Skip to main content
Log in

Aphids at crossroads: when branch architecture alters aphid infestation patterns in the apple tree

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant architecture highly constrains pest infestation but is rarely considered in studies on plant–insect interactions. We analysed the relationships between apple tree architectural traits manipulated by tree training and within-branch development of Dysaphis plantaginea (rosy apple aphid, RAA), a major apple pest, during its multiplication wingless phase in spring. We hypothesised that the degree of branching had an effect on RAA within-branch infestation. In an experimental apple orchard, the infestation by aphid wingless forms was surveyed in two consecutive spring seasons within branches manipulated to design contrasted architectures differing in shoot numbers, shoot density and branching orders. Whatever the branch management system, aphid infestation was higher on long versus short, fruiting versus vegetative, and growing versus non-growing shoots. Either less infested shoots or less severe infestation were observed in the most branched system. A pattern of within-branch short-distance infestation was confirmed. Moreover, the number of branching points between two shoots exerted a high constraint on this infestation pattern. Beside possible trophic effects due to plant growth patterns already documented in the literature, a high degree of branching is likely to be a key-architectural trait to constrain within-branch aphid infestation. This opens new perspectives on the manipulation of branch architecture as a mean giving partial control of pests towards sustainable fruit production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson P, Agrell J (2005) Within-plant variation in induced defence in developing leaves of cotton plants. Oecologia 144:427–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo APA, de Paula JD, Carneiro MAA, Schoereder JH (2006) Effects of host plant architecture on colonization by galling insects. Austral Ecol 31:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barritt BH (1992) Intensive orchard management. Good Fruit Grower. Washington State Fruit Commission, Yakima

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell A (1991) Plant form—an illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnemaison L (1959) Le puceron cendré du pommier (Dysaphis plantaginea Pass.)–Morphologie et biologie–Méthodes de lutte. Ann Epiphyt 10:257–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Grant EH, Lowe WH, Fagan WF (2007) Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. Ecol Lett 10:165–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costes E, Lauri PÉ, Regnard JL (2006) Analysing fruit tree architecture. Implication for tree management and fruit production. Hortic Rev 32:1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnélie P (1975) Théorie et méthodes statistiques, Volume 2. Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux

    Google Scholar 

  • Deberardinis E, Baronio P, Baumgartner J (1994) The effect of aphid (Dysaphis plantaginea Pass, Hom, Aphididae) feeding on apple fruit-growth. Ecol Model 72:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2006) User’s guide to SMATR: Standardised Major Axis Tests & Routines. Version 2.0. Homepage: http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/

  • Finke DL, Denno RF (2006) Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades. Oecologia 149:265–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gingras D, Boivin G (2002) Effect of plant structure, host density and foraging duration on host finding by Trichogramma evanescens (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Environ Entomol 31:1153–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grechi I, Sauge MH, Sauphanor B, Hilgert N, Senoussi R, Lescourret F (2008) How does winter pruning affect peach tree—Myzus persicae interactions? Entomol Exp Appl 128:369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grechi I, Hilgert N, Sauphanor B, Senoussi R, Lescourret F (2010) Modelling coupled peach tree-aphid population dynamics and their control by winter pruning and nitrogen fertilization. Ecol Model 221(19):2363–2373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB (1978) Tropical trees and forests. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanan J, Prunsinkiewicz P, Zalucki M, Skirvin D (2002) Simulation of insect movement with respect to plant architecture and morphogenesis. Comput Electron Agric 35:255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannunen S (2002) Vegetation architecture and redistribution of insects moving on the plant surface. Ecol Model 155:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holb IJ, Gonda I, Bitskey K (2001) Pruning and incidences of diseases and pests in environmentally oriented apple growing systems: some aspects. Int J Hortic Sci 7:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kührt U, Samietz J, Dorn S (2006) Effect of plant architecture and hail nets on temperature of codling moth habitats in apple orchards. Entomol Exp Appl 118:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langellotto GA, Denno RF (2004) Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KC, Whitham TG (1997) Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: plant architecture affects resistance to galling. Oecologia 109:575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop FH (1928) The biology of apple aphids. Ohio J Sci 28(4):177–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PÉ (2002) From tree architecture to tree training—an overview of recent concepts developed in apple in France. J Korean Soc Hortic Sci 43(6):782–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PÉ (2009) Developing a new paradigm for apple training. Compact Fruit Tree 42:17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PÉ, Laurens F (2005) Architectural types in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). In: Dris R (ed) Crops: growth, quality and biotechnology. World Food Ltd., Helsinki, pp 1300–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PÉ, Lespinasse JM (2000) The vertical axis and solaxe systems in France. Acta Hortic 513:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PÉ, Willaume M, Larrive G, Lespinasse JM (2004) The concept of centrifugal training in apple aimed at optimizing the relationship between growth and fruiting. Acta Hortic 636:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PÉ, Crété X, Ferré G (2007) Centrifugal training in apple—Appraisal of a 2 year experiment on cv. ‘Galaxy’ in southeast France. Acta Hortic 732:391–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauri PÉ, Costes E, Regnard JL, Brun L, Simon S, Monney P, Sinoquet H (2009) Does knowledge on fruit tree architecture and its implications for orchard management improve horticultural sustainability? An overview of recent advances in the apple. Acta Hortic 817:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1983) Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand A, Barbosa P (2003) Plant morphological complexity impacts foraging efficiency of adult Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ Entomol 32:1219–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lespinasse JM, Delort F (1986) Apple tree management in vertical axis: appraisal after 10 years of experiment. Acta Hortic 160:120–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani E, Wildbolz T, Riggenbach W (1995) Effect of pheromone trap position in large and small trees and in the open field on the catch of codling moth, Cydia pomonella, males. Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 68:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ (1996) Plant architecture, sectoriality and plant tolerance to herbivores. Vegetatio 127:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez JJY, Wool D (2003) Differential response of trees and shrubs to browsing and pruning: the effects on Pistacia growth and gall-inducing aphids. Plant Ecol 169:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuvonen S (1999) Random foraging by herbivores: complex patterns may be due to plant architecture. J Ecol 87:526–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians CM, Jones CG (2001) Plants as resource mosaics: a functional model for predicting patterns of within-plant resource heterogeneity to consumers based on vascular architecture and local environmental variability. Oikos 94:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parveaud CE, Gomez C, Libourel G et al (2010) Assessment of the susceptibility to pests and diseases of 36 apple cultivars in four low-input organic orchards in France. Proceedings Ecofruit 14th International Conference on Organic Fruit-Growing, Hohenheim, 22-24 February 2010 (ed. by IFOAM EU group). http://www.ecofruit.net/proceedings-2010.html (accessed on 21 April 2011)

  • Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy RJ, Wright SE, Black JL, Rull J (2001) Size of orchard trees as a factor affecting behavioural control of apple maggot flies (Dipt., Tephritidae) by traps. J Appl Entomol 125:371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randlkofer B, Obermaier E, Casas J, Meiners T (2010) Connectivity counts: disentangling effects of vegetation structure elements on the searching movement of a parasitoid. Ecol Entomol 35:446–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Riihimäki J, Vehviläinen H, Kaitaniemi P, Koricheva J (2006) Host tree architecture mediates the effect of predators on herbivore survival. Ecol Entomol 31:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon S, Lauri PÉ, Brun L, Defrance H, Sauphanor B (2006) Does manipulation of fruit-tree architecture affect the development of pests and pathogens? A case study in an organic apple orchard. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 81:765–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon S, Sauphanor B, Lauri PE (2007a) Control of fruit tree pests through manipulation of tree architecture. Pest Technol 1:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon S, Miranda C, Brun L, Defrance H, Lauri PÉ, Sauphanor B (2007b) Effect of centrifugal tree training on pests and pathogens in apple orchards. IOBC/WPRS Bull 30:237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Skirvin DJ, Fenlon J (2003) Of mites and movement: the effects of plant connectedness and temperature on movement of Phytoseiulus persimilis. Biol Control 27:242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckli S, Mody K, Dorn S (2008a) Influence of canopy aspect and height on codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larval infestation in apple, and relationship between infestation and fruit size. J Econ Entomol 101:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckli S, Mody K, Dorn S (2008b) Aphis pomi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) population development, shoot characteristics, and antibiosis resistance in different apple genotypes. J Econ Entomol 101:1341–1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim SJ (2005a) Pruning. In: Tromp J, Webster AD, Wertheim SJ (eds) Fundamentals of temperate zone tree fruit production. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 176–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim SJ (2005b) Planting systems and tree shape. In: Tromp J, Webster AD, Wertheim SJ (eds) Fundamentals of temperate zone tree fruit production. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 190–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaume M, Lauri PÉ, Sinoquet H (2004) Light interception in apple trees influenced by canopy architecture manipulation. Trees Struct Funct 18:705–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the French Ministry of Agriculture (C06-01- Pommiers; Programme 142-27, Ctps 2007-2009). We are grateful to the staff members of Gotheron experimental unit and B. Hucbourg (GRCETA Basse-Durance) for their contribution to tree training and orchard management, to J.L. Hemptinne (ENFA Toulouse) and J.L. Regnard (Supagro Montpellier) for stimulating discussions, and to David Biron for his helpful advice on the English version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvaine Simon.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Treutter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simon, S., Morel, K., Durand, E. et al. Aphids at crossroads: when branch architecture alters aphid infestation patterns in the apple tree. Trees 26, 273–282 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0629-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0629-8

Keywords