Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 871–879 | Cite as

Solar radiation strongly influences the quantity of forest tree root exudates

  • Masataka NakayamaEmail author
  • Ryunosuke Tateno
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

The quantity of root exudate carbon produced by Quercus crispula Blume was strongly influenced by the amount of solar radiation 1 day before collection.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate seasonality in the quantity of root exudate produced, and the factors affecting exudate quantity, in mature Quercus crispula Blume trees throughout the growing season. We also aimed to understand the timespan of exudation, from production of photosynthate to release as exudate. We measured the amount of root exudate C produced by Q. crispula, as well as environmental factors including solar radiation and soil and air temperature throughout the growing season. The model best explaining the amount of exudate C, based on the lowest Akaike’s information criterion, was selected to determine the environmental factors that affect exudation. The quantity of exudates did not show clear seasonality, and instead varied widely among sampling dates. A regression model with daily solar radiation for 1 day before sample collection as the sole factor affecting the quantity of exudates was selected as the best model. Solar radiation, which fluctuated greatly among days, more strongly affected the quantity of exudates produced than factors that fluctuated seasonally, such as average temperature. Furthermore, most root exudates from Q. crispula are released within 1 day of being generated by photosynthesis, rather than over several days.

Keywords

Belowground C allocation Fine root Northern hardwood forest Quercus crispula Rhizodeposition Solar radiation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Chikae Iwaoka and Makoto Yasumatsu for supporting chemical analysis, Karibu Fukuzawa and the member of Forest Information Laboratory for their helpful suggestions. We also thank the staffs of Hokkaido forest research station, Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University for helping with the experiments and for providing meteorological data. This study was supported by JSPS-KAKENHI (Nos. 26292085,16H04937and 17H03833).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

468_2018_1685_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 KB)
468_2018_1685_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 15 KB)

References

  1. Badri DV, Vivanco JM (2009) Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ 32:666–681.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01926.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baetz U, Martinoia E (2014) Root exudates: the hidden part of plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 19:90–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.11.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM (2006) The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:233–266.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baudoin E, Benizri E, Guckert A (2003) Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1183–1192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00179-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekkara F, Jay M, Viricel MR, Rome S (1998) Distribution of phenolic compounds within seed and seedlings of two Vicia faba cvs differing in their seed tannin content, and study of their seed and root phenolic exudations. Plant Soil 203:27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004365913726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertin C, Yang XH, Weston L (2003) The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026290508166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coskun D, Britto DT, Shi W, Kronzucker HJ (2017) How plant root exudates shape the nitrogen cycle. Trends Plant Sci 22:661–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekblad A, Nordgren A (2002) Is growth of soil microorganisms in boreal forests limited by carbon or nitrogen availability? Plant Soil 242:115–122.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019698108838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epron D, Ngao J, Mannoura M, Bakker MR, Zeller B, Bazot S, Bosc A, Plain C, Lata JC, Priault P, Barthes L, Loustau D (2011) Seasonal variations of belowground carbon transfer assessed by in situ 13CO2 pulse labelling of trees. Biogeosci Discuss 8:885–919.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1153-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epron D, Bahn M, Derrien D, Lattanzi FA, Pumpanen J, Gessler A, Högberg P, Maillard P, Dannoura M, Gérant D, Buchmann N (2012) Pulse-labelling trees to study carbon allocation dynamics: a review of methods, current knowledge and future prospects. Tree Physiol 32:776–798.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps057 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fahey TJ, Siccama TG, Driscoll CT, Likens GE, Campbell J, Johnson CE, Aber JD, Cole JJ, Fisk MC, Groffman PM, Hamburg SP, Holmes RT, Schwarz PA, Yanai RD (2005) The biogeochemistry of carbon at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 75:109–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-6321-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3794e.pdf. Accessed Oct 2017
  13. Finzi AC, Abramoff RZ, Spiller KS, Brzostek ER, Darby BA, Kramer MA, Phillips RP (2015) Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Glob Chang Biol 21:2082–2094.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12816 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer H, Ingwersen J, Kuzyakov Y (2010) Microbial uptake of low-molecular-weight organic substances out-competes sorption in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 61:504–513.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01244.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haichar FEZ, Santaella C, Heulin T, Achouak W (2014) Root exudates mediated interactions belowground. Soil Biol Biochem 77:69–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hosokawa N, Isobe K, Urakawa R, Tateno R, Fukuzawa K, Watanabe T, Shibata H (2017) Soil freeze-thaw with root litter alters N transformations during the dormant season in soils under two temperate forests in northern Japan. Soil Biol Biochem 114:270–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaiser C, Fuchslueger L, Koranda M, Gorfer M, Stange CF, Kitzler B, Rasche F, Strauss J, Sessitsch A, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Richter A (2011) Plants control the seasonal dynamics of microbial N cycling in a beech forest soil by belowground C allocation. Ecology 92:1036–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1011.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Karst J, Gaster J. Wiley E, Landhäusser SM (2017) Stress differentially causes roots of tree seedlings to exude carbon. Tree physiol 37:154–164.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw090 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuzyakov Y, Cheng W (2001) Photosynthesis controls of rhizosphere respiration and organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1915–1925.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00117-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 129:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDougall BM, Rovira AD (1965) Carbon-14 labelled photosynthate in wheat root exudates. Nature 207:1104–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1038/2071104a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore JC, McKann K, Setälä H, de Ruiter PC (2003) Top–down is bottom–up: does predation in the rhizosphere regulate aboveground dynamics? Ecology 84:846–857. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0846:TIBDPI]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore-Kucera J, Dick RP (2008) PLFA profiling of microbial community structure and seasonal shifts in soils of a Douglas-fir chronosequence. Microb Ecol 55:500–511.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9295-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moran-Zuloaga D, Dippold M, Glaser B, Kuzyakov Y (2015) Organic nitrogen uptake by plants: reevaluation by position-specific labeling of amino acids. Biogeochemistry 125:359–374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0130-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neumann G, Römheld V (2000) The release of root exudates as affected by the plant’s physiological status. In: Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P (eds) The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, pp 41–93Google Scholar
  26. Phillips RP, Erlitz Y, Bier R, Bernhardt ES (2008) New approach for capturing soluble root exudates in forest soils. Funct Ecol 22:990–999.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01495.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Phillips RP, Bernhardt ES, Schlesinger WH (2009) Elevated CO increases root exudation from loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) seedlings as an N-mediated response. Tree Physiol 29:1513–1523.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp083 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips RP, Finzi A, Bernhardt E (2011) Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long-term CO2 fumigation. Ecol Lett 14:187–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pramanik MHR, Nagal M, Asao M, Matsui Y (2000) Effect of temperature amd photoperiod on phytotoxic root exudates of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in hydroponic culture. J Chem Ecol 26:1953–1967.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005509110317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Preece C. Farré-Armengol G, Llusià J, Peñuelas J (2018) Thirsty tree roots exude more carbon. Tree Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx163 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  32. Rovira AD (1969) Plant root exudates. Bot Rev 35:35–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanaullah M, Chabbi A, Rumpel C, Kuzyakov Y (2012) Carbon allocation in grassland communities under drought stress followed by 14C pulse labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 55:132–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheidemann P, Wetzel A (1997) Identification and characterization of flavonoids in the root exudate of Robinia pseudoacacia. Trees 11:316–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009677 Google Scholar
  35. Schimel JP, Weintraub MN (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00015-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smalla K, Wieland G, Buchner A, Zock A, Parzy J, Kaiser S, Roskot N, Heuer H, Berg G (2001) Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed. Appl Environ Microb 67:4742–4751.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.10.4742-4751.2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith WH (1972) Influence of artificial defoliation on exudates of sugar maple. Soil Biol Biochem 4:111–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(72)90050-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith WH (1976) Character and significance of forest tree root exudates. Ecology 57:324–331.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1934820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun L, Kominami Y, Yoshimura K, Kitayama K (2017) Root-exudate flux variations among four co-existing canopy species in a temperate forest, Japan. Ecol Res 32:331–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1440-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Takeuchi M (1981) Studies on the freezing and thawing of the volcanic ash soils in eastern Hokkaido (II): soil freezing and thawing in a grassland (Sasa nipponica) and a brush cutting area. Bull Kyoto Univ Forests 53:205–215 (Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  41. Thornton B, Paterson E, Midwood AJ, Sim A, Pratt SM (2004) Contribution of current carbon assimilation in supplying root exudates of Lolium perenne measured using steady-state 13C labelling. Physiol Plant 120:434–441 doi.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.00250.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tückmantel T, Leuschner C, Preusser S, Kandeler E, Angst G, Mueller CW, Meier IC (2017) Root exudation patterns in a beech forest: dependence on soil depth, root morphology, and environment. Soil Biol Biochem 107:188–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uren NC (2000) Types, amounts, and possible functions of compounds released into the rhizosphere by soil-grown plants. In: Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P (eds) The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, pp 19–40Google Scholar
  44. Vuković R, Bauer N, Curković-Perica M (2013) Genetic elicitation by inducible expression of β-cryptogein stimulates secretion of phenolics from Coleus blumei hairy roots. Plant Sci 199–200:18–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.10.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Watt M, Evans JR (1999) Linking development and determinacy with organic acid efflux from proteoid roots of Lupinus albus L. grown with low phosphorus and ambient or elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Plant Physiol 120:705–716.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.120.3.705 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Yuan HZ, Zhu ZK, Liu SL, Ge TD, Jing HZ, Li BZ, Liu Q, Lynn TM, Wu JS, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Microbial utilization of rice root exudates: 13C labeling and PLFA composition. Biol Fertil Soils 52:615–627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1101-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Filed Science Education and Research CenterKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations