Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) is a collection of methodologies to compare, select, or rank multiple alternatives that typically involve incommensurate attributes. MCDM is well-suited for eliciting and modeling the flood preferences of stakeholders and for improving the coordination among flood agencies, organizations and affected citizens. A flood decision support system (DSS) architecture is put forth that integrates the latest advances in MCDM, remote sensing, GIS, hydrologic models, and real-time flood information systems. The analytic network process (ANP) is discussed with application to short-term flood management options for the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. It is shown that DSS and MCDM can improve flood risk planning and management under uncertainty by providing data displays, analytical results, and model output to summarize critical flood information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Sabhan W, Mulligan M, Blackburn GA (2003) A real-time hydrological model for flood prediction using GIS and the WWW. Comput Environ Urban Syst 27:9–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton I, Bathols J (1989) Monitoring floods with AVHRR. Int J Remote Sensing 10:1873–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Manage Sci 31:647–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson C, Turban E (2002) DSS: directions for the next decade. Decis Support Syst 33:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casale R, Samuels PG (1998) Hydrological risks: analysis of recent results from EC research and technological development actions. Directorate-General Science, Research and Development, Environment and Climate Programme, European Commission

  • Clark MJ (1998) Putting water in its place: a perspective on GIS in hydrology and water management. Hydrol Processes 12:823–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M, Ruggles F, Guss P, Yost E (1973) Mapping the 1973 Mississippi floods from the Earth Resource Technology satellites. In: Proceedings of international symposium on remote sensing and water resource management, (Burlington, American Water Resources Association Ontario)

  • Dingfei L, Stewart TJ (2004) Object-oriented decision support system modelling for multicriteria decision making in natural resource management. Comput Oper Res 31:985–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling DR, Evans JL, Groisman PY, Karl TR, Kunkil KE, Ambenjen P (1999) Observed variability and trends in severe weather climate events: a brief review. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 81:417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom SB (1999) Decision support systems research: current state and trends. Ind Manage Data Syst 5:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AD (1981) HEC Models for Water Resources System Simulation: Theory and Experience. Advances in hydroscience, vol 12. Academic, New York, pp 297–423

  • Frank AU (1993) The use of geographical information system: the user interface is the system. In: Medyckyj-Scott D, Hearnshaw H (eds) Human factors in geographical information systems. Belhaven Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes YY, Hall WA (1974) Multi-objectives in water resources systems analysis: the surrogate worth trade-off method. Water Resources Res 10:615–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipel KW (1992) Multiple objective decision making in water resources. Water Resource Bull 28(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MM, Sadu K (2002) Development of priority map remote sensing data for flood counter measures by Geographic Information System. J Hydrol Eng 7:346–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston S, Carver S, Evans A, Turton I (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environment decision-making. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labadie JW, Sullivan CH (1986) Computerized Decision Support Systems for Water Managers. J Water Resource Plan Manage ASCE 112:299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekuthai A, Vongvisessomjai S (2001) Intangible flood damage quantification. Water Resource Manage 15:343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (1996) Developing and implementing decision support systems: a critique and challenge. Water Resource Bull 31:571–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP, da Costa JR (eds) (1991) Decision support systems: water resources planning, NATO ASI series. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 87–96

  • Miller RC, Guertin DP, Heilman P (2004) Information technology in watershed management decision making. J Am Water Resource Assoc 40:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysiak J, Giupponib C, Rosatoc P (2005) Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management. Environ Model Softw 20:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plate EJ (2002) Flood risk and flood management. J Hydrol 267:2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju KS, Pillai CRS (1999) Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development. Eur J Oper Res 112:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rango A, Anderson AT (1974) Flood hazard studies in the Mississippi River Basin using remote sensing. Water Resource Bull 10:1060–1081

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples, la methode ELECTRE. RIRO 2:57–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hieararchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2000) The fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process, vol VI, AHP Series. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

  • Saaty TL (2001) The analytic network process: decision making with dependence and feedback. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2004) Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal J, Lu X (2004) Application of remote sensing in flood management with special reference to monsoon asia: a review. Nat Hazards 33:283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schielen RMJ, Gijsbers PJA (2003) DSS-large rivers: developing a DSS under changing societal requirements. Phys Chem Earth 28:635–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Ahmad S (2005) Computer-based model for flood evacuation emergency planning. Nat Hazards 34:25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LC (1997) Satellite remote sensing of river inundation area, stage and discharge: a review. Hydrol Processes 11:1427–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soscini-Sessa R, Castelletti A, Weber EA (2003) DSS for planning and managing water reservoir systems. Environ Model Softw 18:395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague R (1983) A framework for the development of decision support systems, decision support systems: a data based, model-oriented, user-developed discipline. Petrocelli, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam A, Kazimierz AS, Aronson JE (1998) An interactive reservoir management system for Lake Kariba. Eur J Oper Res IO7:119–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E (1999) An operational decision support system for flood risk mapping, forecasting and management. Urban Water 1:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E, Marsigli M, Pani G, Vignoli R (1997). Operational UNDRO, 1991. Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator: Mitigating natural disasters: phenomena, effects and options. A Manual for Policy Makers and Planners, United Nations, New York

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (1990) Flood damage analysis package on the microcomputer-installation and user’s guide, TD-31, CEIWR-Hydraulic Engineering Center, Davis

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (1982) HEC-5 simulation of flood control and conservation systems, user’s manual. CPD-5A, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (1985) Reservoir Systems analysis for Conservation HEC-3 User’s Manual. CPD-3A, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (1986) HEC-5(Q) simulation of flood control and conservation systems; appendix, water quality analysis. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (1987) HEC-DSS user’s guide and utility program manual. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA, USA

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (1997) HEC-FDA flood damage reduction analysis, user’s manual, CPD-72. CEIWR-HEC, Davis

  • Vermieren JC, Watson CC (2001) New technology for improved storm risk assessment in the Caribbean. Disaster Manage 6:191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Colby JD, Mulcahy KA (2002) An efficient method for mapping flood extent in a coastal flood plain using Landsat TM and DEM data. Int J Remote Sensing 23:3681–3696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki AP (2000) Decision support methods and applications: the cross-sections of economics and engineering or environmental issues. Annu Rev Control 24:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Willet K, Sharda R (1991) Using the analytic hierarchy process in water resources planning: selection of flood control projects. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 25:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Hu ZZ, Kirtman BP (2003) Evolution of ENSO-related rainfall anomalies in East Asia. J Climate 16:3742–3758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerger A, Wealands S (2004) Beyond modelling: linking models with GIS for flood risk management. Nat Hazards 33:191–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Disaster and Emergency Studies (ADES), Brandon University, Brandon, R7A 6A9, MB, Canada

    Jason K. Levy

Authors
  1. Jason K. Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason K. Levy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, J.K. Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management. Stoch Environ Res Ris Assess 19, 438–447 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0009-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0009-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation