Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 680–694 | Cite as

Testing a method for reconstructing structural development of even-aged Abies sachalinensis stands

  • Akira OsawaEmail author
  • Nahoko Kurachi
  • Yojiro Matsuura
  • Mayuko Jomura
  • Yoichi Kanazawa
  • Masaru Sanada
Original Article

Abstract

Accuracy of a stand reconstruction technique was examined by comparing the estimated values of the aboveground biomass, total stem volume, stem volume growth, and stand density of Abies sachalinensis stands to those observed between 1980 and 1998 in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Census data from two stands established in 1973, one fertilized and the other unfertilized, were used for the examination. The stand statistics in the past were estimated from the DBH and height of individual trees measured in 1998, data on the aboveground biomass and stem volume with bark for nine living trees of various sizes harvested in each plot in 1998 or in 1999, and data from the stem analysis of the same harvested trees. We showed that the reconstructed patterns of the frequency distribution in aboveground biomass and in stem volume were generally the same as those observed in both plots and in any year in the past (except for 1982 and/or 1980), and that the reproduced patterns of stand development over time were similar to those observed directly in the past. Accuracy in predicting stand statistics was generally in the order of ±10% relative error. We consider that the present method of stand reconstruction could be used to estimate aboveground biomass, total stem volume, and stem volume growth of a stand in the past. Interpretation of results for the early years (1982 and 1980) and for the stand density requires caution.

Keywords

Abies sachalinensis Aboveground biomass Size distribution Stand reconstruction Stand structure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Reiko Otomo and Etsuko Sanada for contribution to the fertilization experiment at Hitsujigaoka Experimental Forest, and Michael Furmanovsky and two anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments to the manuscript. Hiromi Abe and Hatena Osawa provided field assistance. This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research C1-12640623 and B1-13440232 from Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

References

  1. Aplet GH, Smith FW, Laven RD (1989) Stemwood biomass and production during spruce-fir stand development. J Ecol 77:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arney JD (1974) An individual tree model for stand simulation in Douglas fir. In: Fries J (ed) Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Res Notes 30. Department of Forest Yield Research, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, pp 38–46Google Scholar
  3. Bella IE (1971) A new competition model for individual trees. For Sci 17:364–372Google Scholar
  4. Botkin DB, Janak JF, Wallis JR (1972) Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J Ecol 60:948–972Google Scholar
  5. Busing RT (1991) A spatial model of forest dynamics. Vegetatio 92:167–179Google Scholar
  6. Clatterbuck WK, Hodges JD (1988) Development of cherry-bark oak and sweet gum in mixed, even-aged bottomland stands in central Mississippi, U.S.A. Can J For Res 18:12–18Google Scholar
  7. Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Friend AD, Shugart HH, Running SW (1993) A physiology-based gap model of forest dynamics. Ecology 74:792–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fulton M (1991) A computationally efficient forest succession model: Design and initial tests. For Ecol Manage 42:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry JD, Swan JMA (1974) Reconstructing forest history from live and dead plant material—an approach to the study of forest succession in Southwest New Hampshire. Ecology 55:772–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hozumi K (1971) Studies on the frequency distribution of the weight of individual trees in a forest stand III. A beta-type distribution. Jpn J Ecol 21:152–167Google Scholar
  12. Hozumi K (1975) Studies on the frequency distribution of the weight of individual trees in a forest stand V. The M-w diagram for various types of forest stands. Jpn J Ecol 25:123–131Google Scholar
  13. Hozumi K, Shinozaki K, Tadaki Y (1968) Studies on the frequency distribution of the weight of individual trees in a forest stand I. A new approach toward the analysis of the distribution function and the -3/2th power distribution. Jpn J Ecol 18:10–20Google Scholar
  14. Ito A, Oikawa T (2002) A simulation model of the carbon cycle in land ecosystems (Sim-CYCLE): A description based on dry-matter production theory and plot-scale validation. Ecol Model 151:147–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jomura M (1999) Dry matter production and growth analysis of Abies sachalinensis plantations. BS thesis, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. LaBarbera M (1989) Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee Y (1967) Stand models for lodgepole pine and limits to their application. For Chron 43:387–388Google Scholar
  18. Marks PL (1974) The role of pin cherry (Prunus pensylcanica L.) in the maintenance of stability in northern hardwood ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 44:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell KJ (1969) Simulation of growth of even-aged stands of white spruce. Yale Univ Sch For Bull 75:1–48Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell KJ (1975) Dynamics and simulated yield of Douglas-fir. For Sci Monogr 17:1–39Google Scholar
  21. Mori M, Osumi K (1991) Growth analysis of 88 year-old Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) plantations in Akita Prefecture, north-eastern Japan. Bull For For Prod Res Inst 361:1–15Google Scholar
  22. Oliver CD (1978) Development of northern red oak in mixed species forest in central New England. Yale Univ Sch For Environ Stud, Bull 91Google Scholar
  23. Oliver CD, Stephens EP (1977) Reconstruction of a mixed species forest in central New England. Ecology 58:562–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Osawa A, Abaimov AP (2001) Feasibility of estimating stem size distribution from measurement on the largest trees in even-aged pure stands. Can J For Res 31:910–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Osawa A, Ishizuka M, Kanazawa Y (1991) A profile theory of tree growth. For Ecol Manage 41:33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Osawa A, Abaimov AP, Zyryanova OA (2000) Reconstructing structural development of even-aged larch stands in Siberia. Can J For Res 30:580–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osawa A, Abaimov AP, Kajimoto T (2001) Feasibility of estimating total stem volume and aboveground biomass from measurement on the largest trees in even-aged pure stands. Can J For Res 31:2042–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pacala SW, Canham CD, Silander JA Jr (1993) Forest models defined by field measurements: I. The design of a northeastern forest simulator. Can J For Res 23:1980–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J Biogeogr 19:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanada M, Otomo R, Sanada E (1995) Tree growth and nutrient concentration of current needles in a fertilized Abies sachalinensis stand—Changes in needle nutrient concentration during 17 years at a fertilizer application experiment plot. Trans Jpn For Soc 106:223–224Google Scholar
  31. Schulze E-D, Schulze W, Kelliher FM, Vygodskaya NN, Ziegler W, Kobak KI, Koch H, Arneth A, Kusnetsova WA, Sogatchev A, Issajev A, Bauer G, Hollinger DY (1995) Aboveground biomass and nitrogen nutrition in a chronosequence of prestine Dahurian Larix stands in eastern Siberia. Can J For Res 25:943–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shugart HH (1984) A theory of forest dynamics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Shugart HH, West DC (1980) Forest succession models. BioScience 30:308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith TM, Shugart HH (1996) The application of patch models in global change research. In: Walker B, Steffen W (eds) Global change and terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  36. Sprugel DG (1983) Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64:209–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spurr SH, Young LJ, Barnes BV, Hughes EL (1957) Nine successive thinnings in a Michigan white pine plantation. Forestry 55:7–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Osawa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nahoko Kurachi
    • 2
  • Yojiro Matsuura
    • 3
  • Mayuko Jomura
    • 4
  • Yoichi Kanazawa
    • 4
  • Masaru Sanada
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Intercultural CommunicationRyukoku UniversityOhtsuJapan
  2. 2.Hiraoka Forest InstituteOhtsuJapan
  3. 3.Forestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Natural SciencesKobe UniversityKobeJapan
  5. 5.Hokkaido Research CenterForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteSapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations