Skip to main content
Log in

Screening high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in young infants with a febrile urinary tract infection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The lack of good evidence for improved outcomes in children and young infants with febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) after aggressive treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has raised doubts regarding the need for routine voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), and the appropriate imaging evaluation in these children remains controversial.

Objectives

This prospective study aimed to determine whether abnormalities found on acute dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan and ultrasound (US) can help indicate the necessity of voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in young infants.

Methods

For 3.5 years, all infants younger than 3 months presenting with first febrile UTI were prospectively studied. All infants were hospitalized and investigated using US (<3 days after admission), DMSA scan (<5 days after admission), and VCUG (7–10 days after antibiotic treatment) after diagnosis. The association among findings of US, DMSA scan, and VCUG were evaluated.

Results

From 220 infants, there were abnormal results in 136 (61.8%) US and in 111 (50.5%) DMSA scans. By US, ten infants (4.5%) with abscess or structural abnormalities other than VUR were diagnosed. High-grade (III–V) VUR was present in 39 patients (17.7%). The sensitivities for high-grade VUR of renal US alone (76.9%) or DMSA scan alone (82.1%) were not as good as that of the “OR rule” strategy, which had 92.3% sensitivity and 94.3% negative predictive value.

Conclusions

To screen high-grade VUR in young infants with febrile UTI, US and acute DMSA scan could be performed first. VCUG is only indicated when abnormalities are apparent on either US or DMSA scan or both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marks SD, Gordon I, Tullus K (2008) Imaging in childhood urinary tract infections: time to reduce investigations. Pediatr Nephrol 23:9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong SN, Tse NK, Lee KP, Yuen SF, Leung LC, Pau BC, Chan WK, Lee KW, Cheung HM, Chim S, Yip CM (2010) Evaluating different imaging strategies in children after first febrile urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol 25:2083–2091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang HG, Lee BH, Choi Y (2009) UTI in infancy: are voiding cystourethrography and prophylactic antibiotics necessary? Pediatr Nephrol 24:1599–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Preda I, Jodal U, Sixt R, Stokland E, Hansson S (2011) Imaging strategy for infants with urinary tract infection: a new algorithm. J Urol 185(3):1046–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Montini G, Hewitt I (2009) Urinary tract infections: to prophylaxis or not to prophylaxis? Pediatr Nephrol 24:1605–1609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters CA, Skoog SJ, Arant BS Jr, Copp HL, Elder JS, Hudson RG, Khoury AE, Lorenzo AJ, Pohl HG, Shapiro E, Snodgrass WT, Diaz M (2010) Summary of the AUA Guideline on Management of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. J Urol 184:1134–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Academy of Pediatrics, Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection, Committee on Quality Improvement and Management. (2011) Urinary tract infection: Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and young children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics 128:595-610

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. (2007) Urinary Tract Infection in Children: Diagnosis, Treatment and Long-term Management. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Clinical Guideline. London, United Kingdom: RCOG Press

  9. Hansson S, Dhamey M, Sigstrom O, Sixt R, Stokland E, Wennerstrom M, Jodal U (2004) Dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy instead of voiding cystourethrography for infants with urinary tract infection. J Urol 172:1071–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Preda I, Jodal U, Sixt R, Stokland E, Hansson S (2007) Normal dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy makes voiding cystourethrography unnecessary after urinary tract infection. J Pediatr 151:581–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tseng MH, Lin WJ, Lo WT, Wang SR, Chu ML, Wang CC (2007) Does a normal DMSA obviate the performance of voiding cystourethrography in evaluation of young children after their first urinary tract infection? J Pediatr 150:96–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siomou E, Giapros V, Fotopoulos A, Assioti M, Papadopoulou A, Andronikao S (2009) Implications of 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy performed during urinary tract infection in neonates. Pediatrics 124:881–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MD, Lin CC, Huang FY, Tsai TC, Huang CT, Tsai JD (2009) Screening young children with a first febrile urinary tract infection for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux with renal ultrasound scanning and technetium-99m-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid scanning. J Pediatr 154:797–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee HY, Soh BH, Hong CH, Kim MJ, Han SW (2009) The efficacy of ultrasound and dimercaptosuccinic acid scan in predicting vesicoureteral reflux in children below the age of 2 years with their first febrile urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol 24:2009–2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fouzas S, Krikelli E, Vassilakos P, Gkentzi D, Papanastasiou DA, Salakos C (2010) DMSA scan for revealing vesicoureteral reflux in young children with urinary tract infection. Pediatrics 126:e513–e519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quirino IG, Silva JM, Diniz JS Rocha AC, Silva AC Simões E, Oliveira EA (2011) Combined use of late phase dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scintigraphy and ultrasound as first line screening after urinary tract infection in children. J Urol 185:258–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson NG, Allan RB, Abbott GD (2004) Fluctuating fetal or neonatal renal pelvis: marker of high-grade vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 19:749–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alton DJ, LeQuesne GW, Gent R, Siegmann JW, Byard R (1992) Sonographically demonstrated thickening of the pelvis in children. Pediatr Radiol 22:426–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jequier S, Rousseau O (1987) Sonographic measurements of the normal bladder wall in children. Am J Roentgenol 149:563–566

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Avni EF, Ayadi K, Rypens F, Hall M, Schulman CC (1997) Can careful ultrasound examination of the urinary tract exclude vesicoureteric reflux in the neonate? Br J Radiol 70:977–982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vujic A, Kosutic J, Bogdanovic R, Prijic S, Milicic B, Igrutinovic Z (2007) Sonographic assessment of normal kidney dimensions in the first year of life - a study of 992 healthy infants. Pediatr Nephrol 22:1143–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen HT, Herndon A, Cooper C, Gatti J, Kirsch A, Kokorowski P, Lee R, Perez-Brayfield M, Metcalfe P, Yerkes E, Cendron M, Campbell JB (2010) The society for fetal urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 6:212–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piepsz A, Ham HR (2006) Pediatric applications of renal nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 36:16–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weinstein S, Obuchowski NA, Lieber ML (2005) Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests. Am J Roentgenol 184:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jaksic E, Bogdanovic R, Artiko V, Saranovic DS, Petrasinovic Z, Petrovic M, Bojic L, Pavlovic S, Paripovic A, Antonovic O, Lezaic VD, Saranovic D, Petrovic N, Obradovic V (2011) Diagnostic role of initial renal cortical scintigraphy in children with the first episode of acute pyelonephritis. Ann Nucl Med 25:37–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mantadakis E, Vouloumanou EK, Georgantzi GG, Tsalkidis A, Chatzimichael A, Falagas ME (2011) Acute Tc-99m DMSA scan for identifying dilating vesicoureteral reflux in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 128:e1–e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stokland E, Hellstrom M, Jacobsson B, Jodal U, Lundgren P, Sixt R (1996) Early 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy in symptomatic first-time urinary tract infection. Acta Paediatr 85:430–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Preda I, Jodal U, Sixt R, Stokland E, Hansson S (2010) Value of ultrasound in evaluation of infants with first urinary tract infection. J Urol 183:1984–1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoberman A, Charron M, Hickey RW, Baskin M, Kearney DH, Wald ER (2003) Imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children. N Engl J Med 3489:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Giorgi LJ Jr, Bratslavsky G, Kogan BA (2005) Febrile urinary tract infections in infants: renal ultrasound remains necessary. J Urol 173:568–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pohl HG, Belman AB (2009) The “top-down” approach to the evaluation of children with febrile urinary tract infection. Adv Urol 78:3409–3413

    Google Scholar 

  32. Flyn JT (2009) Don’t stop performing voiding cystourethrography in young children after the initial febrile urinary tract infection-at least not yet. J Pediatr 155:761

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest related to the investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Chen Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, JD., Huang, CT., Lin, PY. et al. Screening high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in young infants with a febrile urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol 27, 955–963 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2104-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2104-1

Keywords

Navigation