Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic variation in carbon isotope discrimination-based water use efficiency of teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) and its association with growth and wood quality traits

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) is one of the most preferred tropical timber species for afforestation, reforestation, and commercial plantation in the world. In the event of global warming caused by projected climate change, water-use-efficient teak planting stock would become essential for breeding and plantation activities. To characterize and to evaluate the association of water-use efficiency (WUE) with other growth and wood quality traits, we measured height, girth at breast height (GBH), wood density (WD), and carbon isotope discrimination (CID) values of 162 teak plus trees in a national teak germplasm bank (NTGB). The genetic diversity and structure of these accessions were also confirmed through 21 microsatellite markers for confirmation of their representation of teak meta-population in India. Results indicate 30.43% variation in average height (11.17 ± 3.40 m), 25.51% variation in GBH (67.18 ± 17.14 cm), and 7.48% variation in WD (789.24 ± 59.04 kg/m3) among the accessions. The accessions exhibited a significantly high level of genetic polymorphism (88.74%) with a moderate level of Shannon’s diversity index (0.53) and comparatively low heterozygosity (0.27). No significant correlation was found between height and GBH with the CID values. This confirms that the measurement of growth and wood quality traits in teak alone is not helpful to tree breeders for indirect selection of water-use efficient trees. Rather, assessment of more specific traits related to growth, wood quality, and WUE of teak in different locales will be required to improve the teak germplasm in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken SN, Kavanagh KL, Yoder BJ (1995) Genetic variation in seedling water-use efficiency as estimated by carbon isotope ratios and its relationship to sapling growth in Douglas-fir. For Genet 2:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Arun Kumar NA, Srinivasa YB, Chauhan SS (2002) Growth rate convergence in teak (Tectona grandisL.f.). Curr Sci 83:808–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedell PE (2006) Tree breeding for genetic improvement of tropical tree species. Allied Publishers Pvt, Ltd, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington JD, Harris IM, Brook RM (2015) Beyond the project cycle: a medium-term evaluation of agroforestry adoption and diffusion in a south Indian village. AgroforSyst 90(3):489–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugnoli E, Farquhar GD (2000) Photosynthetic fractionation of carbon isotopes. In: Leegood RC, Sharkey TD, von Caemmerer (eds) Photosynthesis: physiology and metabolism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, pp 399– 434

  • Casasoli M, Derory J, Morera-Dutrey C, Brendel O, Porth I, Guehl JM, Villani F, Kremer A (2006) Comparison of quantitative trait loci for adaptive traits between oak and chestnut based on an expressed sequence tag consensus map. Genet 172(1):533–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2008) Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc (B) 363(1491):557–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Condon AG, Farquhar GD, Rebetzke GJ, Richards RA (2006) The application of carbon isotope discrimination in cereal improvement for water-limited environments. In: Ribaut JM (ed) Drought Adaptation in Cereals. Food Products Press, Binghamton, USA, pp 171–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumbie WP, Eckert A, Wegrzyn J, Whetten R, Neale D, Goldfarb B (2011) Association genetics of carbon isotope discrimination, height and foliar nitrogen in a natural population of Pinus taeda L. Heredity 107(2):105–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanapal AP, Ray JD, Singh SK, Hoyos-Villegas V, Smith JR, Purcell LC, King CA, Cregan PB, Song QJ, Fritschi FB (2015) Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of carbon isotope ratio (δC13) in diverse soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 128(1):73–91.

  • Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) ARLEQUIN suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under LINUX and WINDOWS. Mol Ecol Note 10:564–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Note 7:574–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Famula RA, Richards JH, Famula TR, Neale DB (2019) Association genetics of carbon isotope discrimination and leaf morphology in a breeding population of Juglans regia L. Tree Genet Genome 15:6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-018-1307-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2001) Mean annual volume increment of selected industrial forest plantation species by L Ugalde & O Pérez. Forest Plantation Thematic Papers, Working Paper 1. Forest Resources Development Service, Forest Resources Division. FAO, Rome (unpublished)

  • FAO (2015) Global teak trade in the aftermath of Myanmar’s log export ban by Kollert W & Walotek PJ Planted forests and trees working paper FP/49/E. Rome, Italy (available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5023e.pdf)

  • Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:539–552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 40:503–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fofana IJ, Lidah YJ, Diarrassouba N, N’guetta SPA, (2008) Genetic structure and conservation of teak (Tectona grandis) plantations in Cote d’Ivoire, revealed by site specific recombinase (SSR). Trop Conserv Sci 1(3):279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Martínez SC, Wheeler NC, Ersoz E, Nelson CD, Neale DB (2008) Association genetics in Pinus taeda L. II Carbon isotope discrimination. Heredity 101:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan R, Jayaraman M, Swarnim S, Chaturvedi RK, Bala G, Ravindranath NH (2011) Impact of climate change at species level: a case study of teak in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra FP, Richards JH, Fiehn O, Famula R, Stanton BJ, Shuren R, Sykes R, Davis MF, Neale DB (2016) Analysis of the genetic variation in growth, ecophysiology, and chemical and metabolomic composition of wood of Populus trichocarpa provenances. Tree Genet Genom 12(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL (2019) Dold C (2019) Water-use efficiency: advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front Plant Sci 10:103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impa SM, Nadaradjan S, Boominathan P, Shashidhar G, Bindumadhava H, Sheshshayee MS (2005) Carbon isotope discrimination accurately reflects variability in WUE measured at a whole plant level in rice. Crop Sci 45(6):2517–2522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) IPCC Climate Change 2013: an assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change

  • Kedharnath S, Chacko VJ, Gupta SK, Matthews JD (1963) Geographical and individual tree variation in some wood characters of teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) I. Fibre length. Silvae Genet 12 (6): 181–187

  • Keiding H, Wellendorf H, Lauridsen EB (1986) Evaluation of an international series of teak provenance trials. Danida Forest Seed Centre, pp 1–81

  • Khasanah N, Perdana A, Rahmanullah A, Manurung G, Roshetko JM, van Noordwijk M (2015) Intercropping teak (Tectona grandis) and maize (Zea mays): bioeconomic trade-off analysis of agroforestry management practices in Gunungkidul, West Java. Agrofor Syst 89:1019–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjær ED, Kaosa-ard A, Suangtho V (2000) Domestication of teak through tree improvement. Options, possible gains and critical factors. In: Enters T, Nair CT (eds) Site, technology and productivity of teak plantations. FORSPA Publication No. 24/2000, TEAKNET Pub No. 3. pp 161–189

  • Kloeppel B, Gower S, Treichel I et al (1998) Foliar carbon isotope discrimination in Larix species and sympatric evergreen conifers: a global comparison. Oecologia 114:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Kotrange HR, Dhotekar UP (1998) Genetic improvement of teak. Ind For 124(9):687–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcott SA, Shakun JD, Clark PU, Mix AC (2013) A reconstruction of regional and global temperature for the past 11,300 years. Science 339:1198–1201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marguerit E, Bouffier L, Chancerel E, Costa P, Lagane F, Guehl J-M, Plomion C, Brendel O (2014) The genetics of water-use efficiency and its relation to growth in maritime pine. J Exp Bot 65:4757–4768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKay J, Richards J, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Mol Ecol 12(5):1137–1151

  • Miranda I, Almeida MH, Pereira H (2001) Provenance and site variation of wood density in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. at harvest age and its relation to a non-destructive early assessment. For Ecol Manag 149(13):235-240

  • Narayanan C, Dubey S, Wali SA, Shukla N, Kumar R, Mandal AK, Ansari AS (2006) Optimization of DNA extraction for ISSR studies in Tectona grandis L.f. - an important forest tree species. Afr J Biotechnol 5:1220–1223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan C, Chawhaan PH, Mandal AK (2009) Inheritance pattern of growth and wood traits in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Silvae Genet 58(3):97–101

  • Niinements Ü (1999) Research review: Components of leaf dry mass per area thickness and density alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytol 144(1):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande PK (2005) Biomass and productivity in some disturbed tropical dry deciduous teak forests of Satpura plateau, Madhya Pradesh. Trop Ecol 46:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatic 28:2537–2539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasolova NV, Xu ZH, Farquhar GD, Saffigna PG, Dieters MJ (2000) Variation in branchlet delta C-13 in relation to branchlet nitrogen concentration and growth in 8-year-old hoop pine families (Araucaria cunninghamii) in subtropical Australia. Tree Physiol 20(15):1049–1055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genet 155:945–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebetzke G, Condon A, Farquhar G, Appels R, Richards R (2008) Quantitative trait loci for carbon isotope discrimination are repeatable across environments and wheat mapping populations. Theor Appl Genet 118(1):123–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rupa Kumar K, Sahai AK, Krishna Kumar K, Patwardhan SK, Mishra PK, Revadekar JV, Kamala K, Pant GB (2006) High-resolution climate change scenarios for India for the 21st century. Curr Sci 90:334–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari DN (1992) A monograph on teak (Tectona grandisL.f.). International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun, India

  • Tsai HY, Hamilton A, Tinch AE, Guy DR, Gharbi K, Stear MJ, Matika O, Bishop SC, Houston RD (2015) Genome wide association and genomic prediction for growth traits in juvenile farmed Atlantic salmon using a high density SNP array. BMC Genom 16(1):969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadez V, Kholova J, Medina S, Kakkera A, Anderberg H (2014) Transpiration efficiency: new insights into an old story. J Exp Bot 65(21):6141–6153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaishnav V (2018) Study on genetic structure, linkage disequilibrium and marker-wood trait association in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) of National Germplasm Bank Chandrapur using microsatellite markers. Doctoral thesis, Forest Research Institute University, Dehradun, India

  • Vaishnav V, Ansari SA (2018a) Detection of the QTL associated with wood density evaluating genetic structure and linkage disequilibrium of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) germplasm bank. Journal of Forestry Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0751-1

  • Vaishnav V, Ansari SA (2018b) Genetic differentiation and adaptation in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) metapopulations. Plant Mol Biol Rep: doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-018-1101-3

  • Verhaegan D, Ofori D, Fofana IJ, Poitel M, Vaillant A (2005) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Tectona grandis (Linn. f). Mol Ecol 5:945–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TJ (1999) POPGENE, Version 1.3. Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Distributed by the author http://www.ualberta.ca/*fyeh/fyeh/

  • Zickfeld K, Knopf B, Petoukhov V, Schellnhuber HJ (2005) Is the Indian summer monsoon stable against global change? Geophys Res Lett 32:L15707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel B, Talbert J (1984) Applied forest tree improvement. Wiley, Canada

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Directors, CSIR- National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow and Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur for support and encouragement. The authors also would like to thank Director, Maharashtra Van Sanshodhan Sansthan (MVSS), Chandrapur, for permission to access the teak germplasm bank. The fellowship support to Vivek Vaishnav by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi (India) is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VV performed field sampling, carried out laboratory experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the draft of the manuscript. PK supervised the project as project investigator. PAS designed the experiment to measure the CID of teak wood samples using IRMS and reviewed the literature supporting water-use-efficiency in plants. TSR supervised all the work and improved the manuscript for communication. All authors contributed equally to the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tikam S. Rana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data archiving statement

The input data file along with details of the accessions will be submitted as Supplementary Files on acceptance.

Ethical standards

No human/animal was harmed/involved during the study.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Gratani.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaishnav, V., Kumar, P., Shirke, P.A. et al. Genetic variation in carbon isotope discrimination-based water use efficiency of teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) and its association with growth and wood quality traits. Trees 35, 799–807 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02078-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02078-4

Keywords

Navigation