Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilizing increased risk for disease transmission (IRD) kidneys for pediatric renal transplant recipients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Strategies to expand numbers of deceased donor kidneys suitable for pediatric recipients are urgently needed to prevent long-term dialysis-associated morbidity and mortality. Donors designated as increased risk of disease transmission (IRD) are infrequently used in pediatric recipients. We examined outcomes of these kidneys in pediatric patients and the potential to increase the donor pool.

Methods

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database records presence of IRD in all deceased donors since 2004. All pediatric kidney transplant recipients from 2004 to 2017 were identified and stratified by IRD status, and outcomes were examined.

Results

Four hundred seventy-three pediatric kidney transplant recipients received an IRD allograft. IRD donors had lower kidney donor profile index (KDPI); were more likely to be younger, male, and Caucasian; and were more likely to have used drugs. IRD kidneys were more likely to have been biopsied and placed on pulsatile perfusion. Other than an older recipient age, demographic data were not different between groups. Allograft and patient survivals were similar, as were rejection and delayed graft function rates. Compared with adult recipients and adult IRD recipients, pediatric recipients were more likely to have a younger donor, receive a kidney with a lower creatinine, and were less likely to have delayed graft function (p < 0.05). There were no recorded disease transmissions in IRD group.

Conclusions

Patient and allograft survivals are similar in IRD and non-IRD kidneys. High-quality IRD organs used in adults represent a large number of donors with excellent outcomes. IRD allografts have a potential to increase transplant volume and should be considered for pediatric patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Gustafson SK, Wilk AR, Robinson A, Wainright JL, Haynes CR, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK (2018) OPTN/SRTR 2016 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant 18(Suppl 1):18–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Seem DL, Lee I, Umscheid CA, Kuehnert MJ, United States Public Health Service (2013) PHS guideline for reducing human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus transmission through organ transplantation. Public Health Rep 128:247–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491312800403

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Public comment proposal: guidance on explaining risk related to use of U.S. PHS increased risk donor organs when considering organ offers. OPTN/UNOS Ad-hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee

  4. Kucirka LM, Singer AL, Segev DL (2011) High infectious risk donors: what are the risks and when are they too high? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 16:256–261. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283449dd3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wrenn SM, Callas PW, Kapoor T, Aunchman AF, Paine AN, Pineda JA, Marroquin CE (2017) Increased risk organ transplantation in the pediatric population. Pediatr Transplant 21(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrison AK, Gowda C, Tumin D, Phelps CM, Hayes D Jr, Tobias J, Gajarski RJ, Nandi D (2018) Pediatric marginal donor hearts: trends in US national use, 2005-2014. Pediatr Transplant 22:e13216. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan AM, Green RS, Lytrivi ID, Sahulee R (2016) Donor predictors of allograft utilization for pediatric heart transplantation. Transpl Int 29:1269–1275. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahulee R, Lytrivi ID, Savla JJ, Rossano JW (2014) Centers for Disease Control “high-risk” donor status does not significantly affect recipient outcome after heart transplantation in children. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:1173–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2014.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kucirka LM, Ros RL, Subramanian AK, Montgomery RA, Segev DL (2011) Provider response to a rare but highly publicized transmission of HIV through solid organ transplantation. Arch Surg 146:41–45. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Irwin L, Kotton CN, Elias N, Palafox J, Basler D, Shao SH, Lester W, Zhang X, Kimball B, Trencher C, Fishman JA (2017) Utilization of increased risk for transmission of infectious disease donor organs in solid organ transplantation: retrospective analysis of disease transmission and safety. Transpl Infect Dis 19(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsiouris A, Wilson L, Sekar RB, Mangi AA, Yun JJ (2016) Heart transplant outcomes in recipients of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) high risk donors. J Card Surg 31:772–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaffey AC, Doll SL, Thomasson AM, Venkataraman C, Chen CW, Goldberg LR, Blumberg EA, Acker MA, Stone F, Atluri P (2016) Transplantation of “high-risk” donor hearts: implications for infection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang CS, Levea SL, Parekh JR, Liang Y, Desai DM, MacConmara M (2019) Should more donation after cardiac death livers be used in pediatric transplantation? Pediatr Transplant 23:e13323. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duan KI, Englesbe MJ, Volk ML (2010) Centers for Disease Control ‘high-risk’ donors and kidney utilization. Am J Transplant 10:416–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02931.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Christine S. Hwang: first author, gathered, organized, and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Jyothsna Gattineni: participated in reviewing the manuscript.

Malcolm MacConmara: participated in gathering, organizing, and performing data analysis and writing the manuscript.

All authors have approved the manuscript as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine S. Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The data reported here were supplied by the Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation as the contractor for the SRTR. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way, should be an official policy of or interpretation by the SRTR or the US government.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, C.S., Gattineni, J. & MacConmara, M. Utilizing increased risk for disease transmission (IRD) kidneys for pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 34, 1743–1751 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-019-04276-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-019-04276-w

Keywords

Navigation