Skip to main content

Nationwide conversion to generic tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Abstract

Background

Bioequivalence between Tacrolimus Prograf® and generic tacrolimus formulations has been demonstrated in adult populations, however clinical experience and safety data regarding generic tacrolimus in pediatric transplant recipients is limited. This study aimed to evaluate conversion from Tacrolimus Prograf® to Sandoz® in pediatric renal transplant recipients nationwide. The primary outcome was a change in mean trough tacrolimus concentration. Additionally, changes in tacrolimus intra-patient coefficient of variation (CoV), allograft function, requirement for dose adjustments, and episodes of biopsy-proven rejection were evaluated.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study in 37 pediatric renal transplant recipients who switched to Tacrolimus Sandoz®. Each patient had three pre-conversion tacrolimus trough and creatinine concentrations within the 4 months prior and three post-conversion concentrations on day 3, 10, and the next subsequent level. Mean pre- and post-conversion tacrolimus trough concentrations and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were calculated. Tacrolimus concentration, CoV, and creatinine differences were compared by paired t test.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (41% females, age 3–18 years) were included. Average intra-patient difference in trough tacrolimus concentration was 0.05μg/l (95% CI –0.37 to 0.47). Average intra-patient difference in eGFR was −1.20 ml/min/1.732 (95% CI –3.53 to 1.13). Three patients had acute rejection during 12 months post-conversion compared to none during 12 months pre-conversion.

Conclusions

Pediatric renal transplant recipients can be converted from Tacrolimus Prograf® to Sandoz® with negligible change in trough concentration, dose adjustments, or immediate allograft function. Of concern was the number of acute rejection episodes, however non-adherence contributed to at least one episode and this difference was determined clinically and statistically not significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2009) Clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 9(Suppl 3):S1–S157

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alloway RR, Isaacs R, Lake K, Hoyer P, First R, Helderman H, Bunnapradist S, Leichtman A, William Bennett MW, Tejani A, Takemoto SK (2003) Report of the American Society of Transplantation conference on immunosuppressive drugs and the use of generic immunosuppressants. Am J Transplant 3:1211–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allard J, Fortin MC (2014) Is it ethical to prescribe generic immunosuppressive drugs to renal transplant patients? Can J Kidney Health Dis 1:23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Molnar AO, Fergusson D, Tsampalieros AK, Bennett A, Fergusson N, Ramsay T, Knoll GA (2015) Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 350:h3163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Marfo K, Aitken S, Akalin E (2013) Clinical outcomes after conversion from brand-name tacrolimus (Prograf) to a generic formulation in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study. PT 38:484–488

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taube D, Jones G, O'Beirne J, Wennberg L, Connor A, Rasmussen A, Backman L (2014) Generic tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation. Clin Transpl 28:623–632

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mansukhani GP, Conway J (2015) Generic immunosuppression: should we be worried? Pediatr Transplant 19:818–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdulnour HA, Araya CE, Dharnidharka VR (2010) Comparison of generic tacrolimus and Prograf drug levels in a pediatric kidney transplant program: brief communication. Pediatr Transplant 14:1007–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davit BM, Nwakama PE, Buehler GI (2009) Comparing generic and innovator drugs: a review of 12 years of bioequivalence data from the United States Food and Drug Administration. Ann Pharmacother 43:1583–1597

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenborg S, Nordström A, Almquist T, Wennberg L, Bárány P (2014) Systematic conversion to generic tacrolimus in stable kidney transplant recipients. Clin Kidney J 7:151–155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2010/01/WC500070039.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2016

  12. Alloway RR, Sadaka B, Trofe-Clark J, Wiland A, Blood RD (2012) A randomized pharmacokinetic study of generic tacrolimus versus reference tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 13:2825–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. PHARMAC consultation (2014) Proposal of sole supply for tacrolimus, pp 1–7 https://www.pharmac.govt.nz/assets/consultation-2014-01-30-tacrolimus.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec

  14. Schwartz GJ, Muñoz A, Schneider MF, Mak RH, Kaskel F, Warady BA, Furth SL (2009) New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:629–637

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pappas DE The common cold in children: clinical features and diagnosis. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/the-common-cold-in-children-clinical-features-and-diagnosis. Sept 2015 last updated, Accessed 3 Dec 2016

  16. McDevitt-Potter LM, Sadaka B, Tichy EM, Rogers CC, Gabardi S (2011) A multicenter experience with generic tacrolimus conversion. Transplantation 92:653–657

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Momper JD, Ridenour TA, Schonder KS, Shapiro R, Humar A, Venkataramanan R (2011) The impact of conversion from Prograf to generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function. Am J Transplant 11:1861–1867

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Duong SQ, Lal AK, Joshi R, Feingold B, Venkataramanan R (2015) Transition from brand to generic tacrolimus is associated with a decrease in trough blood concentration in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 19:911–917

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Meredith Foster.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derisha Naicker.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Auckland District Health Board ethics committee. No funding was obtained for this study.

Support and financial disclosure declaration

No funding source was required for the preparation of this work.

The authors have no financial or ethical conflicts of interest as relate to this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naicker, D., Reed, P.W., Ronaldson, J. et al. Nationwide conversion to generic tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 32, 2125–2131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-017-3707-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-017-3707-3

Keywords

  • Calcineurin inhibitor
  • Generic
  • Immunosuppression
  • Renal
  • Tacrolimus
  • Transplantation