Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 1423–1437 | Cite as

Minimum wood density of conifers portrays changes in early season precipitation at dry and cold Eurasian regions

  • J. Julio CamareroEmail author
  • Laura Fernández-Pérez
  • Alexander V. Kirdyanov
  • Tatiana A. Shestakova
  • Anastasia A. Knorre
  • Vladimir V. Kukarskih
  • Jordi Voltas
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Drought Stress

Abstract

Key message

Minimum wood density exhibits strong responses to precipitation and, thus, it is a robust proxy of early season water availability.

Abstract

Tracheids fulfil most wood functions in conifers (mechanical support and water transport) and earlywood tracheids account for most hydraulic conductivity within the annual tree ring. Dry conditions during the early growing season, when earlywood is formed, could lead to the formation of narrow tracheid lumens and a dense earlywood. Here, we assessed if there is a negative association between minimum wood density and early growing-season (spring) precipitation. Using dendrochronology, we studied growth and density data at nine forest stands of three Pinaceae species (Larix sibirica, Pinus nigra, and Pinus sylvestris) widely distributed in three cool–dry Eurasian regions from the forest-steppe (Russia, Mongolia) and Mediterranean (Spain) biomes. We measured for each annual tree ring and the common 1950–2002 period the following variables: earlywood and latewood width, and minimum and maximum wood density. As expected, dry early growing season (spring) conditions were associated with low earlywood production but, most importantly, to high minimum density in the three conifer species. The associations between minimum density and spring precipitation were stronger (r = −0.65) than those observed with earlywood width (r = 0.57). We interpret the relationship between spring water availability and high minimum density as a drought-induced reduction in lumen diameter, hydraulic conductivity, and growth. Consequently, forecasted growing-season drier conditions would translate into increased minimum wood density and reflect a reduction in hydraulic conductivity, radial growth, and wood formation. Given the case-study-like nature of this work, more research on other cold–dry sites with additional conifer species is needed to test if minimum wood density is a robust proxy of early season water availability.

Keywords

Black pine Scots pine Siberian larch Dendroecology Water availability Wood density 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of Spanish Ministry of Economy Projects (Fundiver, CGL2015-69186-C2-1-R). Tree-ring density data were obtained and analysed under support of Russian Science Foundation (Project 14-14-00295).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

468_2017_1559_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15116 kb)

References

  1. Antonova GF, Stasova VV (1993) Effects of environmental factors on wood formation in Scots pine stems. Trees 7:214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block J, Magda VN, Vaganov EA (2004) Temporal and spatial variability of tree growth in mountain forest steppe in Central Asia. In: Trace, Proceedings of the Dendrosymposium, vol 2, pp 46–53. Utrecht, Netherlands, May the 1st–3rd, 2003Google Scholar
  3. Bouche PS, Larter M, Domec JC, Burlett R, Gasson P, Jansen S, Delzon S (2014) A broad survey of hydraulic and mechanical safety in the xylem of conifers. J Exp Bot 65:4419–4431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouriaud O, Leban J, Bert D, Deleuze C (2005) Intra-annual variations in climate influence growth and wood density of Norway spruce Intra-annual variations in climate influence growth and wood density. Tree Physiol 25:651–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouriaud O, Teodosiu M, Kirdyanov AV, Wirth C (2015) Influence of wood density in tree-ring-based annual productivity assessments and its errors in Norway spruce. Biogeosciences 12:6205–6217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briffa KR, Schweingruber FH, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Shiyatov SG, Vaganov EA (1998) Reduced sensitivity of recent tree-growth to temperature at high northern latitudes. Nature 391:678–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briffa KR, Osborn TJ, Schweingruber FH (2004) Large-scale temperature inferences from tree rings: a review. Glob Planet Chang 40:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunn AG (2008) A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia 26:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunn A, Korpela M, Biondi F, Campelo F, Mérian P, Qeadan F, Zang C (2016) dplR: Dendrochronology Program Library in R. R package version 1.6.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplR
  10. Büntgen U, Frank D, Trouet V, Esper J (2010) Diverse climate sensitivity of Mediterranean tree-ring width and density. Trees 24:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Camarero JJ, Olano JM, Parras A (2010) Plastic bimodal xylogenesis in conifers from continental Mediterranean climates. New Phytol 185:471–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Camarero JJ, Rozas V, Olano JM (2014) Minimum wood density of Juniperus thurifera is a robust proxy of spring water availability in a continental Mediterranean climate. J Biogeogr 41:1105–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Camarero JJ, Gazol A, Tardif JC, Conciatori F (2015) Attributing forest responses to global-change drivers: limited evidence of a CO2-fertilization effect in Iberian pine growth. J Biogeogr 42:2220–2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlquist S (1975) Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Swenson NG, Zanne AE (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 12:351–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cleaveland MK (1986) Climatic response of densitometric properties in semiarid site tree rings. Tree-Ring Bull 46:13–29Google Scholar
  17. Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (1990) Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental science. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalla-Salda G, Martínez-Mier A, Cochard H, Rozenberg P (2009) Variation of wood density and hydraulic properties of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) clones related to a heat and drought wave in France. For Ecol Manage 257:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Luis M, Gričar J, Čufar K, Raventós J (2007) Seasonal dynamics of wood formation in Pinus halepensis from dry and semi-arid ecosystems in Spain. IAWA J 28:389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Devi N, Hagedorn F, Moiseev P, Bugmann H, Shiyatov S, Mazepa V, Rigling A (2008) Expanding forests and changing growth forms of Siberian larch at the Polar Urals treeline during the 20th century. Glob Chang Biol 14:1581–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Domec JC, Warren JM, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B (2009) Safety factors for xylem failure by implosion and air-seeding within roots, trunks and branches of young and old conifer trees. IAWA J 30:101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dulamsuren Ch, Hauck M, Bader M, Osokhjargal D, Oyungerel S, Nyambayar S, Runge M, Leuschner C (2009) Water relations and photosynthetic performance in Larix sibirica growing in the forest-steppe ecotone of northern Mongolia. Tree Physiol 29:99–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dulamsuren Ch, Hauck M, Leuschner C (2010) Recent drought stress leads to growth reductions in Larix sibirica in the western Khentey, Mongolia. Glob Chang Biol 16:3024–3035Google Scholar
  24. Dylis NV (1961) Larch in Eastern Siberia and the Far East: variation and natural diversity (in russian). Akad. Nauk SSSR, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  25. Eilmann B, Zweifel R, Buchmann N, Pannatier EG, Rigling A (2011) Drought alters timing, quantity, and quality of wood formation in Scots pine. J Exp Bot 62:2763–2771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Esper J, Frank D, Büntgen U, Verstege A, Hantemirov RM, Kirdyanov AV (2010) Trends and uncertainties in Siberian indicators of 20th century warming. Global Chang Biol 16:386–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fajardo A (2016) Wood density is a poor predictor of competitive ability among individuals of the same species. For Ecol Manage 372:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fritts HC (2001) Tree rings and climate. Caldwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Galván DJ, Büntgen U, Ginzler C, Grudd H, Gutiérrez E, Labuhn I, Camarero JJ (2015) Drought-induced weakening of growth-temperature associations in high-elevation Iberian pines. Glob Planet Chang 124:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gimeno TE, Camarero JJ, Granda E, Pías B, Valladares F (2012) Enhanced growth of Juniperus thurifera under a warmer climate is explained by a positive carbon gain under cold and drought. Tree Physiol 32:326–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gindl W (2001) Cell-wall lignin content related to tracheid dimensions in drought-sensitive Austrian pine (Pinus nigra). IAWA J 22:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gindl W, Grabner M, Wimmer R (2000) The influence of temperature on latewood lignin content in treeline Norway spruce compared with maximum density and ring width. Trees 14:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hacke UG, Sperry JS (2001) Functional and ecological xylem anatomy. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 4:97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA (2001) Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia 126:457–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hacke UG, Lachenbruch B, Pittermann J, Mayr S, Domec JC, Schulte PJ (2015) The hydraulic architecture of conifers. In: Hacke UG (ed) Functional and ecological xylem anatomy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 39–75Google Scholar
  36. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1982) Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 108:225–230Google Scholar
  37. Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol 34:623–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Jyske T, Hölttä T, Mäkinen H, Nöjd P, Lumme I, Spiecker H (2010) The effect of artificially induced drought on radial increment and wood properties of Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 30:103–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirdyanov AV, Hughes MK, Vaganov EA, Schweingruber F, Silkin P (2003) The importance of early summer temperature and date of snow melt for tree growth in Siberian Subarctic. Trees 17:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kirdyanov AV, Vaganov EA, Hughes MK (2007) Separating the climatic signal from tree-ring width and maximum latewood density records. Trees 21:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knorre AA, Siegwolf RTW, Saurer M, Sidorova OV, Vaganov EA, Kirdyanov AV (2010) Twentieth century trends in tree ring stable isotopes (δ13C and δ18O) of Larix sibirica under dry conditions in the forest steppe in Siberia. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 115:G03002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Larjavaara M, Muller-Landau HC (2010) Rethinking the value of high wood density. Funct Ecol 24:701–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larson PR (1994) The vascular cambium: development and structure. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lundgren C (2004) Microfibril angle and density patterns of fertilized and irrigated Norway spruce. Silva Fenn 38:107–117Google Scholar
  46. Mäkinen H, Hynynen J (2014) Wood density and tracheid properties of Scots pine: responses to repeated fertilization and timing of the first commercial thinning. Forestry 87:437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martín JA, Esteban LG, de Palacios P, Fernández FG (2010) Variation in wood anatomical traits of Pinus sylvestris L. between Spanish regions of provenance. Trees 24:1017–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martín-Benito D, Cherubini P, Del Río M, Cañellas I (2008) Growth response to climate and drought in Pinus nigra Arn. trees of different crown classes. Trees 22:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martínez-Vilalta J, Cochard H, Mencuccini M, Sterck F, Herrero A, Korhonen J, Llorens P, Nikinmaa E, Nolè A, Poyatos R (2009) Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe. New Phytol 184:353–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Muller-Landau HC (2004) Interspecific and inter-site variation in wood specific gravity of tropical trees. Biotropica 36:20–32Google Scholar
  51. Niklas KJ (1992) Plant biomechanics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  52. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  53. Olivar J, Rathgeber C, Bravo F (2015) Climate change, tree-ring width and wood density of pines in Mediterranean environments. IAWA J 36:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pacheco A, Camarero JJ, Carrer M (2016) Linking wood anatomy and xylogenesis allows pinpointing of climate and drought influences on growth of coexisting conifers in continental Mediterranean climate. Tree Physiol 36:502–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pasho E, Camarero JJ, Vicente-Serrano SM (2012) Climatic impacts and drought control of radial growth and seasonal wood formation in Pinus halepensis. Trees 26:1875–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pittermann J, Sperry JS, Wheeler JK, Hacke UG, Sikkema EH (2006) Mechanical reinforcement of tracheids compromises the hydraulic efficiency of conifer xylem. Plant Cell Env 29:1618–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Polge H (1978) Fifteen years of wood radiation densitometry. Wood Sci Technol 12:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Poulter B, Pederson N, Liu H, Zhu Z, D’Arrigo R, Ciais P, Davi N, Frank D, Leland C, Myneni R, Piao S, Wang T (2013) Recent trends in inner Asian forest dynamics to temperature and precipitation indicate high sensitivity to climate change. Agric For Meteorol 178–179:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. R Development Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  60. Richardson DM (1998) Ecology and biogeography of pinus. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruiz Diaz Britez M, Sergent A-S, Martinez Meier A, Bréda N, Rozenberg P (2014) Wood density proxies of adaptive traits linked with resistance to drought in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Trees 28:1289–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sánchez-Salguero R, Camarero JJ, Hevia A, Madrigal-González J, Linares JC, Ballesteros-Canovas JA, Sánchez-Miranda A, Alfaro-Sánchez R, Sangüesa-Barreda S, Galván JD, Gutiérrez E, Génova M, Rigling A (2015) What drives growth of Scots pine in continental Mediterranean climates: drought, low temperatures or both? Agric For Meteorol 206:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sangüesa-Barreda G, Camarero JJ, García-Martín A, Hernández R, de la Riva J (2014) Remote-sensing and tree-ring based characterization of forest defoliation and growth loss due to the Mediterranean pine processionary moth. For Ecol Manage 320:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shestakova TA, Gutiérrez E, Kirdyanov AV, Camarero JJ, Génova M, Knorre AA, Linares JC, Resco de Dios V, Sánchez-Salguero R, Voltas J (2016) Forests synchronize their growth in contrasting Eurasian regions in response to climate warming. PNAS 113:662–667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Treter U (2000) Stand structure and growth patterns of the larch forests of Western Mongolia—a dendrochronological approach. Geowiss Abh Reihe A 205:60–66Google Scholar
  66. Tuhkanen S (1980) Climatic parameters and indices in plant geography. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 67:1–110Google Scholar
  67. Vaganov EA, Kirdyanov AV (2010) Dendrochronology of larch trees growing on Siberian permafrost. In: Osawa A, Zyryanova OA, Matsuura Y, Kajimoto T, Wein RW (eds) Permafrost ecosystems: Siberian Larch forests, ecological studies, vol 209. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vaganov EA, Hughes MK, Kirdyanov AV, Schweingruber FH, Silkin PP (1999) Influence of snowfall and melt timing on tree growth in subarctic Eurasia. Nature 400:149–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vaganov EA, Hughes MK, Shashkin AV (2006) Growth dynamics of conifer tree rings. Images of past and future environments. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  70. Vaganov EA, Schulze ED, Skomarkova MV, Knohl A, Brand WA, Roscher C (2009) Intra-annual variability of anatomical structure and δ13C values within tree rings of spruce and pine in alpine, temperate and boreal Europe. Oecologia 161:729–745CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Velisevich SN, Kozlov DS (2006) Effects of temperature and precipitation on radial growth of Siberian Larch in ecotopes with optimal, insufficient, and excessive soil moistening. Russ J Ecol 37:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wan X, Zwiazek JJ, Lieffers VJ, Landhäusser SM (2001) Hydraulic conductance in aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings exposed to low root temperatures. Tree Physiol 21:691–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Yasue K, Funada R, Kobayashi O, Ohtani J (2000) The effects of tracheid dimensions on variations in maximum density of Picea glehnii and relationships to climatic factors. Trees 14:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang SB, Ferry Silk JW, Zhang JL, Cao KF (2011) Spatial patterns of wood traits in China are controlled by phylogeny and the environment. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zobel BJ, van Buijtenen JP (1989) Wood variation. Its causes and control. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Julio Camarero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laura Fernández-Pérez
    • 2
  • Alexander V. Kirdyanov
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tatiana A. Shestakova
    • 5
  • Anastasia A. Knorre
    • 6
  • Vladimir V. Kukarskih
    • 7
  • Jordi Voltas
    • 8
  1. 1.Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC)SaragossaSpain
  2. 2.Forest Ecology and Restoration Group, Department of Life SciencesUniversity of AlcaláMadridSpain
  3. 3.Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RASKrasnoyarskRussia
  4. 4.Institute of Ecology and GeographySiberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussia
  5. 5.Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental SciencesUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  6. 6.Department of ForestrySiberian Federal UniversityKrasnoyarskRussia
  7. 7.Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology SD RASYekaterinburgRussia
  8. 8.Department of Crop and Forest Sciences-AGROTECNIO CenterUniversitat de LleidaLleidaSpain

Personalised recommendations