Trees

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 421–433 | Cite as

Vertical and radial profiles in tracheid characteristics along the trunk of Douglas-fir trees with implications for water transport

Original Paper

Abstract

The main stems of three young Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirbel) Franco) trees were dissected to obtain samples of secondary xylem from internodes axially along the trunk and radially within each internode. From these samples, measurements were obtained of tracheid diameter, length, the number of inter-tracheid pits per tracheid, and the diameter of the pit membranes. In addition, samples were obtained along the trunks of three old growth trees and also a small sample of roots for measurement of tracheid diameter. A gradient was apparent in all measured anatomical characters vertically along a sequence among the outer growth rings. These gradients arose not because of a gradient vertically along the internodes, but because of the strong gradients present at each internode among growth rings out from the pith. Tracheid characteristics were correlated: wider and longer tracheids had more numerous pits and wider pits, such that total pit area was about 6% of tracheid wall area independent of tracheid size. A stem model combining growth rings in parallel and internodes in series allowed for estimates of whole trunk conductance as a function of tree age. Conductance of the stem (xylem area specific conductivity) declined during the early growth of the trees, but appeared to approach a stable value as the trees aged.

Keywords

Bordered pit Conductance Resistance Tracheid anatomy Xylem 

Supplementary material

468_2011_603_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 19 kb)
468_2011_603_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (115 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 114 kb)
468_2011_603_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (127 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 126 kb)
468_2011_603_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (75 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 75 kb)

References

  1. Anfodillo T, Carraro V, Carrer M, Fior C, Rossi S (2005) Convergent tapering of xylem conduits in different woody species. New Phytol 169:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker P, Gribben RJ, Schulte PJ (2003) Incorporation of transfer resistance between tracheary elements into hydraulic resistance models for tapered conduits. Tree Physiol 23:1009–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choat B, Cobb AR, Jansen S (2008) Structure and function of bordered pits: new discoveries and impacts on whole-plant hydraulic function. New Phytol 177:608–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Domec J-C, Gartner BL (2002) How do water transport and water storage differ in coniferous earlywood and latewood? J Exp Bot 53:2369–2379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Domec J-C, Meinzer MC, Gartner BL, Woodruff D (2005) Transpiration-induced axial and radial tension gradients in trunks of Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiol 26:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domec J-C, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC (2006) Bordered pit structure and function determine spatial patterns of air-seeding thresholds in xylem of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; Pinaceae) trees. Am J Bot 93:1588–1600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domec J-C, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR, Warren JM, McCulloh KA (2008) Maximum height in a conifer is associated with conflicting requirements for xylem design. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:12069–12074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duff GH, Nolan NJ (1953) Growth and morphogenesis in the Canadian forest species. I. The controls of cambial and apical activity in Pinus resinosa Ait. Can J Bot 31:471–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dytham C (2003) Choosing and using statistics. A biologists guide. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewers FW, Zimmermann MH (1984a) The hydraulic architecture of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). Can J Bot 62:940–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ewers FW, Zimmermann MH (1984b) The hydraulic architecture of balsam fir (Abies balsamea). Physiol Plant 60:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao X, Alvo M (2008) Nonparametric multiple comparison procedures for unbalanced two-way layouts. J Stat Plan Inference 138:3674–3686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hacke UG, Sperry JS (2001) Functional and ecological xylem anatomy. Perspect Plant Ecol, Evol Syst 4:97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pittermann J (2004) Analysis of circular bordered pit function II. Gymnosperm tracheids with torus-margo pit membranes. Am J Bot 91:386–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lancashire JR, Ennos AR (2002) Modelling the hydrodynamic resistance of bordered pits. J Exp Bot 53:1485–1493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Langlois WE (1964) Slow viscous flow. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Maton C, Gartner BL (2005) Do gymnosperm needles pull water through the xylem produced in the same year as the needle? Am J Bot 92:123–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McDowell N, Barnard H, Bond BJ, Hinckley T, Hubbard RM, Ishii H, Köstner B, Magnani F, Marshall JD, Meinzer FC, Phillips N, Ryan MG, Whitehead D (2002) The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia 132:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Panshin AJ, de Zeeuw C (1980) Textbook of wood technology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Pittermann J, Sperry JS (2003) Tracheid diameter is the key trait determining the extent of freezing-induced embolism in conifers. Tree Physiol 23:907–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pittermann J, Sperry JS (2006) Analysis of freeze–thaw embolism in conifers. The interaction between cavitation pressure and tracheid size. Plant Physiol 140:374–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pittermann J, Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Wheeler JK, Sikkema EH (2005) Torus-margo pits help conifers compete with angiosperms. Science 310:1924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pittermann J, Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Wheeler JK, Sikkema EH (2006) Inter-tracheid pitting and the hydraulic efficiency of conifer wood: the role of tracheid allometry and cavitation protection. Am J Bot 93:1265–1273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pittermann J, Choat B, Jansen S, Stuart SA, Lynn L, Dawson TE (2010) The relationships between xylem safety and hydraulic efficiency in the Cuppressaceae: the evolution of pit membrane form and function. Plant Physiol 153:1919–1931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruzin SE (1999) Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheirer CJ, Ray WS, Hare N (1976) The analysis of ranked data derived from completely randomized factorial designs. Biometrics 32:429–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Siau JF (1971) Flow in wood. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
  28. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Sperry JS (2003) Evolution of water transport and xylem structure. Int J Plant Sci 164:S115–S127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sperry JS, Hacke UW, Pittermann J (2006) Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels. Am J Bot 93:1490–1500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weitz JS, Ogle K, Horn HS (2006) Ontogenetically stable hydraulic design in woody plants. Funct Ecol 20:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400:647–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. White FM (1991) Viscous fluid flow. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B (2008) Height-related trends in leaf xylem anatomy and shoot hydraulic characteristics in a tall conifer: safety versus efficiency in water transport. New Phytol 180:90–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life SciencesUniversity of NevadaLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations