, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 1287–1298 | Cite as

Crown age estimation of a monocotyledonous tree species Dracaena cinnabari using logistic regression

  • Radim Adolt
  • Hana Habrova
  • Petr Madera
Original Paper


Unique woodlands of Dracaena cinnabari (DC) are at risk throughout most of their range (Socotra Island, Yemen) as a result of missing regeneration and overmaturity. Effective conservation measures depend on reliable predictions of future population dynamics, which depend on accurate data on current age structure. However, age determination of Dracaena sp. has long been a scientific challenge, because the common method of tree ring counts cannot be applied to this or to most other monocotyledonous trees. In the present study, the indirect method for crown age estimation proposed by Adolt and Pavlis (Trees 18:43–53, 2004) was further developed using a more appropriate statistical technique and an intuitive model formulation. This new technique is based on the relationship between the number of branching orders and the number of flowering events that result from a specific growth pattern. We used logistic regression to directly model annual flowering probability, the reciprocal value of which corresponds to the length of the interval between flowering events. Our methodology was applied to data sets collected at two ecologically distinct sites. In Firmihin, the time between flowering events decreases from 28 years between the first and second event to 10 years between the 25th and 26th event. The length of time between flower events in Skant, however, was estimated to be a constant value of 6.5 years. We propose the application of generalised mixed-effects models and methods of survey sampling to improve the accuracy of crown age estimation in DC. Our methodology may also be useful for age estimations of other tree species with similar growth patterns, such as Dracaena draco and Aloe dichotoma.


Dracaena cinnabari Tree age Age estimation Socotra Flowering probability Generalised linear model Generalised linear mixed model Logistic regression 



This project was supported by the Internal Granting Agency of the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology at Mendel University in Brno (Project 12/2010) and by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (Project MSM 6215648902).


  1. Adolt R, Pavlis J (2004) Age structure and growth of Dracaena cinnabari populations on Socotra. Trees 18:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti A (2002) Categorial data analysis. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabesi L (2003) A Monte Carlo integration approach to Horvitz–Thompson estimation in replicated environmental designs. Int J Stat LXI:355–374Google Scholar
  4. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Henry M, Stevens H, White JS (2008) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24(3):127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA (2006) Lifetime growth patterns and ages of Bolivian rain forest trees obtained by tree ring analysis. J Ecol 94:481–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA (2006) The use of tree rings in tropical forest management: projecting timber yields of four Bolivian tree species. For Ecol Manag 226:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brienen RJW, Zuidema PA, Martinez-Ramos M (2010) Attaining the canopy in dry and moist tropical forests: strong differences in tree growth trajectories reflect variation in growing conditions. Oecologia 163:485–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calama R, Montero G (2005) Multilevel linear mixed model for tree diameter increment in stone pine (Pinus pinea): a calibrating approach. Silva Fenn 39(1):37–54Google Scholar
  9. Calama R, Montero G (2006) Stand and tree-level variability on stem form and tree volume in Pinus pinea L.: a mutilevel random components approach. Sist Recur For 15:24–41Google Scholar
  10. Cochran GW (1977) Sampling Techniques. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregoire GT, Valentine TH (2008) Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. ISBN 978-1-58488-370Google Scholar
  12. Habrova H (2004) Geobiocoenological differentiation as a tool for sustainable land-use of Socotra Island. Ekologia 23:47–57Google Scholar
  13. Habrova H (2007) Climate of Soqotra with a view to rains. Tayf Soqotra Newslett 4:15–16Google Scholar
  14. Habrova H, Cermak Z, Pavlis J (2009) Dragon’s blood tree threatened by overmaturity, not by extinction: dynamics of a Dracaena cinnabari woodland in the mountains of Soqotra. Biol Conserv 142:772–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heuret P, Barthelemy D, Guedon Y, Columier J, Tancre X (2002) Synchronization of growth, branching and flowering processes in the South American tropical tree Cecropia obtusa (cecropiaceae). Am J Bot 89(7):1180–1187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hubalkova I (2011) Prediction of dragon’s blood tree (Dracaena cinnabari balf.) stand sample density on Soqotra Island (key study). J Landsc Ecol 4:5–20Google Scholar
  17. Kral K, Pavlis J (2006) The first detailed land cover map of Socotra Island by Landsat/ETM+data. Int J Remote Sens 27(15):3239–3250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lusk HC, Smith B (1998) Life history differences and tree species coexistence in an old-growth New Zealand rain forest. Ecology 79:795–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magdefrau K (1975) The age of large Dracaena specimens of Tenerife. Flora 164:347–357Google Scholar
  20. Norton AD, Ogden J (1990) Problems with the use of tree rings in the study of forest population dynamics. In: Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (eds) Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental science. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Ogden J (1985) Past, present and future: studies on population dynamics of some long-lived trees. In: White J (eds) Studies on plant demography: a festschrift for John L Harper. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, 2009. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
  23. Razdorskij VF (1954) Anatomie rostlin, 1st edn. Nakladatelsví Československé Akademie Věd, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  24. Rozas V (2003) Tree age estimates in Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur: testing previous and improved methods. Plant Ecol 167:193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rozendaal DMA, Zuidema PA (2011) Dendroecology in the tropics: a review. Trees Struct Funct 25:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J (2003) Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  27. Scholte P, De Geest P (2010) The climate of Socotra Island (Yemen): a first-time assessment of the timing of the monsoon wind reversal and its influence on precipitation and vegetation patterns. J Arid Environ 74(11):1507–1515. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.017 Google Scholar
  28. Smilauer R (2007) Moderni regresni metody. Bilogicka Fakulta JU, Ceske BudejoviceGoogle Scholar
  29. Stewart HG (1986) Population dynamics of a montane conifer forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon, USA. Ecology 67:543–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Symon ED (1974) The growth of Dracaena draco—dragon’s blood tree. J Arnold Arbor 55:51–58Google Scholar
  31. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Trincado G, Burkhart E (2006) A generalized approach for modeling and localizing stem profile curves. For Sci 52:670–681Google Scholar
  33. Venables NW, Ripley DB (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0
  34. Worbes M (2002) One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics a brief history and an outlook to future challenges. Dendrochronologia 20(1–2):217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zalamea CP, Stevenson PR, Madrinan S, Aubert PM, Heuret P (2008) Growth pattern and age determination for Cecropia sciadophyla (urticaceae). Am J Bot 95(3):263–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmermann HM, Tomlinson BP (1969) The vascular system in the axis of Dracaena fragrans (Agavacea). J Arnold Arbor 50:370–383Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NFI Methodology and AnalysisForest Management Institute Brandys nad LabemKromerizCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Forestry and Wood TechnologyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations