, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 759–769 | Cite as

Climate-related variability in carbon and oxygen stable isotopes among populations of Aleppo pine grown in common-garden tests

  • Jordi Voltas
  • María Regina Chambel
  • María Aránzazu Prada
  • Juan Pedro Ferrio
Original Paper


The Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) is found in the Mediterranean under a broad range of moisture and thermal conditions. Differences in severity and duration of water stress among native habitats may act as selective forces shaping the populations’ genetic make-up in terms of contrasting drought strategies. We hypothesised that these strategies should translate into intraspecific variation in carbon isotope composition (δ13C, surrogate of intrinsic water-use efficiency, WUEi) of wood holocellulose, and such variation might be linked to changes in oxygen isotope composition (δ18O, proxy of stomatal conductance) and to some climatic features at origin. Thus, we evaluated δ13C, δ18O, growth and survival for 25 Aleppo pine populations covering its geographic range and grown in two common-garden tests. We found intraspecific variability for δ13C and growth, with high-WUEi populations (which showed 18O-enriched holocellulose) having low growth. These results suggest stomatal regulation as common control for δ13C and productivity. We also detected sizeable relationships between δ13C and climate factors related to the magnitude and timing of drought such as the ratio of summer to annual rainfall. The main climate variable associated with δ18O was minimum temperature, but only in the coldest trial, suggesting differences in growth rhythms among sources. Overall, slow growing populations from highly-seasonal dry areas of the western Mediterranean exhibited a conservative water-use, as opposed to fast growing sources from the northernmost distribution range. The particular behaviour of the Mediterranean Aleppo pine as compared with other conifers demonstrates different selective roles of climate variables in determining intraspecific fitness.


Water-use efficiency Adaptation to drought Growth Pinus halepensis Mediterranean conifers 


  1. Alía R, Moro J, Denis JB (1997) Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction. Can J For Res 27:1548–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle JL (1997) Amos users’ guide; v. 3.6. Small Waters Corporation, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Atzmon N, Moshe Y, Schiller G (2004) Ecophysiological response to severe drought in Pinus halepensis Mill. trees of two provenances. Plant Ecol 171:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbour MM (2007) Stable oxygen isotope composition of plant tissue: a review. Funct Plant Biol 34:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbour MM, Walcroft AS, Farquhar GD (2002) Seasonal variation in δ13C and δ18O of cellulose from growth rings of Pinus radiata. Plant Cell Environ 25:1483–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnard RL, Salmon Y, Kodama N, Sorgel K, Holst J, Rennenberg H, Gessler A, Buchmann N (2007) Evaporative enrichment and time lags between delta O-18 of leaf water and organic pools in a pine stand. Plant Cell Environ 30:539–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boltz BA, Bongarten BC, Teskey RO (1986) Seasonal patterns of net photosynthesis of loblolly pines from diverse origins. Can J For Res 16:1063–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borghetti M, Cinnirella S, Magnani F, Saracino A (1998) Impact of long-term drought on xylem embolism and growth in Pinus halepensis Mill. Trees 12:187–195Google Scholar
  9. Calamassi R, Della Rocca G, Falusi M, Paoletti E, Strati S (2001) Resistance to water stress in seedlings of eight European provenances of Pinus halepensis Mill. Ann For Sci 58:663–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambel MR, Climent J, Alia R (2007) Divergence among species and populations of Mediterranean pines in biomass allocation of seedlings grown under two watering regimes. Ann For Sci 64:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cregg BM, Zhang JW (2001) Physiology and morphology of Pinus sylvestris seedlings from diverse sources under cyclic drought stress. For Ecol Manage 154:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortina J, Peñuelas JL, Puértolas J, Savé R, Vilagrosa A (2006) Calidad de planta forestal para la restauración de ambientes mediterráneos. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, MadridGoogle Scholar
  13. Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with WUE of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:539–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 40:503–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farquhar GD, Barbour MM, Henry BK (1998) Interpretation of oxygen isotope composition of leaf material. In: Griffiths H (ed) Stable isotopes: integration of biological, ecological and geochemical processes. BIOS Scientific, Oxford, pp 27–62Google Scholar
  16. Ferrio JP, Voltas J (2005) Carbon and oxygen isotope ratios in wood constituents of Pinus halepensis as indicators of precipitation, temperature and vapour pressure deficit. Tellus 57B:164–173Google Scholar
  17. Ferrio JP, Florit A, Vega A, Serrano L, Voltas J (2003) Δ13C and tree-ring width reflect different drought responses in Quercus ilex and Pinus halepensis. Oecologia 137:512–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gessler A, Helle G, Brandes E (2008) Carbon and oxygen isotopes—tracing the isotope signals from newly assimilated sugars in the leaves to the tree ring archive. In: Schleser GH, Helle G, Leavitt S (eds) Stable isotope dendroclimatology: physiology, systematics, chronologies and instrumentation, Springer (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Gómez A, Vendramin GG, González-Martínez SC, Alía R (2005) Genetic diversity and differentiation of two Mediterranean pines (Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinaster Ait.) along a latitudinal cline using chloroplast microsatellite markers. Divers Distrib 11:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guy RD, Holowachuk DL (2001) Population differences in stable carbon isotope ratio of Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud.: relationship to environment, climate of origin, and growth potential. Can J Bot 79:274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1982) Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 108:225–230Google Scholar
  22. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climat 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (2007) IPCC WGI Fourth Assessment Report. Summary for policymakers. Available on-line
  24. Jayawickrama KJS, McKeand SE, Jett JB (1998) Phenological variation in height and diameter growth in provenances and families of loblolly pine. New Forest 16:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein T, Hemming D, Lin TB, Grunzweig JM, Maseyk K, Rotenberg E, Yakir D (2005) Association between tree-ring and needle δ13C and leaf gas exchange in Pinus halepensis under semi-arid conditions. Oecologia 144:45–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leavitt SW, Danzer SR (1993) Method for batch processing small wood samples to holocellulose for stable-carbon isotope analysis. Anal Chem 65:87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li CC (1975) Path analysis: a primer. California Boxwood, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  28. Li C, Berninger F, Koskela J, Sonninen E (2000) Drought responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances depend on seasonality of rainfall in their place of origin. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:231–238Google Scholar
  29. Liphschitz N, Lev-Yadun S, Rosen E, Waisel Y (1984) The annual rhythm of activity of the lateral meristems (cambium and phellogen) in Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinea L. IAWA Bull 5:263–274Google Scholar
  30. Mátyás C (1996) Climatic adaptation of trees: rediscovering provenance tests. Euphytica 92:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarroll D, Loader NJ (2004) Stable isotopes in tree rings. Quatern Sci Rev 23:771–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pardos M, Climent J, Gil L, Pardos JA (2003) Shoot growth components and flowering phenology in grafted Pinus halepensis Mill. Trees 17:442–450Google Scholar
  33. Prasolova NV, Xu ZH, Farquhar GD, Saffigna PG, Dieters MJ (2001) Canopy carbon and oxygen isotope composition of 9-year-old hoop pine families in relation to seedling carbon isotope composition, growth, field growth performance, and canopy nitrogen concentration. Can J For Res 31:673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raddad EY, Luukkanen O (2006) Adaptive genetic variation in water-use efficiency and gum yield in Acacia senegal provenances grown on clay soil in the Blue Nile region, Sudan. For Ecol Manage 226:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehfeldt GE, Tchebakova NM, Parfenova YI, Wykoff WR, Kuzmina NA, Milyutin LI (2002) Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Glob Chang Biol 8:912–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sandquist DR, Ehleringer JR (2003) Carbon isotope discrimination differences within and between contrasting populations of Encelia farinosa under common-environment conditions. Oecologia 134:463–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Saurer M, Borella S, Leuenberger M (1997) δ18O of tree rings of beech (Fagus silvatica) as a record of δ18O of the growing season precipitation. Tellus 49B:80–92Google Scholar
  38. Scheidegger Y, Saurer M, Bahn M, Siegwolf R (2000) Linking stable oxygen and carbon isotopes with stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity: a conceptual model. Oecologia 125:350–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schiller G, Conkle MT, Grunwald C (1986) Local differentiation among Mediterranean populations of Aleppo pine in their isoenzymes. Silvae Genet 35:11–19Google Scholar
  40. Tognetti R, Michelozzi M, Giovannelli A (1997) Geographical variation in water relations, hydraulic architecture and terpene composition of Aleppo pine seedlings from Italian provenances. Tree Physiol 17:241–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Warren CR, Adams MA (2006) Internal conductance does not scale with photosynthetic capacity: implications for carbon isotope discrimination and the economics of water and nitrogen use in photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 29:192–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warren CR, McGrath JF, Adams MA (2001) Water availability and carbon isotope discrimination in conifers. Oecologia 127:476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warren CR, Tausz M, Adams MA (2005) Does rainfall explain variation in leaf morphology and physiology among populations of red ironbank (Eucalyptus sideroxylon subsp. tricarpa) grown in a common garden? Tree Physiol 25:1369–1378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinstein A (1989) Geographic variation and phenology of Pinus halepensis, P. brutia and P. eldarica in Israel. For Ecol Manage 27:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu ZH, Saffigna PG, Farquhar GD, Simpson JA, Haines RJ, Walker S, Osborne DO, Guinto D (2000) Carbon isotope discrimination and oxygen isotope composition in clones of the F1 hybrid between slash pine and Caribbean pine in relation to tree growth, water-use efficiency and foliar nutrient concentration. Tree Physiol 20:1209–1218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang JW, Marshall JD (1995) Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthetic gas exchange among populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus ponderosa in different environments. Funct Ecol 9:402–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang JW, Feng Z, Cregg BM, Schumann CM (1997) Carbon isotopic composition, gas exchange and growth of three populations of ponderosa pine differing in drought tolerance. Tree Physiol 17:461–466PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordi Voltas
    • 1
  • María Regina Chambel
    • 2
  • María Aránzazu Prada
    • 3
  • Juan Pedro Ferrio
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Forest SciencesUniversity of LleidaLleidaSpain
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)MadridSpain
  3. 3.Banc de Llavors ForestalsDirección General de Gestión del Medio NaturalValenciaSpain
  4. 4.Chair of Tree PhysiologyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburg im BreisgauGermany

Personalised recommendations