Abstract
Key message
Mechanical properties of wood constrain most conifers to an excurrent form and limit the width of tree crowns. Development of support tissue alters allometric relations during ontogeny.
Abstract
Biomechanical constraints on tree architecture are explored. Torque on a tree branch is a multiplicative function of mass and moment arm. As such, the need for support rises faster than branch length, which leads to increased taper as branch size increases. This violates assumptions of models, such as the pipe-model theory, for large trees and causes changing allometry with tree size or exposure. Thus, assumptions about optimal design for light capture, self-similarity, or optimal hydraulic architecture need to be modified to account for mechanical constraints and costs. In particular, it is argued that mechanical limitations of compression wood in conifers prevent members of this taxon from developing large branches. With decurrent form ruled out (for larger species), only a conical or excurrent form can develop. Wind is shown to be a major mortality risk for trees. Adaptations for wind include dynamic responses of wood properties and height. It is argued that an adaptation to wind could be the development of an open crown in larger trees to let the wind penetrate, thereby reducing wind-throw risk. It is thus argued that crown shape and branching may result not just from optimal light capture considerations but also from adaptation to and response to wind as well as from mechanical constraints. Results have implications for allometric theory, life history theory, and simulations of tree architecture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alméras T, Fourier M (2009) Biomechanical design and long-term stability of trees: orphological and wood traits involved in the balance between weight increase and the gravitropic reaction. J Theor Biol 256:370–381. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.011
Alméras T, Costes E, Salles J-C (2004) Identification of biomechanical factors involved in stem shape variability between apricot tree varieties. Ann Bot 93:455–468. doi:10.1093/aob/mch054
Alméras T, Thibaut A, Gril J (2005) Effect of circumferential heterogeneity of wood maturation strain, modulus of elasticity and radial growth on the regulation of stem orientation in trees. Trees 19:457–467. doi:10.1007/s00468-005-0407-6
Alméras T, Derycke M, Jaouen G, Beauchêne J, Fournier M (2009) Functional diversity in gravitropic reaction among tropical seedlings in relation to ecological and developmental traits. J Exp Bot 60:4397–4410. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp276
Ancelin P, Courbaud B, Fourcaud T (2004) Development of an individual tree-based mechanical model to predict wind damage within forest stands. Forest Ecol Manag 203:101–121. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.067
Anderson-Teixeira KJ, McGarvey JC, Muller-Landau HC, Park JY, Gonzalez-Akre EB, Herrmann V, Bennett AC, So CV, Bourg NA, Thompson JR, McMahon SM, McShea WJ (2015) Size-related scaling of tree form and function in a mixed-age forest. Funct Ecol 29:1587–1602. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12470
Antin C, Pélissier R, Vincent G, Couteron P (2013) Crown allometries are less responsive than stem allometry to tree size and habitat variations in an Indian monsoon forest. Trees 27:1485–1495
Bao FC, Jiang ZH, Jiang XM, Lu XX, Luo XQ, Zhang SY (2001) Differences in wood properties between juvenile wood and mature wood in 10 species grown in China. Wood Sci Technol 35:363–375. doi:10.1007/s002260100099
Bentley LP, Stegen JC, Savage VM, Smith DD, von Allmen EI, Sperry JS, Reich PB, Enquist BJ (2013) An empirical assessment of tree branching networks and implications for plant allometric scaling models. Ecol Lett 16:1069–1078. doi:10.1111/ele.12127
Borchert R, Slade NA (1981) Bifurcation ratios and the adaptive geometry of trees. Bot Gaz 142:394–401
Borchert R, Tomlinson PB (1984) Architecture and crown geometry in Tabebuia rosea (Bignoniaceae). Am J Bot 71:958–969
Chiba Y (1998) Architectural analysis of relationship between biomass and basal area based on pipe model theory. Ecol Model 108:219–225
Coutand C, Pot G, Badel E (2014) Mechanosensing is involved in the regulation of autostress levels in tension wood. Trees 28:687–697. doi:10.1007/s00468-014-0981-6
Dean TJ, Roberts SD, Gilmore DW, Maguire DA, Long JN, O’Hara KL, Seymour RS (2002) An evaluation of the uniform stress hypothesis based on stem geometry in selected North American conifers. Trees 16:559–568. doi:10.1007/s00468-002-0208-0
Eloy C (2011) Leonardo’s rule, self-similarity, and wind-induced stresses in trees. Phys Rev Lett 107:258101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.258101
Enquist BJ (2002) Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiol 22:1045–1064. doi:10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1045
Farnsworth KD, Niklas KJ (1995) Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants. Funct Ecol 9:355–363
Fisher JB (1992) How predictive are computer simulations of tree architecture? Int J Plant Sci 153:S137–S146
Fisher JB, Hibbs DE (1982) Plasticity of tree architecture: specific and ecological variations found in Aubreville’s model. Am J Bot 69:690–702
Fisher JB, Honda H (1979a) Branch geometry and effective leaf area: a study of terminalia-branching pattern. 1. Theoretical trees. Am J Bot 66:633–644
Fisher JB, Honda H (1979b) Branch geometry and effective leaf area: a study of terminalia-branching pattern. 2. Survey of real trees. Am J Bot 66:645–655
Fisher JB, Stevenson JW (1981) Occurrence of reaction wood in branches of dicotyledons and its role in tree architecture. Bot Gaz 142:82–95
Franklin JF, DeBell DS (1988) Thirty-six years of tree population change in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forest. Can J Forest Res 18:633–639
Franklin JF, Shugart HH, Harmon ME (1987) Tree death as an ecological process. Bioscience 37:550–556
Gehring E, Pezzatti GB, Krebs P, Mazzoleni S, Conedera M (2015) On the applicability of the pipe model theory on the chestnut tree (Castanea sativa Mill.). Trees 29:321–332. doi:10.1007/s00468-014-1093-z
Godin C, Costes E, Sinoquet H (1999) A method for describing plant architecture which integrates topology and geometry. Ann Bot 84:343–357
Greenberg CH, McNab WH (1998) Forest disturbance in hurricane-related downbursts in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina. Forest Ecol Manag 104:179–191
Greenhill AG (1881) Determination of the greatest height consistent with stability that a vertical pole or mast can be made, and of the greatest height to which a tree of given proportions can grow. Proc Camb Philos Soc 4:65–73
Groover A (2016) Gravitropisms and reaction woods of forest trees—evolution, functions and mechanisms. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/nph.13968
Hamant O (2013) Widespread mechanosensing controls the structure behind the architecture in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:654–660. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.006
Hamant O, Traas J (2010) The mechanics behind plant development. New Phytol 185:369–385. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03100.x
Harcombe PA, Marks PL (1983) Five years of tree death in a Fagus-Magnolia forest, southeast Texas (USA). Oecologia 57:49–54
Honda H, Fisher JB (1978) Tree branch angle: maximizing effective leaf area. Science 199:888–890
Horn HS (1971) The adaptive geometry of trees. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
Kane B, Modarres-Sadeghi Y, James KR, Reiland M (2014) Effects of crown structure on the sway characteristics of large decurrent trees. Trees 28:151–159. doi:10.1007/s00468-013-0938-1
King DA (1986) Tree form, height growth, and susceptibility to wind damage in Acer saccharum. Ecology 67:980–990
King DA (1990) The adaptive significance of tree height. Am Nat 135:809–828
Loehle C (1986) Phototropism of whole trees: effects of habitat and growth form. Am Midl Nat 116:190–196
Loehle C (1996) Optimal defensive investments in plants. Oikos 75:299–302
Loehle C (2000) Strategy space and the disturbance spectrum: a life-history model for tree species coexistence. Am Nat 156:14–33. doi:10.1086/303369
Mandelbrot BB (1978) The fractal geometry of trees and other natural phenomena. In: Miles RE, Serra J (eds) Geometrical probability and biological structures: Buffon’s 200th anniversary. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–249
Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco CA
McMahon TA, Kronauer RE (1976) Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. J Theor Biol 59:443–466
Niklas KJ (1991) The elastic moduli and mechanics of Populus tremuloides (Salicaceae) petioles in bending and torsion. Am J Bot 78:989–996
Niklas KJ (1995) Size-dependent allometry of tree height, diameter and trunk-taper. Ann Bot 75:217–227
Niklas KJ (1998) The influence of gravity and wind on land plant evolution. Rev Palaeobot Palyno 102:1–14
Nishimura TB (2005) Tree characteristics related to stem breakage of Picea glehnii and Abies sachalinensis. Forest Ecol Manag 215:295–306. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.018
Ogawa K (2015) Mathematical considerations of the pipe model theory in woody plant species. Trees 29:695–704. doi:10.1007/s00468-014-1147-2
Pearcy RW, Muraoka H, Valladares F (2005) Crown architecture in sun and shade environments: assessing function and trade-offs with a three dimensional simulation model. New Phytol 166:791–800. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01328.x
Perttunen J, Sievänen R (2005) Incorporating Lindenmayer systems for architectural development in a functional-structural tree model. Ecol Model 181:479–491. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.06.034
Peterson CJ (2000) Damage and recovery of tree species after two different tornadoes in the same old growth forest: a comparison of infrequent wind disturbances. Forest Ecol Manag 135:237–252. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00283-8
Peterson CJ (2007) Consistent influence of tree diameter and species on damage in nine eastern North America tornado blowdowns. Forest Ecol Manag 250:96–108. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.013
Pittermann J, Sperry JS, Wheeler JK, Hacke UG, Sikkema EH (2006) Mechanical reinforcement of tracheids compromises the hydraulic efficiency of conifer xylem. Plant Cell Environ 29:1618–1628. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01539.x
Pot G, Coutand C, Toussaint E, Le Cam J-B, Saudreau M (2014) A model to simulate the gravitropic response and internal stresses in trees, considering the progressive maturation of wood. Trees 28:1235–1248. doi:10.1007/s00468-014-1033-y
Raulier F, Ung C-H, Ouellet D (1996) Influence of social status on crown geometry and volume increment in regular and irregular black spruce stands. Can J Forest Res 26:1742–1753
Read J, Stokes A (2006) Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. Am J Bot 93:1546–1565. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.10.1546
Richter JP (1970) The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. Dover Publications, Dover
Roden JS (2003) Modeling the light interception and carbon gain of individual fluttering aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) leaves. Trees 17:117–126. doi:10.1007/s00468-002-0213-3
Rouvinen S, Kuuluvainen T (1997) Structure and asymmetry of tree crowns in relation to local competition in a natural mature Scots pine forest. Can J Forest Res 27:890–902
Scott RE, Mitchell SJ (2005) Empirical modelling of windthrow risk in partially harvested stands using tree, neighbourhood, and stand attributes. Forest Ecol Manag 218:193–209. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.012
Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964a) A quantitative analysis of plant form. Pipe model theory. I. Basic analysis. Jpn J Ecol 14:97–105
Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964b) A quantitative analysis of plant form. Pipe model theory. II. Further evidences of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Jpn J Ecol 14:133–139
Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Perttunen J, Hakula H (2000) Components of functional-structural tree models. Ann Forest Sci 57:399–412. doi:10.1051/forest:2000131
Sillett SC, Van Pelt R, Carroll AL, Kramer RD, Ambrose AR, Trask D (2015) How do tree structure and old age affect growth potential of California redwoods? Ecol Monogr 85:181–212. doi:10.1890/14-1016.1
Skatter S, Kucera B (2000) Tree breakage from torsional wind loading due to crown asymmetry. Forest Ecol Manag 135:97–103. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00301-7
Smith WK, Brewer CA (1994) The adaptive importance of shoot and crown architecture in conifer trees. Am Nat 143:528–532
Smith DD, Sperry JS, Enquist BJ, Savage VM, McCulloh KA, Bentley LP (2014) Deviation from symmetrically self-similar branching in trees predicts altered hydraulics, mechanics, light interception and metabolic scaling. New Phytol 201:217–229. doi:10.1111/nph.12487
Sperry JS, Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA (2008) Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees. Plant Cell Environ 31:632–645. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01765.x
Stathers RJ, Rollerson TP, Mitchell SJ (1994) Windthrow handbook for British Columbia forests. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Program
Takenaka A (1994) A simulation model of tree architecture development based on growth response to local light environment. J Plant Res 107:321–330
Tomlinson PB (1987) Architecture of tropical plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:1–21
Vogel S (1989) Drag and reconfiguration of broad leaves in high winds. J Exp Bot 40:941–948
Vogel S (2007) Living in a physical world XI. To twist or bend when stressed. J Biosci 32:643–655. doi:10.1007/s12038-007-0064-6
Yamazaki K (2011) Gone with the wind: trembling leaves may deter herbivory. Biol J Linn Soc 104:738–747. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01776.x
Yang X-D, Yan E-R, Chang SX, Da L-J, Wang X-H (2015) Tree architecture varies with forest succession in evergreen broad-leaved forests in eastern China. Trees 29:43–57. doi:10.1007/s00468-014-1054-6
Zeide B (1998) Fractal analysis of foliage distribution in loblolly pine crowns. Can J Forest Res 28:106–114
Acknowledgments
No outside funding was utilized for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest in this work.
Additional information
Communicated by M. Buckerdige.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loehle, C. Biomechanical constraints on tree architecture. Trees 30, 2061–2070 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1433-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1433-2