Abstract
Araucaria angustifolia is a critically endangered tall tree species of valuable wood, and field observations led to the suggestion that limitations imposed to the vertical growth of its tap root system greatly restrict the height of mature individuals. However, experimental studies dealing with the effects of soil depth on the species growth are mostly lacking. This study evaluated and compared the growth responses of young plants of A. angustifolia to distinct rooting depths but same soil volumes. Seeds were planted in pots of different heights and diameters, all containing 3 liters of soil mixture. Plants were submitted to four available rooting depths: 65 (T1), 35 (T2), 20 (T3), and 10 (T4) cm. There were eight experimental units in each treatment, arranged in a randomized complete block design, each block containing two units per treatment. Contrary to what was expected, the T3 and T4 plants had accumulated more mass and attained the same height as the other two groups, after a 10-month growth period in a green house. Those plants also had thicker stems, longer shoot branches, and thicker and longer lateral roots, which were interpreted as compensatory responses to increase plant anchorage and stability. The inverse relationship between rooting depth and plant mass was attributed to a down-regulation of shoot growth because or restricted lateral space and/or poor soil aeration of the longer and narrower pots. This experiment allowed us to demonstrate that is not the possibility of the tap root to grow deep into the soil that ensures a better growth to plants of A. angustifolia: provided that the offer of soil volume and resources are the same, the vertical extension of the tap root does not result in greater growth of the plants. In fact, much greater growth impairment is expected from lateral than from vertical restriction to root growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bengough AG, Croser C, Pritchard J (1997) A biophysical analysis of root growth under mechanical stress. Plant Soil 189:155–164. doi:10.1023/A:1004240706284
Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Hans J, Mckenna SJ, Roberts TJ, Valentine TA (2006) Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell. J Exp Bot 57:437–447
Boot RGA (1989) The significance of size and morphology of root systems for nutrient acquisition and competition. In: Lambers H, Cambridge ML, Konings H, Pons TL (eds) Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. SBP Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 299–311
Carvalho PER (1994) Espécies florestais brasileiras. Recomendações silviculturais, potencialidades e uso da madeira. Embrapa/CNPF, Brasília
Clark LJ, Whalley WR, Barraclough PB (2003) How do roots penetrate strong soil? Plant Soil 255:93–104. doi:10.1023/A:1026140122848
Coutts MP, Nielsen CCN, Nicoll BC (1999) The development of symmetry, rigidity and anchorage in the structural root system of conifers. Plant Soil 217:1–15. doi:10.1023/A:1004578032481
Danjon F, Fourcaud T, Bert D (2005) Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytol 168:387–400. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01497.x
Duarte LS, Dillenburg LR (2000) Ecophysiological responses of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae) seedlings to different irradiance levels. Aust J Bot 48:531–537. doi:10.1071/BT98046
Duarte LS, Dillenburg LR, Rosa LMG (2002) Assessing the role of light availability in the regeneration of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae). Aust J Bot 50:741–751. doi:10.1071/BT02027
Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005) A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant Soil 278:119–134. doi:10.1007/s11104-005-7577-2
Farjon A (2006) Araucaria angustifolia. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN 2006. Accessed 07/11/2007. http://www.iucnredlist.org
Ferreira A, Handro W (1979) Aspects of seed germination in Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. Revta brasil Bot 2:7–13
Franco MAS, Dillenburg LR (2007) Ajustes morfológicos e fisiológicos em plantas jovens de Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) Kuntze em resposta ao sombreamento. Hoehnea 34:135–144
Franco AC, Duarte HM, Gessler A, Mattos EA, Nahm M, Rennenberg H et al (2005) In situ measurements of carbon and nitrogen distribution and composition, photochemical efficiency and stable isotope ratios in Araucaria angustifolia. Trees (Berl) 19:422–430. doi:10.1007/s00468-004-0401-4
Garbin ML, Zandavalli RB, Dillenburg LR (2006) Soil patches of inorganic nitrogen in subtropical Brazilian plant communities with Araucaria angustifolia. Plant Soil 286:323–337. doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9046-y
Hoogh RJ, Dietrich AB (1979) Avaliação de sítio para Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. em povoamentos artificiais. Brasil Florestal 37:19–71
Inoue MT, Galvão F, Torres DV (1979) A produção primária de Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. no estágio de muda em dependência da intensidade luminosa. Silvicultura 4:54–56
Khuder H, Stokes A, Danjon F, Gouskou K, Lagane F (2007) Is it possible to manipulate root anchorage in young trees? Plant Soil 294:87–102. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9232-6
Misra RK, Gibbons AK (1996) Growth and morphology of eucalypt seedling-roots, in relation to soil strength arising from compaction. Plant Soil 182:1–11. doi:10.1007/BF00010990
Mósena M, Dillenburg LR (2004) Early growth of Brazilian Pine (Araucaria angustifolia [Bertol.] O. Kuntze) in response to soil compaction and drought. Plant Soil 258:293–306. doi:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016559.47135.21
Nicoll BC, Gardiner BA, Rayner B, Peace AJ (2006) Anchorage of coniferous trees in relation to species, soil type, and rooting depth. Can J Res 36:1871–1883. doi:10.1139/X06-072
Niklas KJ, Speck T (2001) Evolutionary trends in safety factors against wind-induced stem failure. Am J Bot 88:1266–1278. doi:10.2307/3558338
Paul MJ, Foyer CH (2001) Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 52:383–1400. doi:10.1093/jexbot/52.360.1383
Puchalski Â, Mantovani M, Dos Reis MS (2006) Variação em populações naturais de Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze associada a condições edafo-climáticas. Scien For 70:137–148
Reubens B, Poesen J, Danjon F, Geudens G, Muys B (2007) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees (Berl) 31:385–402. doi:10.1007/s00468-007-0132-4
Silva HD, Bellote AFJ, Ferreira CA, Bognola IA (2001) Recomendação de solos para Araucaria angustifolia com base nas suas propriedades físicas e químicas. Bol Pesq Fl 43:61–74
Singh BP, Sainju UM (1998) Soil physical and morphological properties and root growth. HortSci 35:966–971
Strojny Z, Nelson PV, Willits DH (1998) Pot soil air composition in conditions of high soil moisture and its influence on chrysanthemum growth. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 73:125–136. doi:10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00156-8
Tschaplinski TJ, Blake TJ (1985) Effects of root restriction on growth correlations, water relations and senescence of alder seedlings. Physiol Plant 64:167–176. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02331.x
Zandavalli RB, Dillenburg LR, Souza PVD (2004) Growth responses of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae) to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungus Glomus clarum. Appl Soil Ecol 25:245–255. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.09.009
Acknowledgments
We thank the Agronomy School of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul for allowing the use of their greenhouse facilities and the “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior” (CAPES/Brazil) for the fellowship awarded to the first author. This paper resulted from the master dissertation of the first author, conducted in the “Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica” of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Grams.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korndörfer, C.L., Mósena, M. & Dillenburg, L.R. Initial growth of Brazilian pine (Araucaria angustifolia) under equal soil volumes but contrasting rooting depths. Trees 22, 835–841 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0244-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0244-5