Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of placebo on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been proposed as a useful tool for more accurately diagnosing hypertension (HTN) and evaluating blood pressure (BP) response in pediatric anti-hypertensive trials. ABPM captures multiple BP measurements during routine daily activities and is thus an excellent method for identifying white-coat HTN. Additionally, ABPM measurements in adults do not demonstrate the placebo effect commonly seen with casual BP measurements, although this has yet to be evaluated in children. Therefore,, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of placebo on ABPM measurements in children.

Methods

A total of 141 children aged 5–16 years with elevated BP were randomized into a multi-center, single-blind, cross-over trial. Subjects received a placebo pill prior to wearing a 24-h ABPM device at one of two visits separated by 1–2 weeks. Study procedures were otherwise identical at both visits.

Results

Mean systolic and diastolic BP for all measured time periods were similar between visits, as was the number of children diagnosed with HTN at each visit.

Conclusion

Having confirmed HTN at baseline did not affect the impact of placebo on mean BP. If confirmed, this lack of placebo effect on ABPM measurements may allow for the design of direct comparison pediatric anti-hypertensive trials without a placebo arm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABPM:

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

BP:

Blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

HTN:

Hypertension

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

References

  1. Antal M, Regoly-Merei A, Nagy K, Greiner E, Biro L, Domonkos A, Balajti A, Szorad I, Szabo C, Mozsary E (2004) Representative study for the evaluation of age- and gender-specific anthropometric parameters and blood pressure in an adolescent Hungarian population. Ann Nutr Metab 48:307–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Genovesi S, Giussani M, Pieruzzi F, Vigorita F, Arcovio C, Cavuto S, Stella A (2005) Results of blood pressure screening in a population of school-aged children in the province of Milan: role of overweight. J Hypertens 23:493–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kardas P, Kufelnicka M, Herczynski D (2005) Prevalence of arterial hypertension in children aged 9–14 years, residents of the city of Lodz. Kardiol Pol 62:211–216, discussion 216–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McNiece KL, Poffenbarger TS, Turner JL, Franco KD, Sorof JM, Portman RJ (2007) Prevalence of hypertension and pre-hypertension among adolescents. J Pediatr 150:640–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saleh EA, Mahfouz AA, Tayel KY, Naguib MK, Bin-Al-Shaikh NM (2000) Hypertension and its determinants among primary-school children in Kuwait: an epidemiological study. East Mediterr Health J 6:333–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorof JM, Lai D, Turner J, Poffenbarger T, Portman RJ (2004) Overweight, ethnicity, and the prevalence of hypertension in school-aged children. Pediatrics 113:475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Acosta AA, Samuels JA, Portman RJ, Redwine KM (2012) Prevalence of persistent pre-hypertension in adolescents. J Pediatr 160:757–761

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith PB, Li JS, Murphy MD, Califf RM, Benjamin DK Jr (2008) Safety of placebo controls in pediatric hypertension trials. Hypertension 51:829–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flynn JT (2003) Ethics of placebo use in pediatric clinical trials: the case of antihypertensive drug studies. Hypertension 42:865–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuoka S, Kawamura K, Honda M, Awazu M (2002) White coat effect and white coat hypertension in pediatric patients. Pediatr Nephrol 17:950–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorof JM, Portman RJ (2000) White coat hypertension in children with elevated casual blood pressure. J Pediatr 137:493–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stabouli S, Kotsis V, Toumanidis S, Papamichael C, Constantopoulos A, Zakopoulos N (2005) White-coat and masked hypertension in children: association with target-organ damage. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1151–1155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sorof JM, Urbina EM, Cunningham RJ, Hogg RJ, Moxey-Mims M, Eissa MA, Rolf C (2001) Screening for eligibility in the study of antihypertensive medication in children: experience from the Ziac Pediatric Hypertension Study. Am J Hypertens 14:783–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ (2005) Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 45:142–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. [No authors listed](1996) Update on the 1987 task force report on high blood pressure in children and adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on hypertension control in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 98:649–658

  16. Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children (1987) Report of the second task force on blood pressure control in children—1987. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Pediatrics 79:1–25

  17. Urbina E, Alpert B, Flynn J, Hayman L, Harshfield GA, Jacobson M, Mahoney L, McCrindle B, Mietus-Snyder M, Steinberger J, Daniels S (2008) Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents: recommendations for standard assessment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee of the council on cardiovascular disease in the young and the council for high blood pressure research. Hypertension 52:433–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hadtstein C, Wuhl E, Soergel M, Witte K, Schaefer F (2004) Normative values for circadian and ultradian cardiovascular rhythms in childhood. Hypertension 43:547–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mancia G, Omboni S, Parati G, Ravogli A, Villani A, Zanchetti A (1995) Lack of placebo effect on ambulatory blood pressure. Am J Hypertens 8:311–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Preston RA, Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Williams DW (2000) Placebo-associated blood pressure response and adverse effects in the treatment of hypertension: observations from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. Arch Intern Med 160:1449–1454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Punzi H, Neutel JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shojaee A, Waverczak WF, Dubiel R, Maa JF (2010) Efficacy of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension: the AZOR Trial Evaluating Blood Pressure Reductions and Control (AZTEC) study. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 4:209–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Neutel JM, Littlejohn TW, Chrysant SG, Singh A (2005) Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in comparison with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in managing patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Hypertens Res 28:555–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams B, Lacourciere Y, Schumacher H, Gosse P, Neutel JM (2009) Antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan vs ramipril over the 24-h dosing period, including the critical early morning hours: a pooled analysis of the PRISMA I and II randomized trials. J Hum Hypertens 23:610–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gimpel C, Wuhl E, Arbeiter K, Drozdz D, Trivelli A, Charbit M, Gellermann J, Dusek J, Jankauskiene A, Emre S, Schaefer F (2009) Superior consistency of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: implications for clinical trials. J Hypertens 27:1568–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanigawara Y, Yoshihara K, Kuramoto K, Arakawa K (2009) Comparative pharmacodynamics of olmesartan and azelnidipine in patients with hypertension: a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 24:376–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan IA, Gajaria M, Stephens D, Balfe JW (2000) Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children: a large center’s experience. Pediatr Nephrol 14:802–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lurbe E, Cremades B, Rodriguez C, Torro MI, Alvarez V, Redon J (1999) Factors related to quality of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a pediatric population. Am J Hypertens 12:929–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Sources of funding

The Network of Pediatric Pharmacology Research Units is funded by the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (5U10HD031324-152; 3U10 HD 021324-15S12; 5U10 HD 031323-154; U10 HD0459345; U10 HD0459866)

K.R. is funded in part by the UAMS Translational Research Institute KL2 scholars program (KL2RR029883), the Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, and the Arkansas Biosciences Institute, the major research component of the Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act of 2000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Redwine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Redwine, K., Howard, L., Simpson, P. et al. Effect of placebo on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children. Pediatr Nephrol 27, 1937–1942 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2191-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2191-z

Keywords

Navigation