Trees

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1151–1161 | Cite as

Biomechanical modeling of gravitropic response of branches: roles of asymmetric periphery growth strain versus self-weight bending effect

Original Paper

Abstract

Bending movement of a branch depends on the mutual interaction of gravitational disturbance, phototropic response, and gravitropic correction. Four factors are involved in gravitropic correction: asymmetric growth strain, eccentric growth increment, heterogeneous longitudinal elasticity (MOE), and initial radius which are associated with reaction wood production. In this context, we have developed a simplified model to calculate the rate of curvature change by combination of these factors. Experimental data from Taiwan red cypress were used to test the validity of the model. Our results show clearly that asymmetric growth strain is the main factor involved in correction. Eccentric growth increment has positive efficiency and increases correction in addition to growth strain, while the total effect of longitudinal MOE variation has negative efficiency and decreases correction. Spring-back strain measurement is found to be useful for the measurement of self-weight bending moment of branch. The branches studied are essentially close to a biomechanical equilibrium which maintains branches in horizontal positions. In the case of a deciduous dicotyledonous tree, flamegold, the effect of defoliating behavior on measured growth strain and curvature change was formulated by a modified model. Growth strain is the sum of measured growth strain after defoliation and spring-back strain during defoliation. The curvature change can be calculated by using measured growth strain and spring-back strain after defoliation. These results show that full-leaf branches of flamegold have a tendency to bend downward, but defoliated branches have a tendency for upward bending. The efficiency of correction increased after defoliation due to weight loss.

Keywords

Chamaecyparis formosensis Defoliation Koelreuteria henryi Gravitropic correction Gravitational disturbance Reaction wood 

References

  1. Alméras T, Fournier M (2009) Biomechanical design and long-term stability of trees: morphological and wood traits involved in the balance between weight increase and the gravitropic reaction. J Theoret Biol 256:370–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alméras T, Thibaut A, Gril J (2005) Effect of circumferential heterogeneity of wood maturation strain, modulus of elasticity and radial growth on the regulation of stem orientation in trees. Trees 19:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alméras T, Derycke M, Jaouen G, Beauchêne J (2009) Functional diversity in gravitropic reaction among tropical seedling in relation to ecological and developmental traits. J Exp Bot 60(15):4397–4410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer RR (1986) Growth stresses and strains in trees. Springer, New York, p 35Google Scholar
  5. Archer RR, Wilson BF (1970) Mechanics of the compression wood response: I. Preliminary analyses. Plant Physiol 46:550–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bamber RK (1978) Origin of growth stresses. Forpride Digest 8:75–90Google Scholar
  7. Bamber RK (1987) The origin of growth stresses: a rebuttal. IAWA Bull 8:80–84Google Scholar
  8. Barlow P, Brain P, Adam JS (1989) Differential growth and plant tropisms: a study assisted by computer simulation. Environ Exp Bot 29:71–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd JD (1972) Tree growth stresses. V. Evidence of an origin in differentiation and lignification. Wood Sci Technol 6:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd JD, Foster RC (1974) Tracheid anatomy changes as responses to changing structural requirements of the tree. Wood Sci Technol 8:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cosgrove DJ (1997) Cellular mechanism underlying growth asymmetry during stem gravitropism. Planta 203:130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coutand C, Fournier M, Moulia B (2007) The gravitropic response of poplar trunks: key roles of prestressed regulation and the kinetics of cambial growth versus wood maturation. Plant Physiol 114:1166–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fournier M, Bailléres H, Chanson B (1994) Tree biomechanics: growth, cumulative prestresses, and re-orientations. Biomimetics 2:229–251Google Scholar
  14. Fournier M, Stoke A, Coutand C, Fourcaud T, Moulia B (2006) Tree biomechanics and growth strategies in the context of forest functional ecology. In: Herrel A, Speck T, Rowe NP (eds) Ecology and biomechanics. Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, London, Boca Raton, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  15. Guitard D, Masse H, Yamamoto H, Okuyama T (1999) Growth stress generation: a new mechanical model of dimensional change of wood cells during maturation. J Wood Sci 45:384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang YS, Chen SS, Lin TP, Chen YS (2001) Growth stress distribution in leaning trunks of Cryptomeria japonica. Tree Physiol 21:261–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang YS, Chen SS, Kuo-Huang LL, Lee CM (2005) Growth strain in the trunk and branches of Chamaecyparis formosensis and its influence on tree form. Tree Physiol 25:1119–1126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mattheck C, Kubler H (1995) Wood: the internal optimization of trees. Springer, New York, p 129Google Scholar
  19. Niklas KJ (1992) Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 48–122Google Scholar
  20. Ohsako Y, Yamada T (1968) Growth stresses in branch of Buna-wood (Fagus crenata Blume). Wood Res 45:36–45 (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  21. Okuyama T, Kawai A, Kikata Y, Yamamoto H (1986) The growth stresses in reaction wood. In: Proceedings of 18th IUFRO world congress, Yugoslavia, Div. 5, For. Proc., pp 249–260Google Scholar
  22. Onaka F (1949) Studies on compression and tension wood. Wood research. Bull Wood Res Inst Kyoto Univ 24:1–88Google Scholar
  23. Panshin AJ, deZeeuw C, Brown HP (1964) Textbook of wood technology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 264–265Google Scholar
  24. Savidge RA, Heald JK, Wareing PF (1982) Non-uniform distribution and seasonal variation of endogenous indol-3yl-acetic acid in cambial region of Pinus contorta Dougl. Planta 155:89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Savidge RA, Mutumba GMC, Heald JK, Wareing PF (1983) Gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in compression wood vascular cambium of Pinus contorta Dougl. Plant Physiol 71:434–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Timell TE (1986a) Compression wood in gymnosperms, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 63–89Google Scholar
  27. Timell TE (1986b) Compression wood in gymnosperms, vol 3. Springer, New York, pp 1757–1791, 1799–1824Google Scholar
  28. Timoshenko S, Young DH (1962) Elements of strength of materials. Van Nostrand, Princeton, pp 111–123Google Scholar
  29. Wang Y, Gril J, Sugiyama J (2009) Variation in xylem formation of Viburnum odoratissimum var. awabuki: growth strain and related anatomical features of branches exhibiting unusual eccentric growth. Tree Physiol 29:707–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson BF, Archer RR (1977) Reaction wood: induction and mechanical action. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 28:23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yamamoto H, Okuyama T, Yoshida M, Sugiyama K (1991) Generation process of growth stresses in cell walls. III. Growth stress in compression wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37:94–100Google Scholar
  32. Yamamoto H, Yoshida M, Okuyama T (2002) Growth stress controls negative gravitropism in wood plant stems. Planta 216:280–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoshida M, Okuyama T, Yamamoto H (1992a) Tree forms and internal stresses. III. Growth stresses of branches. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:663–668Google Scholar
  34. Yoshida M, Okuyama T, Yamamoto H, Sugiyama K (1992b) Tree forms and internal stresses. II. Stresses around the base of a branch. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:657–662Google Scholar
  35. Yoshida M, Nakamura T, Yamamoto H, Okuyama T (1999) Negative gravitropism and growth stress in GA3-treated branches of Prunus spachiana Kitamura f. spachiana cv. Plenarosea. J Wood Sci 45:368–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yan-San Huang
    • 1
  • Li-Fen Hung
    • 2
  • Ling-Long Kuo-Huang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ForestryNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichungTaiwan
  2. 2.Institute of Ecology and Evolutional BiologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations