Abstract
Key message
Leaf area is proportional to the product of leaf length and width both for herbaceous and woody plants. The coefficient of proportionality falls into the range (1/2, π/4) for the investigated species.
Abstract
According to Thompson’s principle of similarity, the area of an object should be proportional to its length squared. However, leaf area–length data of some plants have been demonstrated not to follow the principle of similarity. We explore the reasons why the leaf area–length allometry deviates from the principle of similarity and examine whether there is a general model describing the relationship among leaf area, width and length. We sampled more than 11,800 leaves from six classes of woody and herbaceous plants and tested the leaf area–length allometry. We compared six mathematical models based on root-mean-square error as the measure of goodness-of-fit. The best supported model described a proportional relationship between leaf area and the product of leaf width and length (i.e., the Montgomery model). We found that the extent to which the leaf area–length allometry deviates from the principle of similarity depends upon the extent of variation of the ratio of leaf width to length. Estimates of the parameter of the Montgomery model ranged between 1/2, which corresponds to a triangular leaf with leaf length as its height and leaf width as its base, and π/4, which corresponds to an elliptical leaf with leaf length as its major axis and leaf width as its minor axis, for the six classes of plants. The narrow range in practice of the Montgomery parameter implies an evolutionary stability for the leaf area of large-leaved plants despite the fact that leaf shapes of these plants are rather different.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Coen E, Rolland-Lagan A-G, Mathews M, Bangham JA, Prusinkiewicz P (2004) The genetics of geometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4728–4735. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306308101
de Swart EAM, Groenwold R, Kanne HJ, Stam P, Marcelis LFM, Voorrips RE (2004) Non-destructive estimation of leaf area for different plant ages and accessions of Capsicum annuum L. J Hortic Sci Biotech 79:764–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2004.11511840
Dornbusch T, Watt J, Baccar R, Fournier C, Andrieu B (2011) A comparative analysis of leaf shape of wheat, barley and maize using an empirical shape model. Ann Bot 107:865–873. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq181
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York
Fang YM (1994) Geographical distribution and spatial pattern of Liriodendron chinense (Hemsl.) Sarg. J Nanjing For Univ 18(2):13–18 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
Gielis J (2003) A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shapes. Am J Bot 90:333–338. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.3.333
Griffith DM, Quigley KM, Anderson TM (2016) Leaf thickness controls variation in leaf mass per area (LMA) among grazing-adapted grasses in Serengeti. Physiol Ecol 181:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3632-3
Jani TC, Misra DK (1966) Leaf area estimation by linear measurements in Ricinus communis. Nature 212:741–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/212741b0
Kumar V, DiTommaso A (2005) Mile-a-minute (Polygonum perfoliatum): an increasingly problematic invasive species. Weed Technol 19:1071–1077. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-177R.1
Li G, Yang D, Sun S (2008) Allometric relationships between lamina area, lamina mass and petiole mass of 93 temperate woody species vary with leaf habit, leaf form and altitude. Funct Ecol 22:557–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01407.x
Lin S, Zhang L, Reddy GVP, Hui C, Gielis J, Ding Y, Shi P (2016) A geometrical model for testing bilateral symmetry of bamboo leaf with a simplified Gielis equation. Ecol Evol 6:6798–6806. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2407
Lin S, Shao L, Hui C, Song Y, Reddy GVP, Gielis J, Li F, Ding Y, Wei Q, Shi P (2018) Why does not the leaf weight-area allometry of bamboos follow the 3/2-power law? Front Plant Sci 9:583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00583
Milla R, Reich PB (2007) The scaling of leaf area and mass: the cost of light interception increases with leaf size. Proc R Soc B 274:2109–2114. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0417
Montgomery EG (1911) Correlation studies in corn. In: Annual Report no. 24. Agricultural Experimental Station, Lincoln, NB, pp 108–159
O’Shea B, Mordue-Luntz AJ, Fryer RJ, Pert CC, Bricknell IR (2006) Determination of the surface area of a fish. J Fish Dis 29:437–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2761.2006.00728.x
Palaniswamy KM, Gomez KA (1974) Length-width method for estimating leaf area of rice. Agron J 66:430–433. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030027x
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Runions A, Tsiantis M, Prusinkiewicz P (2017) A common developmental program can produce diverse leaf shapes. New Phytol 216:401–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14449
Sandhu HS, Shi PJ, Kuang XJ, Xue FS, Ge F (2011) Applications of the bootstrap to insect physiology. Fla Entomol 94:1036–1041. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0442
Shi PJ, Liu MD (2019) Taylor’s power law of the leaf bilateral symmetry measure of Liriodendron trees. J Nanjing For Univ 43, in press. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201808022 (in Chinese with English Abstract)
Shi PJ, Huang JG, Hui C, Grissino-Mayer HD, Tardif J, Zhai LH, Wang FS, Li BL (2015a) Capturing spiral radial growth of conifers using the superellipse to model tree-ring geometric shape. Front Plant Sci 6:856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00856
Shi PJ, Xu Q, Sandhu HS, Gielis J, Ding YL, Li HR, Dong XB (2015b) Comparison of dwarf bamboos (Indocalamus sp.) leaf parameters to determine relationship between spatial density of plants and total leaf area per plant. Ecol Evol 5:4578–4589. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1728
Shi PJ, Ratkowsky DA, Wang NT, Li Y, Reddy GVP, Zhao L, Li B-L (2017) Comparison of five methods for parameter estimation under Taylor’s power law. Ecol Complex 32:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2017.10.006
Shi PJ, Ratkowsky DA, Li Y, Zhang LF, Lin SY, Gielis J (2018a) General leaf-area geometric formula exists for plants—evidence from the simplified Gielis equation. Forests 9:714. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9110714
Shi PJ, Zheng X, Ratkowsky DA, Li Y, Wang P, Cheng L (2018b) A simple method for measuring the bilateral symmetry of leaves. Symmetry 10:118. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10040118
Shi PJ, Liu MD, Yu XJ, Gielis J, Ratkowsky DA (2019) Proportional relationship between leaf area and the product of leaf length width of four types of special leaf shapes. Forests 10:178. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020178
Sicard A, Thamm A, Marona C, Lee YW, Wahl V et al (2014) Repeated evolutionary changes of leaf morphology caused by mutations to a homeobox gene. Curr Biol 24:1880–1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.061
Sun J, Fan R, Niklas KJ, Zhong Q, Yang F, Li M, Chen X, Sun M, Cheng D (2017) “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass in Wuyi Mountain bamboos, Southeast China. Am J Bot 104:993–998. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1700068
Thompson DW (1917) On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, London
Verwijst T, Wen DZ (1996) Leaf allometry of Salix viminalis during the first growing season. Tree Physiol 16:655–660
Vlad D, Kierzkowki D, Rast MI, Vuolo F, Dello Ioio R, Galinha C et al (2014) Leaf shape evolution through duplication, regulatory diversification, and loss of a homeobox gene. Science 343:780–783. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248384
Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199:213–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004327224729
Witkowski ETF, Lamont BB (1991) Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness. Oecologia 88:86–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317710
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403
Yano S, Terashima I (2004) Developmental process of sun and shade leaves in Chenopodium album L. Plant Cell Environ 27:781–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01182.x
Zhang L, Yang J, Huang Y, Jia Z, Fang Y (2018) Leaf venation variation and phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental heterogeneity in Parrotia subaequalis (H. T. Chang) R. M. Hao et H. T. Wei, an endemic and endangered tree species from China. Forests 9:247. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050247
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Robert D. Guy, the Communicating Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments on the earlier version of this manuscript. We thank Liang Cheng, Yanming Fang, Shuyan Lin and Xiao Zheng for their help during the leaf collection. This work was nominally financially supported the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, P., Liu, M., Ratkowsky, D.A. et al. Leaf area–length allometry and its implications in leaf shape evolution. Trees 33, 1073–1085 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01843-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01843-4
Keywords
- Allometry
- Montgomery model
- Leaf area
- Leaf dimension
- Thompson’s principle of similarity