Genome-wide identification and characterization of growth-regulating factors in mulberry (Morus spp.)
- 98 Downloads
Mulberry GRFs (MnGRFs) were identified from draft genome sequence of Morus notabilis by genome-wide analysis. The expression analysis of MnGRFs was studied in a contrasting set of genotypes for growth.
Growth-regulating factors (GRFs) are multigene family of plants which encode putative transcription factors and play vital role in regulating growth and development. GRF genes of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, Chinese cabbage, etc., have been well characterized but, in mulberry they have not been so far explored. Mulberry growth is the key determinant in leaf yield and is the only source of nutrition for silk-producing insect—Bombyx mori L. In this study, we report ten mulberry-specific GRFs (MnGRFs) identified from the draft genome sequence of Morus notabilis by genome-wide analysis. The MnGRFs contained GRF-specific domains, i.e., QLQ (Glu, Leu, Glu) and WRC (Trp, Arg, Cys) in their N-terminal and Pro, Gln, His, Ala/Gly, Ser/Thr, acidic amino acid residues in C-terminal region. The phylogenetic and motif structure analysis showed that MnGRFs have higher similarity to Arabidopsis and Chinese cabbage (dicots) than rice (monocot). Expression analysis of MnGRFs was undertaken in young leaves of ten contrasting genotypes for growth and observed a significant difference in the transcript levels of MnGRF 1, MnGRF 7 and MnGRF 8 with higher expression in high growth than the low growth genotypes. It is inferred that MnGRFs have an important role in growth and development of immature and young leaves of mulberry contributing to the leaf yield. Furthermore, the study provides a basis for investigation into the function of MnGRF proteins in leaf development and molecular basis for crop improvement.
KeywordsMulberry Growth-regulating factor Genome-wide analysis qPCR
We would like to thank Dr. K. M. Ponnuvel, Scientist-D and Head, SeriBiotech Research Laboratory (SBRL), Bengaluru, for providing an opportunity to utilize the lab facilities for qPCR along with valuable suggestions. Further, the authors thank Ms. Tania Gupta, JRF, for assistance in the qPCR assay.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ercisli S (2004) A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet Resour Crop Evol 51:419–435. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRES.0000023458.60138.79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hewezi T, Maier TR, Nettleton D, Baum TJ (2012) The Arabidopsis microRNA396-GRF1/GRF3 regulatory module acts as a developmental regulator in the reprogramming of root cells during cyst nematode infection. Plant Physiol 159(1):321–335. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.193649 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim JS, Mizoi J, Kidokoro S, Maruyama K et al (2012) Arabidopsis GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR7 functions as a transcriptional repressor of abscisic acid- and osmotic stress-responsive genes, including DREB2A. Plant Cell 24(8):3393–3405. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.100933 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ramanjulu S, Veeranjaneyulu K, Sudhakar C (1994) Sprouting and rooting of mulberry, Morus Alba L. Var. Mysore local cuttings under NaCL salinity. Indian J Sericult 33(1):86–88Google Scholar
- Rukmangada MS, Ramasamy S, Sivaprasad V, Varkody GN (2018) Growth performance in contrasting sets of mulberry (Morus Spp.) genotypes explained by logistic and linear regression models using morphological and gas exchange parameters. Sci Hortic 235:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez MD (2002) Mulberry: an exceptional forage available almost worldwide. In: Sanchez MD (ed) Mulberry for animal production. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of United Nations, pp 271–289Google Scholar
- Thangavelu K, Mukherjee P, Tikader A et al (1997) Catalogue on mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm, vol 1. Silkworm and Mulberry Germplasm Station, HosurGoogle Scholar
- Thangavelu K, Tikader A, Ramesh SR et al (2000) Catalogue on mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm, vol 2. Silkworm and Mulberry Germplasm Station, HosurGoogle Scholar
- Tikader A, Kamble CK (2008) Mulberry wild species in India and their use in crop improvement—a review. Aust J Crop Sci 2(2):64–72Google Scholar
- Tikader A, Chandrasekhar M, Borpuzari MM et al (2006) Catalogue on mulberry (Morus Spp.) germplasm, vols 3 and 4. CSGRC, HosurGoogle Scholar