Skip to main content
Log in

Non-destructive measurement of leaf area and dry biomass in Tectona grandis

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

The surface area and dry biomass of leaves can be satisfactorily estimated from simple dimension measurements. These data are useful for estimating carbon allocation in trees using functional–structural growth models.

Abstract

Leaf area and leaf dry biomass are key parameters linked to plant production and they are used in functional–structural plant models to simulate plant growth, but they are difficult to ascertain. Measuring leaf dimensions (length and width) to estimate them provides a non-destructive and rapid approach that can be used in the field. This was tested on teak (Tectona grandis) in Togo. Leaves were sampled to maximize variability in sizes along two categories of axes and at different ranks on the growth units. Two different equations were determined to estimate leaf area and dry biomass from leaf dimensions. The relation between leaf area (A) and the product of length (L) × width (Wi) was defined by the linear equation A = 0.60 × L × Wi whereas dry biomass (We) was predicted by a power law We = 0.004 × (L × Wi)1.11. This method could also be tested and applied to other species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot 99:375–407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bell A (1991) Plant Form: An illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco S, Pitelli RA, Pitelli AMCM (2003) Estimativa da area foliar de Typha latifolia usando dimenso es lineares do limbo foliar. Planta Daninha 21:257–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Reffye P, Hu B (2003) Relevant choices in botany and mathematics for building efficient dynamic plant growth models: the GreenLab case. In: Hu B, Jaeger M (eds) Plant growth models and applications. Tsinghua University Press/Springer, Beijing/Berlin, pp 87–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy H (2009) Leaf area estimation in some species of fruit tree by using models as a non-destructive method. Fruits 64(1):45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy H, Demirsoy L (2003) A validated leaf area prediction model for some cherry cultivars in Turkey. Pak J Bot 35:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy H, Demirsoy L, Uzun S, Ersoy B (2004) Non-destructive leaf area estimation in peach. Eur J Hort Sci 69:144–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcaud T, Zhang XP, Stokes A, Lambers H, Koerner C (2008) Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Ann Bot 101:1053–1063

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greer DH (2000) Photon flux density dependence of carbon acquisition and demand in relation to shoot growth of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) vines grown in controlled environments. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiannan K, Kailasam C, Chandaragiri KK, Sankaran N (2002) Allometric model for leaf area estimation in black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). J Agric Crop Sci 188:138–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy C, Saint-André L, Auclair D (2007) Practical methods for non-destructive measurement of tree leaf area. Agroforest Syst 71:99–108. doi:10.1007/s10457-007-9077-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy C, Guéroult M, Wahyuni NS, Escoute J, Céréghino R, Sabatier S, Auclair D (2008) Morphogenetic trends in the morphological, optical and biochemical features of phyllodes in Acacia mangium Willd (Mimosaceae). Trees Struct Funct 23(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy C, Sabatier S, Wahyuni NS, Barczi JF, Dauzat J, Laurans M, Auclair D (2009) Virtual trees and light capture: a method for optimizing agroforestry stand design. Agroforest Syst 77(1):37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marron N, Villar M, Dreyer E, Delay D, Boudouresque E, Petit J-M, Delmotte FM, Guehl J-M, Brignolas F (2005) Diversity of leaf traits related to productivity in 31 Populus deltoides × Populus nigra clones. Tree Physiol 25:425–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monsi M, Saeki T (2005) On the factor light in plant communities and its importance for matter production. Ann Bot 95:549–567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto ACR, Rodrigues TJD, Barbosa JC, Leite IC (2004) Leaf area prediction models for Zinnia elegans Jacq., Zinnia haageana Regel. and “profusion cherry”. Sci Agric 61:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prusinkiewicz P (2004) Modeling plant growth and development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7(1):79–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasband WS (2014) ImageJ. U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/

  • Seleznyova AN, Greer DH (2001) Effects of temperature and leaf position on leaf area expansion of Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) shoots: development of a modeling framework. Ann Bot 88:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serdar U, Demirsoy H (2006) Non-destructive leaf area estimation in chestnut. Sci Hortic 108:227–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DW, Dwyer LM (1999) Mathematical characterization of leaf shape and area in maize hybrids. Crop Sci 39:422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville WAT (1944) Studies on nutrition as qualified by development in Musa cavendishii Lambert. Qld J Agric Sci 1:1–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Taugourdeau O, Dauzat J, Griffon S et al (2012) Retrospective analysis of tree architecture in silver fir (Abies alba Mill.): ontogenetic trends and responses to environmental variability. Ann Forest Sci 69:713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tivet F, SilveiraPinheiro B, de Raïssac M, Dingkuhn M (2001) Leaf blade dimensions of rice (Oryza sativa L., Oryza glaberrima Steud.). Relationships between tillers and the main stem. Ann Bot 88:507–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondjo K, Brancheriau L, Sabatier SA, Kokutse AD, Akossou A, Kokou K, Fourcaud T (2014) Is the variability of key wood properties linked with the variability of key architectural traits? Case of planted teak in Togo regarding thinning and provenance. Ann Forest Sci. doi:10.1007/s13595-014-0425-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Wright IJ (2003) The leaf size-twig size spectrum and its relationship to other important spectra of variation among species. Oecologia 135:621–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies : some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willaume M, Lauri PE, Sinoquet H (2004) Light interception in apple trees influenced by canopy architecture manipulation. Trees 18:705–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contribution statement

Kodjo Tondjo wrote the article, took the experimental measurements and contributed to the data analysis and discussion. Sylvie-Annabel Sabatier, Loïc Brancheriau and Acardius Akossou carried out the data extractions and performed the statistical analysis. Adzo Dzifa Kokutse, Kouami Kokou and Thierry Fourcaud supervised the work and coordinated the research project.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by the AUF-PCSI programme, by a grant from CIRAD AIRD and by AMAP [Botany and Computational Plant Architecture, joint research unit which associates CIRAD (UMR51), CNRS (UMR5120), INRA (UMR931), IRD (2M123), and Montpellier 2 University (UM27)]; http://amap.cirad.fr/. The authors thank the owner of the experimental plots, Professor Messanvi GBEANSSOR at the University of Lomé and the University’s students for their help with measurements in the field.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loïc Brancheriau.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Matyssek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tondjo, K., Brancheriau, L., Sabatier, SA. et al. Non-destructive measurement of leaf area and dry biomass in Tectona grandis . Trees 29, 1625–1631 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1227-y

Keywords

Navigation