1990) The strength of weak learnability. Mach Learn 5:197–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobol IM (2001) Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput Simul 55:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J Roy Statist Soc B 36:111–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarantola S, Giglioli N, Jesinghaus J, Saltelli A (2002) Can global sensitivity analysis steer the implementation of models for environmental assessments and decision making? Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess 16:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkov VG et al (2003) Status of activities on rehabilitation of radioactively contaminated facilities and the site of Russian Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”. In: Proceedings of WM’03 Conference, Tucson, Arizona, USA, February 23–27, 2003, WM Symposia Inc

  • Volkov VG et al (2004) The First Stage of Liquidation of Temporary Radwaste Repositories and Rehabilitation of the Radwaste Disposal Site at the Russian Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”. In: Proceedings of WM’04 Conference, Tucson, Arizona, USA, February 29 – March 4, 2004, WM Symposia Inc

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the MRIMP project of the “Risk Control Domain” which depends on CEA/Nuclear Energy Division/Nuclear Development and Innovation Division. This work is also a part of the Russian Research Center “Kurchatov Institute” Scientific and Technical Complex “Rehabilitation” project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Volkova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volkova, E., Iooss, B. & Van Dorpe, F. Global sensitivity analysis for a numerical model of radionuclide migration from the RRC “Kurchatov Institute” radwaste disposal site. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22, 17–31 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0093-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0093-y

Keywords

Navigation