Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

European beech grows better and is less drought sensitive in mixed than in pure stands: tree neighbourhood effects on radial increment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

Tree neighbourhood can affect the radial increment of Fagus sylvatica and its sensitivity to environmental fluctuation, which partly depends on soil clay content and species identity of the neighbours.

Abstract

In a temperate deciduous forest, we analysed the tree ring chronologies of 152 Fagus sylvatica L. target trees from tree neighbourhoods varying in species composition and tree diversity. We hypothesised that the species identity of the neighbour trees influences radial stem increment and environmental sensitivity of growth of the target trees. Further, we postulated that the effect was stronger under low abiotic stress as expressed by soil clay content and that beech individuals could have a higher wood production in mixed than in monospecific stands. We measured radial increment and analysed the growth response to, and recovery from, selected stress events. Fagus trees in a neighbourhood with more than 30 % of the canopy’s ‘influence sphere’ occupied by allospecific trees had a higher mean stem increment, a lower increment sensitivity to environmental fluctuation and a smaller growth depression after the 1976 drought than beech trees surrounded by conspecific trees. We found that the neighbours’ identity can influence beech growth: positive effects on mean increment and a reduced sensitivity were found for Tilia, Fraxinus and Acer neighbourhoods, but not for Quercus neighbourhoods. The growth-promoting effect was significant on clay-poorer soil, but not on clay-richer soil. Tree species diversity in the neighbourhood tended to correlate positively with mean stem growth and negatively with the sensitivity to environmental fluctuation. We conclude that the neighbourhood of a tree can influence its mean stem increment and growth sensitivity to environmental fluctuation in temperate mixed forests with the effect partly depending on the neighbours’ species identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoroso MM, Turnblom EC (2006) Comparing productivity of pure and mixed Douglas-fir and western hemlock plantations in the Pacific Northwest. Can J For Res 36:1484–1496. doi:10.1139/X06-042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study: studies in the organic production, structure, increment and yield of forest stands. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Badeau V, Dupouey JL, Becker M, Picard JF (1995) Long-term growth trends of Fagus sylvatica L. in northeastern France. A comparison between high and low density stands. Acta Oecol 16:571–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie MGL, Pilcher JR (1973) A simple crossdating program for tree-ring research. Tree-ring Bull 33:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohdanecký J (1926) Zur Frage der Erziehung junger Fichtenbestände. Forstwiss Cent.bl 48:777–783. doi:10.1007/BF02424299

  • Bonn S (1998) Dendroökologische Untersuchung der Konkurrenzdynamik in Buchen/Eichen-Mischbeständen und zu erwartende Modifikationen durch Klimaänderungen. Contrib For Sci 3:1–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F, Armas C, Coll L, Corcket E, Delzon S, Forey E, Kikvidze Z, Olofsson J, Pugnaire F, Quiroz CL, Saccone P, Schiffers K, Seifan M, Touzard B, Michalet R (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01295.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill JF, Casper BB (2000) Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground. Oikos 90:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (1995) Positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev 61:306–349. doi:10.1007/BF02912621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canham CD, LePage PT, Coates KD (2004) A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition: effects of shading versus crowding. Can J For Res 34:778–787. doi:10.1139/X03-232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canham CD, Papaik MJ, Uriarte M, McWilliams WH, Jenkins JC, Twery MJ (2006) Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests. Ecol Appl 16:540–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HYH, Klinka K, Mathey AH, Wang X, Varga P, Chourmouzis C (2003) Are mixed-species stands more productive than single-species stands: an empirical test of three forest types in British Columbia and Alberta. Can J For Res 33:1227–1237. doi:10.1139/X03-048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogee J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, De Noblet N, Friend AD, Friedlingstein P, Grunwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–533. doi:10.1038/nature03972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeClerck FAJ, Barbour MG, Sawyer JO (2006) Species richness and stand stability in conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada. Ecology 87:2787–2799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein D, Bauch J (1969) Beitrag zur Rationalisierung eines dendrochronologischen Verfahrens und zur Analyse seiner Aussagesicherheit. Forstwiss Cent.bl 88:230–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Leuschner C (2010) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 6th edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner A, Sturm K, Rickert C, von Oheimb G, Härdtle W (2013) Crown size–growth relationships of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) are driven by the interplay of disturbance intensity and inter-specific competition. For Ecol Manage 302:178–184. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraver S, D’Amato AW, Bradford JB, Jonsson BG, Jönsson M, Esseen PA (in press) Tree growth and competition in an old‐growth Picea abies forest of boreal Sweden: influence of tree spatial patterning. J Veg Sci. doi:10.1111/jvs.12096

  • Frech A (2006) Walddynamik in Mischwäldern des Nationalparks Hainich—Untersuchung der Mechanismen und Prognose der Waldentwicklung. Ber Forsch.zent Waldökosyst Göttingen (A) 196:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritts HC (2001) Tree rings and climate. Blackburn Press, Caldwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer T, Horna V, Leuschner C (2008) Variability in radial sap flux density patterns and sapwood area among seven co-occurring temperate broad-leaved tree species. Tree Physiol 28:1821–1830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia AC, Freitas H (2008) Intraspecific competition and water use efficiency in Quercus suber: evidence of an optimum tree density? Trees 22:521–530. doi:10.1007/s00468-008-0212-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissino-Mayer HD, Kaennel Dobbertin M (2003) Dendrochronology species database. Names of tree and shrub species for which tree rings have been analysed in the published literature. Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland. http://www01.wsl.ch/species/about.html

  • Hegyi F (1974) A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. In: Fries J (ed) Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, pp 74–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel D, Leuschner C (2006) The in situ root chamber: a novel tool for the experimental analysis of root competition in forest soils. Pedobiologia 50:217–224. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollstein E (1980) Mitteleuropäische Eichenchronologie: Trierer dendrochronologische Forschungen zur Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte. von Zabern, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363. doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob M, Weland N, Platner C, Schaefer M, Leuschner C, Thomas FM (2009) Nutrient release from decomposing leaf litter of temperate deciduous forest trees along a gradient of increasing tree species diversity. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2122–2130. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.07.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob M, Leuschner C, Thomas FM (2010) Productivity of temperate broad-leaved forest stands differing in tree species diversity. Ann For Sci 67:503. doi:10.1051/forest/2010005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köcher P, Gebauer T, Horna V, Leuschner C (2009) Leaf water status and stem xylem flux in relation to soil drought in five temperate broad-leaved tree species with contrasting water use strategies. Ann For Sci 66:101. doi:10.1051/forest/2008076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang C (2008) Diversität der Ektomykorrhizen in verschieden artenreichen Laubbaumbeständen im Nationalpark Hainich. Gött Forstwiss 1:1–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuschner HH, Sass-Klaassen U, Jansma E, Baillie MGL, Spurk M (2002) Subfossil European bog oaks: population dynamics and long-term growth depressions as indicators of changes in the Holocene hydro-regime and climate. Holocene 12:695–706. doi:10.1191/0959683602hl584rp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuschner C, Jungkunst HF, Fleck S (2009) Functional role of forest diversity: pros and cons of synthetic stands and across-site comparisons in established forests. Basic Appl Ecol 10:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2008.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre FT, Callaway RM., Valladares F, Lortie CJ (2009) Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J Ecol 199–205. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01476.x

  • Mailly D, Turbis S, Pothier D (2003) Predicting basal area increment in a spatially explicit, individual tree model: a test of competition measures with black spruce. Can J For Res 33:435–443. doi:10.1139/X02-122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man R, Lieffers VJ (1999) Are mixtures of aspen and white spruce more productive than single species stands? For Chron 75:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinen C, Leuschner C, Ryan NT, Hertel D (2009) No evidence of spatial root system segregation and elevated fine root biomass in multi-species temperate broad-leaved forests. Trees 23:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mölder A, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Schmidt W (2008) Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: raised by tree richness or beaten by beech? For Ecol Manage 256:272–281. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin X, Fahse L, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Bugmann H (2011) Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. Ecol Lett 14:1211–1219. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01691.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller A (2007) Jahrringanalytische Untersuchungen zum Informationsgehalt von Holzkohle-Rückständen der historischen Meilerköhlerei. PhD thesis, Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Germany

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1990) Forest Stand Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen BS (1998) The role of stress in the mortality of midwestern oaks as indicated by growth prior to death. Ecology 79:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF, Mountford EP (1996) Effects of drought on beech in Lady Park Wood, an unmanaged mixed deciduous woodland. Forestry 69:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotto D, Víquez E, Montagnini F, Kanninen M (2004) Pure and mixed forest plantations with native species of the dry tropics of Costa Rica: a comparison of growth and productivity. For Ecol Manage 190:359–372. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2003.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piutti E, Cescatti A (1997) A quantitative analysis of the interactions between climatic response and intraspecific competition in European beech. Can J For Res 27:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plauborg KU (2004) Analysis of radial growth responses to changes in stand density for four tree species. For Ecol Manage 188:65–75. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podlaski R (2002) Radial growth trends of fir (Abies alba Mill.), beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Świętokrzyski National Park (Poland). J Forest Sci 48:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H (1995) Zum Einfluss der Baumverteilungsmusters auf den Bestandeszuwachs. Allg Forst- Jagdztg 166:190–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H, Schütze G (2009) Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur J For Res 128:183–204. doi:10.1007/s10342-008-0215-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H, Block J, Dieler J, Dong P, Kohnle U, Nagel J, Spellmann H, Zingg A (2010) Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient. Annals of Forest Science 67:712. doi:10.1051/forest/2010037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rewald B, Leuschner C (2009a) Does root competition asymmetry increase with water availability? Plant Ecol Divers 2:255–264. doi:10.1080/17550870903022865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rewald B, Leuschner C (2009b) Belowground competition in a broad-leaved temperature mixed forest: pattern analysis and experiments in a four-species stand. Eur J For Res 128:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemer T (1994) Über die Varianz von Jahrringbreiten. Statistische Methoden für die Auswertung der jährlichen Dickenzuwächse von Bäumen unter sich ändernden Lebensbedingungen. Ber Forsch.zent Waldökosyst Göttingen (A) 121:1–375

  • Rothe A, Binkley D (2001) Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 31:1855–1870. doi:10.1139/x01-120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas V, Olano JM (2013) Environmental heterogeneity and neighbourhood interference modulate the individual response of Juniperus thurifera tree-ring growth to climate. Dendrochronologia 3:105–113. doi:10.1016/j.dendro.2012.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharnweber T, Manthey M, Criegee C, Bauwe A, Schröder C, Wilmking M (2011) Drought matters—declining precipitation influences growth of Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L. in north-eastern Germany. For Ecol Manage 262:947–961. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt I, Leuschner C, Mölder A, Schmidt W (2009) Structure and composition of the seed bank in monospecific and tree species-rich temperate broad-leaved forests. For Ecol Manage 257:695–702. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S (1996) Decomposition analysis of competitive symmetry and size structure dynamics. Ann Appl Biol 77:47–58. doi:10.1006/anbo 1996.0006

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S, Weiner J (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447–455. doi:10.1007/s004420050397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg IF, Fedor PJ (2003) A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon–Wiener’ Index. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:177–179. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00015.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talkner U, Jansen M, Beese FO (2009) Soil phosphorus status and turnover in central-European beech forest ecosystems with differing tree species diversity. Eur J Soil Sci 60:338–346. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01117.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: A stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10854–10861

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tome M, Burkhart HE (1989) Distance-dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees. For Sci 35:816–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacek S, Lepš J (1996) Spatial dynamics of forest decline: The role of neighbouring trees. J Veg Sci 7:789–798. doi:10.2307/3236457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Seebach C (1845) Der modifizierte Buchen-Hochwaldbetrieb. Kritische Blätter für Forst- und Jagdwissenschaft in Verbindung mit mehreren Forstmännern und Gelehrten 21:147–185

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wettberg EJ, Weiner J (2003) Larger Triticum aestivum plants do not preempt nutrient-rich patches in a glasshouse experiment. Plant Ecol 169:85–92. doi:10.1023/A:1026253007056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber P, Bugmann H, Fonti P, Rigling A (2008) Using a retrospective dynamic competition index to reconstruct forest succession. For Ecol Manage 254:96–106. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welden CW, Slauson WL (1986) The intensity of competition versus its importance: an overlooked distinction and some implications. Q Rev Biol 61:23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M (2003) Preference of plant species for woodlands with differing habitat continuities. Flora 198:444–460. doi:10.1078/0367-2530-00118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Chen HYH. Reich PB (2012) Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J Ecol 100:742–749. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Philippe Marchand for taking hemispheric photos, Laura Rose for support in cross-dating tree ring series, Hanns Hubert Leuschner for his advice and support in tree ring analysis and various helpers for stem coring. The study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Research Training Group 1086. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Inga Mölder

    Present address: Energieagentur Region Göttingen e.V, Berliner Str. 4, 37073, Göttingen, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plant Ecology and Ecosystems Research, Albrecht von Haller Institute for Plant Sciences, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, 37073, Göttingen, Germany

    Inga Mölder & Christoph Leuschner

Authors
  1. Inga Mölder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christoph Leuschner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Leuschner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mölder, I., Leuschner, C. European beech grows better and is less drought sensitive in mixed than in pure stands: tree neighbourhood effects on radial increment. Trees 28, 777–792 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-0991-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-0991-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation