Trees

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 653–661

Defoliation increases risk of carbon starvation in root systems of mature aspen

Original Paper

Abstract

Large trees are noted to decline and die over several years after defoliation or extended periods of drought. The underlying mechanisms of this decline are thought to be driven by moisture limitations to photosynthesis, but alternative considerations also suggest carbon storage limitations as a driver. This research assesses the non-structural carbohydrate reserves in crowns and roots tissues during and after defoliation by insects in trembling aspen. We monitored the non-structural carbon reserves of nine tall mature aspen forest stands over 8 years, including two defoliation events. We report on the carbohydrate dynamics in root and crown tissues during and after defoliation. Following defoliation, branch reserves recovered to levels of undefoliated control trees within the same season, while roots took up to 2 years to recover. We argue that in large trees, tissues closest to the foliage are the first sinks to access C in the phloem stream, while roots, which are more distal and separated by a long bole, will only receive adequate supplies of C when the other more proximate sinks are sated. These results support the hypothesis that in times of limited carbon assimilation, root tissues in mature trees experience the longest reduction in carbon reserves, which likely plays a critical role in tree decline and mortality.

Keywords

C-limitation in roots Defoliation Non-structural carbohydrate reserves Phloem transport in tall trees Populus tremuloides Starch 

References

  1. Adams HD, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Barron-Gafford GA, Villegas JC, Breshears DD, Zou CB, Troch PA, Huxman TE (2009) Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality: implications for regional die-off under global-change-type drought. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106:7063–7066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim JH, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manage 259:660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartos DL, Campbell RB Jr (1998) Decline of quaking aspen in the Interior West—examples from Utah. Range 20:17–24Google Scholar
  4. Battaglia M, Cherry ML, Deadle CL, Sands PJ, Hingston A (1998) Prediction of leaf area index in eucalypt plantations: effect of water stress and temperature. Tree Physiol 18:521–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Batzer HO, Hodson AC, Schneider AE (1954) Preliminary results of an inquiry into effects of defoliation of aspen trees by the forest tent caterpillar. School of Forestry, University of Minnesota, St. Paul Forestry Notes 31Google Scholar
  6. Bigler C, Gavin DG, Gunning C, Veblen TT (2007) Drought induces lagged tree mortality in a subalpine forest in the Rocky Mountains. Oikos 116:1983–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E (2006) Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann For Sci 63:625–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carnicer J, Coll M, Ninyerola M, Pons X, Sánchez G, Peñuelas J (2010) Widespread crown condition decline, food web disruption, and amplified tree mortality with increased climate change-type drought. Proc Nat Acad Sci. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1010070108
  9. Chapin FS III, Schulze ED, Mooney HA (1990) The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 21:423–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chow PS, Landhäusser SM (2004) A method for routine measurements of total sugar and starch content in woody plant tissues. Tree Physiol 24:1129–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dang Q-L, Margolis HA, Coyea M, Sy M, Collatz GJ (1997) Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal treess: roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference. Tree Physiol 17:521–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Schepper V, Steppe K (2010) Development and verification of a water and sugar transport model using measured stem diameter variations. J Exp Bot 61:2083–2099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Orio AP, Callas R, Schaefer RJ (2005) Forty-eight year decline and fragmentation of aspen (Populus tremuloides) in the South Warner Mountains of California. For Ecol Manage 206:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dickmann DI, Nguyen PV, Pregitzer KS (1996) Effects of irrigation and coppicing on above-ground growth, physiology, and fine-root dynamics of two field-grown hybrid poplar clones. For Ecol Manage 80:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environment Canada (2010) www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climateData (Accessed 20 March 2010)
  16. Frey BR, Lieffers VJ, Hogg EH, Landhäusser SM (2004) Predicting landscape patterns of aspen dieback: mechanisms and knowledge gaps. Can J For Res 34:1379–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galiano L, Martinez-Villalta J, Lloret F (2011) Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine the recovery of Scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode. New Phytol 190:750–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galvez DA, Landhäusser SM, Tyree MT (2011) Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation? Tree Physiol 31:250–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodsman DW, Lieffers VJ, Landhäusser SM, Erbilgin N (2010) Fertilization of lodgepole pine trees increased diameter growth but reduced root carbohydrate concentrations. For Ecol Manage 260:1914–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hildahl V, Reeks WA (1960) Outbreaks of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria Hbn., and their effects on stands of trembling aspen in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Can Entomol 92:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoch G (2005) Fruit-bearing branchlets are carbon autonomous in mature broad-leaved temperate forest trees. Plant Cell Environ 28:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hogg EH (1999) Simulation of interannual responses of trembling aspen stands to climatic variation and insect defoliation in western Canada. Ecol Model 114:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hogg EH, Saugier B, Pontailler J-Y, Black TA, Chen W, Hurdle PA, Wu A (2000) Response of trembling aspen and hazelnut to vapor pressure deficit in a boreal deciduous forest. Tree Physiol 20:725–734PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hogg EH, Brandt JP, Kochtubajda B (2002) Growth and dieback of Aspen forests in northwestern Alberta, Canada, in relation to climate and insects. Can J For Res 32:823–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hogg EH, Brandt JP, Michaelin M (2008) Impacts of a regional drought on the productivity, dieback, and biomass of Canadian aspen forests. Can J For Res 38:1373–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hölttä T, Vesala T, Sevanto S, Perämäki M, Nikinmaa E (2006) Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Münch hypothesis. Trees 20:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Körner C, Asshoff R, Bignucolo O, Hättenschwiler S, Keel SG, Peláez-Riedl S, Pepin S, Siegwolf RTW, Zotzl G (2005) Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2. Science 309:1360–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kosola KR, Dickmann DI, Paul EA, Parry D (2001) Repeated insect defoliation effects on growth, nitrogen acquisition, carbohydrates, and root demography of poplars. Oecolologia 129:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kosola KR, Dickmann DI, Parry D (2002) Carbohydrates in individual poplar fine roots: effects of root age and defoliation. Tree Physiol 22:741–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landhäusser SM (2011) Aspen shoots are carbon autonomous during bud break. Trees 25:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Landhäusser SM, Lieffers VJ (1998) Growth of Populus tremuloides in association with Calamagrostis canadensis. Can J For Res 28:396–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Landhäusser SM, Lieffers VJ (2002) Leaf area renewal, root retention and carbohydrate reserves in a clonal tree species following aboveground disturbance. J Ecol 90:658–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landhäusser SM, Lieffers VJ (2003) Seasonal changes in carbohydrate reserves in mature northern Populus tremuloides clones. Trees 17:471–476Google Scholar
  34. Le Dantec V, Dufrêne E, Saugier B (2000) Interannual and spatial variation in maximum leaf area index of temperate deciduous stands. For Ecol Manage 134:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leuzinger S, Bigler C, Wolf A, Körner C (2009) Poor methodology for predicting large-scale tree die-off. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:E106 (author reply E107)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li MH, Hoch G, Körner C (2002) Source/sink removal affects mobile carbohydrates in Pinus cembra at the Swiss treeline. Trees 16:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ludovici KH, Allen HL, Albaugh TJ, Dougherty PM (2002) The influence of nutrient and water availability on carbohydrate storage in loblolly pine. For Ecol Manage 159:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Man R, Kayahara GJ, Rice JA, MacDonald GB (2008) Response of trembling aspen to partial cutting and subsequent forest tent caterpillar defoliation in a boreal mixedwood stand in northeastern Ontario, Canada. Can J For Res 38:1349–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martens L, Landhäusser SM, Lieffers VJ (2007) First-year growth response of cold-stored, nursery-grown aspen planting stock. New For 33:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinez-Vilalta J, Pinol J, Beven K (2002) A hydraulic model to predict drought-induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean. Ecol Model 155:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDowell NG (2011) Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol 155:1051–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDowell NG, Sevanto S (2010) The mechanisms of carbon starvation: how, when. Or does it even occur at all? New Phytol 186:264–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Sperry J, West A, Williams D, Yepez EA (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? Tansley review. New Phytol 178:719–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meier IC, Leuschner C (2008) Belowground drought response of European beech: fine root biomass and carbon partitioning in 14 mature stands across a precipitation gradient. Glob Change Biol 14:2081–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Michaelia M, Hogg EH, Hall RJ, Aersenault E (2010) Massive mortality of aspen following severe drought along the southern edge of the Canadian boreal forest. Glob Change Biol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02357.x
  46. Minchin PEH (2007) Mechanistic modelling of carbon partitioning. In: Vos J, Marcelis LFM, de Visser PHB, Struik PC, Evers JB (eds) Functional-structural plant modelling in crop production. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Minchin PEH, Lacointe A (2005) New understanding on phloem physiology and possible consequences for modelling long-distance carbon transport. New Phytol 166:771–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Minchin PEH, Thorpe MR (1993) Sink strength: a misnomer, and best forgotten. Plant Cell Environ 16:1039–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Newell EA, Mulkey SS, Wright SJ (2002) Seasonal patterns of carbohydrate storage in four tropical tree species. Oecologia 131:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perala DA (1990) Populus tremuloides Michx.: quaking aspen. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, Vol. 2 Hardwoods Agriculture handbook. 654, United States Department of Agriculture, pp 555–569Google Scholar
  51. Peterson EB, Peterson NM (1992) Ecology, management, and use of aspen and balsam poplar in the Prairie Provinces, Canada. Forestry Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton (Special report 1)Google Scholar
  52. Piispanen R, Saranpää P (2004) Seasonal and within-stem variations of neutral lipids in silver birch (Betula pendula) wood. Tree Physiol 24:991–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pruyn ML, Gartner BL, Harmon ME (2005) Storage versus substrate limitation to bole respiratory potential in two coniferous tree species of contrasting sapwood width. J Exp Bot 56:2637–2649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sala A, Hoch G (2009) Height-related growth declines in ponderosa pine are not due to carbon limitation. Plant Cell Environ 32:22–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sala A, Piper F, Hoch G (2010) Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytol 186:274–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanz-Pérez V, Castro-Diez P, Joffre R (2009) Seasonal carbon storage and growth in Mediterranean tree seedlings under different water conditions. Tree Physiol 29:1105–1116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sauter JJ, VanCleve B (1991) Biochemical, immunochemical, and ultrastructural studies of protein storage in poplar (Populus x canadensis robusta) wood. Planta 183:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sauter JJ, VanCleve B (1994) Storage, mobilization and interrelations of starch sugars, proteins and fat in the ray storage tissue of poplar. Trees 8:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schädel C, Blöchl A, Richter A (2009) Short-term dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates and hemicelluloses in young branches of temperate forest trees during bud break. Tree Physiol 29:901–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP (2002) Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant Cell Environ 25:251–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sprugel DG, Hinckley TM, Schaap W (1991) The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 22:309–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strand EK, Vierling LA, Bunting SC, Gessler PE (2009) Quantifying successional rates in western aspen woodlands: current conditions, future predictions. For Ecol Manage 257:1705–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tardieu F (1993) Will increases in our understanding of soil-root relations and root signalling substantially alter water flux models? Phil Trans Royal Soc Biol Sci 341:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J Exp Bot 49:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thompson MV (2006) Phloem: the long and the short of it. Trends Plant Sci 11:26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1988) Do woody-plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water-stress? Answers from a model. Plant Physiol 88:574–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1989) Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Molec Biol 40:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. van Bel AJE (2003) The phloem, a miracle of ingenuity. Plant Cell Environ 26:125–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wan X, Zwiazek JJ, Lieffers VJ, Landhäusser SM (2001) Hydraulic conductance in aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings exposed to low root temperatures. Tree Physiol 21:691–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wardlaw IF (1990) The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol 116:341–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Worrall JJ, Egeland L, Eager T, Mask RA, Johnson EW, Kemp PA, Shepperd WD (2008) Rapid mortality of Populus tremuloides in southwestern Colorado, USA. For Ecol Manage 255:686–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Worrall JJ, Marchetti SB, Egeland L, Mask RA, Eager T, Howell B (2010) Effects and etiology of sudden aspen decline in southwestern Colorado, USA. For Ecol Manage 260:638–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wright CJ (1989) Interactions between vegetative and reproductive growth. In: Wright CJ (ed) Manipulation of Fruiting. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Renewable ResourcesSchool of Forest Science and Management, University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations