Abstract
In agroforestry systems, the effect of shade trees on coffee net photosynthesis (A n) has been the object of debates among coffee scientists. In this study, we undertook over 600 coffee A n “spot” measurements under four different artificial shade levels (100, 72, 45 and 19% of full solar irradiance) and analyzed limitations to A n by low light availability (photon flux density, PFD) and stomatal conductance (g s). These gas exchange measurements were carried out during two consecutive coffee growing seasons in a commercial plantation in the Orosi valley of Costa Rica. Levels of A n were related to PFD and g s in order to calculate envelope functions which were used to establish PFD or g s limitations to A n. Under the growing conditions of the present trial, mean leaf A n remained stable for growth irradiance (GI) as low as 45% of full sun and decreased by ~20% at 19% GI. Limitation to A n due to g s was strong in full sun and decreasing with increasing shade levels. On the other hand, limitation due to PFD remained at a similar level for all shade treatments. These different evolutions of limitations of A n by PFD and g s in response to shade explain the absence of a decrease in coffee leaf A n with a shade level up to 55%. Consequently, these results confirm that Arabica coffee is a shade-adapted plant with leaves that can maintain a high photosynthetic performance under low light availability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aranda I, Castro L, Pardos M, Gil L, Pardos JA (2005) Effects of the interaction between drought and shade on water relations, gas exchange and morphological traits in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) seedlings. For Ecol Manage 210:117–129. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.012
Araújo WL, Dias PC, Moraes GABK, Celin EF, Cunha RL, Barros RS, DaMatta FM (2008) Limitations to photosynthesis in coffee leaves from different canopy positions. Plant Physiol Biochem. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.05.005
Beer J, Muschler RG, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agrofor Syst 38:139–164. doi:10.1023/A:1005956528316
Boardman N (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28:355–377. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035
Cannell MGR (1971) Effects of fruiting, defoliation and ringbarking on the accumulation and distribution of dry matter in branches of Coffea arabica L. in Kenya. Exp Agric 7:53–74. doi:10.1017/S0014479700004798
Cannell MGR (1976) Crop physiological aspects of coffee bean yield–a review. Kenya Coffee 41:245–253
Causton D, Dale M (1990) The monomolecular and rectangular hyperbola as empirical models of the response of photosynthetic rate to photon flux density, with applications to three veronica species. Ann Bot (Lond) 65:389–394
Chaves RM, Ten-Caten A, Pinheiro HA, Ribeiro A, DaMatta FM (2008) Seasonal changes in photoprotective mechanisms of leaves from shaded and unshaded field-grown coffee (Coffea arabica L.) trees. Trees Struct Funct 22:351–361
DaMatta FM (2004) Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review. Field Crops Res 86:99–114. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.001
DaMatta FM, Ramalho JDC (2006) Impacts of drought and temperature stress on coffee physiology and production: a review. Braz J Plant Physiol 18:55–81
DaMatta FM, Ronchi CP, Maestri M, Barros RS (2007) Ecophysiology of coffee growth and production. Braz J Plant Physiol 19(4):485–510
DaMatta FM, Cunha RL, Antunes WC, Martins SCV, Araújo WL, Fernie AR, Moraes GAB (2008) In field-grown coffee trees source-sink manipulation alters photosynthetic rates, independently of carbon metabolism, via alterations in stomatal function. New Phytol 178:348–357. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02367.x
De Freitas R, De Oliveira LE, Filho N, Soares AM (2003) Influência de diferentes níveis de sombreamento no comportamento fisiológico de cultivares de café (Coffea arabica L.). Cien Agrotec Lavras 27(4):804–810
Fahl J, Carelli M, Vega J, Magalhães A (1994) Nitrogen and irradiance levels affecting net photosynthesis and growth of young coffee plants. J Hortic Sci 69:161–169
Fanjul L, Arreola R, Mendez C (1985) Stomatal responses to environmental variables in shade and sun-grown coffee plants in Mexico. Exp Agric 21:249–258. doi:10.1017/S0014479700012606
Farquhar G, von Caemmerer S, Berry J (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90. doi:10.1007/BF00386231
Franck N (2005) Effet de la charge en fruits et de l’ombrage sur l’assimilation carbonée, la croissance et la production du caféier (Coffea arabica L.). Thèse de doctorat. Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier, France, p 165
Franck N, Vaast P, Génard M, Dauzat J (2006) Soluble sugars mediate sink feedback down-regulation of leaf photosynthesis in field-grown Coffea arbica. Tree Physiol 26:517–525
Hollies M (1967) Effect of shade on the structure and chlorophyll content of arabica coffee leaves. Exp Agric 3:183–190. doi:10.1017/S001447970002202X
Jarvis P (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopys. Philos Trans R Soc B 273:539–610
Kumar D (1979) Some aspects of the physiology of Coffea arabica L. A review. Kenya Coffee 44:9–47
Larcher W (2003) Gas exchange in plants. In: Larcher W (ed) Physiological plant ecology, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–139
Leuning R (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 18:339–355. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00370.x
Niinemets Ü, Tenhunen J (1997) A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant Cell Environ 20:845–866. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-133.x
Nunes MA (1988) Environmental effects on the stomatal and mesophyll regulation of photosynthesis in coffee leaves. Photosynthetica 22:547–553
Ramalho J, Campos P, Quartin V, Silva M, Nunes MA (1999) High irradiance impairments of photosynthetic electron transport, ribulose-1, 5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and N assimilation as function of N availability in Coffea arabica L. plants. J Plant Physiol 154:319–326
Ramalho J, Pons T, Groeneveld H, Azinheira H, Nunes MA (2000) Photosynthetic acclimation to high light conditions in mature leaves of Coffea arabica L.: role of xantophylls, quenching mechanisms and nitrogen nutrition. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:43–51
Rhizopoulou S, Nunes MA (1981) Some adaptative photosynthetic characteristics of a sun plant (Ceratonia siliqua) and a shade plant (Coffea arabica). In: Margaris N, Mooney H (eds) Components of productivity of Mediterranean-climate regions. W. Junk, Den Haag, pp 85–89
Ronchi CP, DaMatta FM, Batista KD, Moraes GABK, Loureiro ME, Ducatti C (2006) Growth and photosynthetic down-regulation in Coffea arabica in response to restricting root volume. Funct Plant Biol 33:1013–1023. doi:10.1071/FP06147
Ronquim JC, Prado CHBA, Novaes P, Fahl JI, Ronquim CC (2006) Carbon gain in Coffea arabica during clear and cloudy days in the wet season. Exp Agric 42:147–164. doi:10.1017/S0014479705003121
Silva E, DaMatta FM, Ducatti C, Regazzi A, Barros R (2004) Seasonal changes in vegetative growth and photosynthesis of Arabica coffee trees. Field Crops Res 89:349–357. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.02.010
Steiman SR, Bittenbender HC, Idol TW (2007) Analysis of kaolin particle film use and its application on coffee. HortScience 42(7):1605–1608
Vaast P, Angrand J, Franck N, Dauzat J, Génard M (2005) Fruit load and branch ring-barking affect carbon allocation and photosynthesis of leaf and fruit of Coffea arabica in the field. Tree Physiol 25:753–760
Vaast P, Bertrand B, Perriot J, Guyot B, Genard M (2006) Fruit thinning and shade influence bean characteristics and beverage quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). J Sci Food Agr 86:197–204
Vaast P, van Kanten R, Siles P, Angrand J, Aguilar A (2007) Biophysical interactions between timber trees and Arabica coffee in suboptimal conditions of Central America. In: Shibu J, Gordon A (eds) Advances in agroforestry: toward agroforestry design: an ecological approach. Dordrecht, Springer, pp 135–148
van Kanten R, Vaast P (2006) Transpiration of arabica coffee and associated shade tree species in suboptimal, low-altitude conditions of Costa Rica. Agrofor Syst 67:187–202. doi:10.1007/s10457-005-3744-y
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank: Mr. Ricardo Falla from “Finca las Chúcaras” for facilitating the use and maintenance of the experimental plot in Orosi, Costa Rica; the European Commission (ICA-4-CT-2001-10071) for their financial support of scientific equipment and field measurements performed within the framework of the Central American Coffee Agroforestry project; Dr. Olivier Roupsard (CIRAD) for discussions on an early version of the manuscript, Dr. Fernando Casanoves (CATIE) for help with the statistical analysis; and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Treutter.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franck, N., Vaast, P. Limitation of coffee leaf photosynthesis by stomatal conductance and light availability under different shade levels. Trees 23, 761–769 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0318-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-009-0318-z