pp 1–9 | Cite as

Night-time transpiration, predawn hydraulic conductance and water potential disequilibrium in hybrid aspen coppice

  • Ott KangurEmail author
  • Arvo Tullus
  • Arne Sellin
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Long Distance Transport: Phloem and Xylem


Key message

Predawn water potential disequilibrium in hybrid aspen coppice growing in humid environment was mostly determined by hydraulic conductance and the ratio of nocturnal to daily water loss was relatively small.


Water relations are of crucial importance for biomass accumulation in trees and forest productivity, yet the significance of nocturnal water use is still debated. We investigated which environmental factors influence nocturnal transpiration, development of the equilibrium between soil and plant water potentials and plant hydraulic conductance in hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) coppice. Predawn leaf water potential and sap flow were measured simultaneously with relevant environmental factors on 2-year-old coppice shoots during the growing season of 2015. Nocturnal water loss constituted on average 4–5% of daily total transpiration and almost 2/3 of nocturnal sap flow. The nocturnal water loss was mainly driven by atmospheric evaporative demand, while maximum sap flux densities could extend 35% of the daytime values on dry nights. Predawn leaf water potential was constantly more negative than soil water potential, resulting in predawn disequlibrium between leaf and soil water potentials (PDD). Total soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance was the primary factor explaining the variation in PDD. Our results suggest that in humid conditions plant hydraulic capacity is more substantial determining plant predawn water status than stomatal behaviour with respect to current environmental drivers.


Atmospheric humidity Hydraulic conductance Nocturnal transpiration Predawn disequilibrium Sap flow Water potential 



This study was supported by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (institutional research project IUT34-9). Special thanks to Dr Priit Kupper for helpful comments and reviewing the manuscript.


  1. Alvarado-Barrientos SM, Holwerda F, Geissert DR, Muños-Villers LE, Gotsch SG, Asbjornsen H, Dawson TE (2015) Nighttime transpiration in a seasonally dry tropical montane cloud forest environment. Trees 29:259–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benyon R (1999) Nighttime water use in an irrigated Eucalyptus grandis plantation. Tree Physiol 19:853–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolton D (1980) The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Mon Weather Rev 108:1046–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodribb TJ (2009) Xylem hydraulic physiology: the functional backbone of terrestrial plant productivity. Plant Sci 177:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2003) Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance during leaf shedding in seasonally dry tropical forest. New Phytol 158:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Hinojosa JA, Hoffmann WA, Franco AC (2004) Processes preventing nocturnal equilibration between leaf and soil water potential in tropical savanna woody species. Tree Physiol 24:1119–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Campanello P, Scholz FG (2005) Mechanisms contributing to seasonal homeostasis of minimum leaf water potential and predawn disequilibrium between soil and plant water potential in Neotropical savanna trees. Trees 19:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Turner NC, Beverly CR, Ong CK, Khan AAH, Bleby TM (2001) An improved heat pulse method to measure low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants. Tree Physiol 21:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caird MA, Richards JH, Donovan LA (2006) Nighttime stomatal conductance and transpiration in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol 143:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaves MM (1991) Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. J Exp Bot 42:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochard H, Bréda N, Granier A (1996) Whole tree hydraulic conductance and water loss regulation in Quercus during drought: evidence for stomatal control of embolism? Ann Sci Forest 53:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daley MJ, Phillips NG (2006) Interspecific variation in nighttime transpiration and stomatal conductance in a mixed New England deciduous forest. Tree Physiol 26:411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawson TE, Burgess SSO, Tu KP, Oliveira RS, Santiago LS, Fisher JB, Simonin KA, Ambrose AR (2007) Nighttime transpiration in woody plants from contrasting ecosystems. Tree Physiol 27:561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donovan LA, Grisé DJ, West JB, Pappert RA, Alder NN, Richards JH (1999) Predawn disequilibrium between plant and soil water potentials in two cold-desert shrubs. Oecologia 120:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donovan LA, Richards JH, Linton MJ (2003) Magnitude and mechanisms of disequilibrium between predawn plant and soil water potentials. Ecology 84:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eller F, Jensen K, Reisdorff C (2017) Nighttime stomatal conductance differs with nutrient availability in two temperate floodplain tree species. Tree Physiol 37:428–440Google Scholar
  17. Fisher JB, Baldocchi DD, Misson L, Dawson TE, Goldstein AH (2007) What the towers don’t see at night: nocturnal sap flow in trees and shrubs at two AmeriFlux sites in California. Tree Physiol 27:597–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forster MA (2014) How significant is nocturnal sap flow? Tree Physiol 34:757–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gansert D (2003) Xylem sap flow as a major pathway for oxygen supply to the sapwood of birch (Betula pubescens Ehr.). Plant, Cell Environ 26:1803–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howard AR, Donovan LA (2010) Soil nitrogen limitation does not impact nighttime water loss in Populus. Tree Physiol 30:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kozlowski TT (1997) Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiol Monogr 1:1–29Google Scholar
  22. Kupper P, Sõber J, Sellin A, Lõhmus K, Tullus A, Räim O, Lubenets K, Tulva I, Uri V, Zobel M, Kull O, Sõber A (2011) An experimental facility for free air humidity manipulation (FAHM) can alter water flux through deciduous tree canopy. Environ Exp Bot 72:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kupper P, Rohula G, Saksing L, Sellin A, Lõhmus K, Ostonen I, Helmisaari HS, Sõber A (2012) Does soil nutrient availability influence night-time water flux of aspen saplings? Environ Exp Bot 82:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lombardozzi DL, Zeppel MJB, Fisher RA, Tawfik A (2017) Representing nighttime and minimum conductance in CLM4.5: global hydrology and carbon sensitivity analysis using observational constraints. Geosci Model Dev 10:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meitern A, Õunapuu-Pikas E, Sellin A (2017) Circadian patterns of xylem sap properties and their covariation with plant hydraulic traits in hybrid aspen. J Plant Physiol 213:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nardini A, Salleo S, Andri S (2005) Circadian regulation of leaf hydraulic conductance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv Margot). Plant, Cell Environ 28:750–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nardini A, Savi T, Losso A, Petit G, Pacilè S (2017) X-ray microtomography observations of xylem embolism in stems of Laurus nobilis are consistent with hydraulic measurements of percentage loss of conductance. New Phytol 213:1068–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Õunapuu E, Sellin A (2013) Daily dynamics of leaf and soil-to-branch hydraulic conductance in silver birch (Betula pendula) measured in situ. Plant Physiol Biochem 68:104–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ourcival J-M, Berger A (1995) Equilibrium between soil water potential and predawn water potential of two pre-saharan shrub species of Tunisia. J Arid Environ 30:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pivovaroff AL, Sack L, Santiago LS (2014) Coordination of stem and leaf hydraulic conductance in southern California shrubs: a test of the hydraulic segmentation hypothesis. New Phytol 203:842–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Resco de Dios V, Diaz-Sierra R, Goulden ML, Barton CVM, Boer MM, Gessler A, Ferrio JP, Pfautsch S, Tissue DT (2013) Woody clockworks: circadian regulation of night-time water use in Eucalyptus globulus. New Phytol 200:743–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Resco de Dios V, Loik ME, Smith R, Aspinwall MJ, Tissue DT (2016) Genetic variation in circadian regulation of nocturnal stomatal conductance enhances carbon assimilation and growth. Plant, Cell Environ 39:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogiers SY, Greer DH, Hatfield JM, Hutton RJ, Clarke SJ, Hutchinson PA, Somers A (2012) Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid. Tree Physiol 32:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryan MG, Phillips N, Bond BJ (2006) The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. Plant, Cell Environ 29:367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sack L, Holbrook NM (2006) Leaf hydraulics. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sack L, Ball MC, Brodersen C, Davis SD, Des Marais DL, Donovan LA, Givnish TJ, Hacke UG, Huxman T, Jansen S, Jacobsen AL, Johnson DM, Koch GW, Maurel C, Mcculloh KA, Mcdowell NG, Mcelrone A, Pellegrini M, Pockman WT, Pratt RB, Sala A, Santiago LS, Savage JA, Scoffoni C, Sevanto S, Sperry J, Tyerman SD, Way D, Holbrook NM (2016) Plant hydraulics as a central hub integrating plant and ecosystem function: meeting report for Emerging Frontiers in Plant Hydraulics (Washington, DC, May 2015). Plant, Cell Environ 39:2087–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Franco AC, Miralles-Wilhelm F (2007) Removal of nutrient limitations by long-term fertilization decreases nocturnal water loss in savanna trees. Tree Physiol 27:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sellin A (1999) Does pre-dawn water potential reflect conditions of equilibrium in plant and soil water status? Acta Oecol 20:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sellin A (2001) Hydraulic and stomatal adjustment of Norway spruce trees to environmental stress. Tree Physiol 21:879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sellin A, Lubenets K (2010) Variation of transpiration within a canopy of silver birch: effect of canopy position and daily versus nightly water loss. Ecohydrology 3:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sellin A, Õunapuu E, Kupper P (2008) Effects of light intensity and duration on leaf hydraulic conductance and distribution of resistance in shoots of silver birch (Betula pendula). Physiol Plant 134:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sellin A, Alber M, Keinänen M, Kupper P, Lihavainen J, Lõhmus K, Oksanen E, Sõber A, Sõber J, Tullus A (2017a) Growth of northern deciduous trees under increasing atmospheric humidity: possible mechanisms behind the growth retardation. Reg Environ Change 17:2135–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sellin A, Alber M, Kupper P (2017b) Increasing air humidity influences hydraulic efficiency but not functional vulnerability of xylem in hybrid aspen. J Plant Physiol 219:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tullus A, Kupper P, Sellin A, Parts L, Sõber J, Tullus T, Lõhmus K, Sõber A, Tullus H (2012a) Climate change at Northern latitudes: rising atmospheric humidity decreases transpiration, N-uptake and growth rate of hybrid aspen. PLoS One 7:e42648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tullus A, Rytter L, Tullus T, Weih M, Tullus H (2012b) Short-rotation forestry with hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) in Northern Europe. Scand J Forest Res 27:10–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang S-J, Zhang Y-J, Sun M, Goldstein G, Cao K-F (2012) Recovery of diurnal depression of leaf hydraulic conductance in a subtropical woody bamboo species: embolism refilling by nocturnal root pressure. Tree Physiol 32:414–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yu T, Feng Q, Si J, Mitchell PJ, Forster MA, Zhang X, Zhao C (2018) Depressed hydraulic redistripution of roots more by stem refilling than by nocturnal transpiration for Populus euphratica Oliv. in situ measurement. Ecol Evol 8:2607–2616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zeppel MJB, Tissue D, Taylor D, MacInnis-Ng C, Eamus D (2010) Rates of nocturnal transpiration in two evergreen temperate woodland species with differing water-use strategies. Tree Physiol 30:988–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ecology and Earth SciencesUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations