Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk assessment of water erosion for the Qareh Aghaj subbasin, southern Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

South of the Zagros belt, the entire land of Southern Iran faces problems arising out of various types of land degradation of which water erosion forms a major type. A new model has been developed for assessing the risk of water erosion. Taking into consideration nine indicators of water erosion the model identifies areas with ‘Potential Risk’ (risky zones) and areas of ‘Actual Risk’ as well as projects the probability of the worse degradation in future. The Qareh Aghaj subbasin (1,265,000 ha), which covers the upper reaches of Mond River, has been chosen for a test risk assessment of this kind. The preparation of risk maps based on the GIS analysis of these indicators will be helpful for prioritizing the areas to initiate remedial measures. The different kinds of data for indicators of water erosion were gathered from the records and published reports of the governmental offices of Iran. By fixing the thresholds of severity classes of the nine indicators a hazard map for each indicator was first prepared in GIS. The risk classes were defined on the basis of risk scores arrived at by assigning the appropriate attributes to the indicators and the risk map was prepared by overlaying nine hazard maps in the GIS. Areas under potential risk have been found to be widespread (63%) in the basin and when classified into subclasses with different probability levels the model projects a statistical picture of the risk of land degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi H (1995) Applied geomorphology. Tehran University Publication, Iran, p 613

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi H, Abbas Abadi MR, Onagh M, Ekhtessasi MR (2001) Quantitative assessment of desertification in Aghqalla and Gomishan plain for creation of a regional model. Iran J Nat Resour 54:3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg N, Roby K, McGurk B (1995) Cumulative watershed effects: applicability of available methodologies to the Sierra Nevada: 1. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA 2. Plumas National Forest, Quincy, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges EM, Hannam ID, Oldeman LR, Penning de Vries FWT, Scherr SJ, Sombatpanit S (2001) Response to land degradation. Science publishers Inc, p 510

  • Costic LA (1996) Indexing current watershed conditions using remote sensing and GIS. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources

  • Delbaere B (2003) Environmental risk assessment for European agriculture: interim report. European Center for Nature Conservation, Tilburg

  • EEA (1999) Environment in the european union at the turn of the century. Environmental assessment report 2

  • FAO (1994) Land degradation in South Asia: its severity causes and effects upon the people. FAO, UNDP and UNEP report, Rome

  • FAO/UNEP (1984) Provisional methodology for assessment and mapping of desertification. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 84

  • Feiznia S, Gooya AN, Ahmadi H, Azarnivand H (2001) Investigation on desertification factors in Hossein-Abad Mish Mast plain and a proposal for a regional model. J Biaban 6(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Filho C, Cochrane TA, Norton LD, Caviglione JH, Johansson LP (2001) Land degradation assessment: tools and techniques for measuring sediment load. 3rd International conference on land degradation and meeting of the IUSS submission C–soil and water conservation, September 17–21, 2001, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (1995) USDA-Water erosion prediction project: Hillslope and watershed model documentation. NSERL Report No. 10.West Lafayette Ind. USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory

  • Ghadiri H (1987) Soil conservation. Ahvaz university publication, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobin A, Govers G (2003) Pan-European Soil Erosion Risk Assessment. Third Annual Report. European commission funded fifth framework project - contract QLK5-CT-1999-01323. Available at: http://www.pesera.JRC.it

  • Heilig GK (1999) China food. Can China Feed Itself? IIASA, Laxenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1998) Soil erosion at multiple scales: principles and methods for assessing causes and impacts. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Rickson JRJ (1992) Soil erosion prediction model for the Europian Community. GB-ISCO-WASWC

  • Musgrave GV (1947) The quantative evaluation of factors in water erosion, a first approximation. J Soil Water Conserv 2(3):133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton LD, Filho CC, Cocherane TA, Caviglion JH, Fontes HM, Johnsson LP, Marenda LD (2001) Monitoring the sediment loading of Itaipo lake and modeling of sheet and rill erosion hazards in watershed of Parana River: an outline of project. 10th international ISCO conference, May 1999

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). J Soil Water Conserv 41(1):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Institute of Planning and Agricultural Economics (2000) Complete studies for rehabilitation and development of agriculture and natural resource in the fars province: erosion and soil conservation report. Ministry of jahad and agriculture, Iran

  • Research Institute of Soil and Water (1994) Evaluation studies on the resources and capability of lands in the Fasa and Jahrom area. Research Institute of Soil and Water, Ministry of Agriculture, Iran

  • Rosewell CJ (1993) Soil loss, a program to assist in the selection of management practices to reduce erosion. Technical handbook, 2nd ed. Soil Conservation Service

  • Smith DD (1941) Interprtation of soil conservation data for field use. Agricultural Engineering 22:173–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi RP, Singh HP (1993) Soil erosion and conservation. New Age International (P) Ltd., New Delhi, p 305

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2000) Soil Erosion risk assessment in Europe, EUR 19044 EN, 34pp

  • Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1990) The EPIC model. United states department of agriculture (USDA) technical bulletin no. 1768

  • Wischemeier WH (1974) New developments in estimating water erosion. Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting. Soil Conserv Soc Amer 179–186

  • Wischemeier WH, Johnson CB, Cross BV (1971) A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J Soil Water Conserv 26:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischemeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. USDA, Agricultural handbook no. 537, Washington DC, USA

  • Zingg AW (1940) Degree and length of land slope as it affects soil loss in runoff. Agric Eng 21(2):59–64

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Government Offices of Iran, for providing the data, maps and reports for this risk assessment work. The grant of scholarship to M. Masoudi by the Iranian Ministry of Science and Technology facilitated this work, in the Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Pune, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Patwardhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masoudi, M., Patwardhan, A.M. & Gore, S.D. Risk assessment of water erosion for the Qareh Aghaj subbasin, southern Iran. Stoch Environ Res Ris Assess 21, 15–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0040-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0040-y

Keywords

Navigation