Trees

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 549–557 | Cite as

Down to the wire: late season changes in sex expression in a sexually labile tree species, Acer pensylvanicum (Sapindaceae)

Original Article

Abstract

Key message

In sexually plastic Acer pensylvanicum, determination of sex can occur extremely late, within three weeks of spring flowering. Physical damage causing complete vascular tissue severance results in increased female expression.

Abstract

Species with environmental sex determination are rare amongst angiosperms but widely distributed across taxa. The timing of floral development in species that change sex based on environmental cues is unexplored. We investigated the timing of differentiation of sexual organs in buds of Acer pensylvanicum, an understory tree in eastern North America with environmental sex determination. We collected branches from individuals at three collection times in the early spring of 2016 and kept them in a warm greenhouse until anthesis. All individuals exhibited complete or partial female inflorescences in the greenhouse in one or more collection. However, none of these same individuals produced only female flowers in the field. Unlike many other woody species that differentiate bud sexual primordia 9–12 months prior to flowering, A. pensylvanicum may differentiate the sexual organs in its flower buds as late as three weeks prior to anthesis. In a separate series of branch collections in 2017, we found that the stress response to cutting leads to increased female sex expression in branches, while earlier warm temperatures (e.g., those caused by growing in a protected greenhouse environment) or increased carbohydrate availability does not. Given the labile sex determination system of A. pensylvanicum, the ability to delay differentiation of buds into male or female until shortly before spring flowering would allow individual trees to respond to sex-determining damage cues as late as mid-spring. This supports the hypothesis that A. pensylvanicum may not exhibit the lag-time characteristic of temperate spring and early-summer flowering woody species and may change sex expression in response to stress.

Keywords

Acer Dioecy Environmental sex determination Flowering Phenology Sex expression 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Jason Grabosky, Dr. Peter Morin, Dr. Greg Anderson, the Research and Horticultural greenhouse staff, Carlos Olivares, Anny Marchioni, and Pepe Bowman for help with this research. Research permits were obtained from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. This work was supported by the Ecology and Evolution Graduate Program, Rutgers University; the Torrey Botanical Society; the Botanical Society of America, and NSF IGERT Grant (NSF-DGE/IGERT 0903675).

Author contributions

J. Blake-Mahmud designed and conducted the experiments, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript as part of a doctoral dissertation. L. Struwe co-led the embedding and sectioning investigation and serves as the doctoral dissertation advisor.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

468_2018_1655_MOESM1_ESM.docx (141 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 141.17 kb)

References

  1. Bachtrog D, Mank JE, Peichel CL et al (2014) Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it? PLoS Biol 12:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernier G (1988) The control of floral evocation and morphogenesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39:175–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake J, Struwe L (2015) Temporal and environmental dimensions of variable sex expression in striped maple, Acer pensylvanicum (Sapindaceae). In: Botany. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. http://2015.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=1844. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  4. Blake J, Struwe L (2017) Sugars, stress, and sex-change: environmental sex determination in striped maple. In: Botany. Fort Worth, TX. http://2017.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=235. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  5. Blake-Mahmud J, Struwe L (2016) Late season changes in sex expression in striped maple,Acer pensylvanicum (Sapindaceae). In: Botany. Savannah, GA. http://2016.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=852. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  6. Buban T, Faust M (1982) Flower bud induction in apple trees: Internal control and differentiation. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural reviews. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 174–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A et al (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:357–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnov EL, Bull J (1977) When is sex environmentally determined? Nature 266:495–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnov EL, Bull JJ (1989) The primary sex ratio under environmental sex determination. J Theor Biol 139:431–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis MB (1986) Climatic instability, time lags, and community disequilibrium. In: Diamond JCTJ (ed) Community ecology. Harper and Row Publishers, New York, pp 269–284Google Scholar
  11. de Jong PC (1976) Flowering and sex expression in Acer L.: a biosystematic study. Dissertation, Agricultural University Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabbri A, Benelli C (2000) Flower bud induction and differentiation in olive. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 75:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman DC, Harper KT, Charnov EL (1980) Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia 232:222–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guimond CM, Andrews PK, Lang GA (1998) Scanning electron microscopy of floral initiation in sweet cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:509–512Google Scholar
  15. Haas TP (1933) Untersuchung an der Gattung Acer. Dissertation, Universität München, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Heslop-Harrison J (1957) The experimental modification of sex expression in flowering plants. Biol Rev 32:38–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hibbs DE, Fischer BC (1979) Sexual and vegetative reproduction of striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum L.). Bull Torrey Bot Club 106:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hibbs DE, Wilson BF, Fischer BC (1980) Habitat requirements and growth of striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum L.). Ecology 61:490–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogg EH (1997) Temporal scaling of moisture and the forest-grassland boundary in western Canada. Agric For Meteorol 84:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmes RT, Likens GE (2016) Hubbard Brook: the story of a forest ecosystem. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Hormaza JI, Polito VS (1996) Pistillate and staminate flower development in dioecious Pistacia vera (Anacardiaceae). Am J Bot 83:759–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Immelman KL (1984) Simaroubaceae flowering in Kirkia wilmsii Engl. Bothalia 102:151–152Google Scholar
  23. Korpelainen H (1998) Labile sex expression in plants. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 73:157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG (1991) The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Lavender DP (1986) Angiospermous forest trees of temperate zones. In: Halevy AH (ed) Handbook of Flowering. CRC Press, Inc, Boca Raton, pp 15–23Google Scholar
  26. Lloyd DG (1980) Sexual strategies in plants. I. An hypothesis of serial adjustement of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytol 86:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Longman KA, Coutts MP (1974) Physiology of the oak tree. In: Morris MG, Perring FH (eds) The British oak. The Botanical Society of the British Isles, Berkshire, pp 194–221Google Scholar
  28. McCrum-Gardner E (2008) Which is the correct statistical test to use? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:38–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McNemar Q (1947) Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12:153–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohan JE, Cox RM, Iverson LR (2009) Composition and carbon dynamics of forests in northeastern North America in a future, warmer world. Can J For Res 39:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nanami S, Kawaguchi H, Yamakura T (2004) Sex change towards female in dying Acer rufinerve trees. Ann Bot 93:733–740CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Primack RB, Laube J, Gallinat AS, Menzel A (2015) From observations to experiments in phenology research: investigating climate change impacts on trees and shrubs using dormant twigs. Ann Bot 116:889–897CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Renner SS, Beenken L, Grimm GW, Kocyan A, Ricklefs RE (2007) The evolution of dioecy, heterodichogamy, and labile sex expression in Acer. Evolution 61:2701–2719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlessman MA (1986) Interpretation of evidence for gender choice in plants. Am Nat 128:416–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sedgley M (1989) Floral development, anthesis, and pollination. Acta Hortic 177–184Google Scholar
  36. Sedgley M, Griffin AR (1989) Sexual reproduction of tree crops. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  37. Sinclair JP, Emlen J, Freeman D (2012) Biased sex ratios in plants: theory and trends. Bot Rev 78:63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sullivan JR (1983) Comparative reproductive biology of Acer pensylvanicum and A. Spicatum (Aceraceae). Am J Bot 70:916–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Svenning JC, Sandel B (2013) Disequilibrium vegetation dynamics under future climate change. Am J Bot 100:1266–1286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Vitasse Y, Basler D, Way D (2014) Is the use of cuttings a good proxy to explore phenological responses of temperate forests in warming and photoperiod experiments? Tree Physiol 34:174–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wetzstein H (1989) Pollination and the development of the receptive stigma and Pecan, Carya illinoensis. Acta Hortic 240:193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wetzstein HY, Sparks D (1986) Flowering in Pecan. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural reviews, vol 8. Wiley, NJ, pp 217–255Google Scholar
  43. Wilkie JD, Sedgley M, Olesen T (2008) Regulation of floral initiation in horticultural trees. J Exp Bot 59:3215–3228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Woodroof JG, Chapman-Woodroof N (1926) Fruit-bud differentiation and subsequent development of the flowers in the Hicoria Pecan. J Agric Res 33:677–685Google Scholar
  45. Yates F (1934) Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Suppl J R Stat Soc 1:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yonemori K, Sugiura A, Tanaka K, Kameda K (1993) Floral ontogeny and sex determination in monoecious-type persimmons. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 118:293–297Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Program in Ecology and EvolutionRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural ResourcesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plant BiologyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations