Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of fluid overload and dose of replacement fluid on survival in hemofiltration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is used to treat renal failure in children. Despite widespread use of the technique, little research has evaluated how variations in dose of replacement fluid or degree of fluid overload at initiation relate to outcomes. We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with convective CRRT at our institution, using a multivariable Cox regression model. Children with high fluid overload (>10%) at CRRT initiation were at 3.02 times greater risk of mortality than those with low or no fluid overload [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50–6.10, P =0.002]. The hazard ratio for death in children treated with high-dose convective clearance was not statistically significant. Our data support previous findings that volume overload in excess of 10% is strongly correlated with poor outcome. We favor early institution of CRRT, before excessive fluid overload occurs. In contrast to findings in adults, we find no advantage to higher rates of convective clearance. Given the risks and increased complexity associated with high-volume hemofiltration, we recommend further study prior to widespread adoption of high-level convection in children treated with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ronco C, Ricci Z, Bellomo R (2001) Importance of increased ultrafiltration volume and impact on mortality: sepsis and cytokine story and the role of continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 10:755–761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, Brendolan A, Dan M, Piccinni P, La Greca G (2000) Effects of different doses in continuous veno-veno hemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomized trial. Lancet 356:26–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouman CSC, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Tijssen JGP, Zandstra DF, Kesecioglu J (2002) Effects of early high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: a prospective, randomized trial. Crit Care Med 30:2205–2211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein SL, Currier H, Graf JM, Cosio CC, Brewer ED, Sachdeva R (2001) Outcome in children receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Pediatrics 107:1309–1312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein SL, Somers MJG, Symons JM, McAfee N, Bunchman TE, Barnett J, Gregory M, Mottes T, Brophy PD, Feig DI (2002) The first report of the multi-center prospective pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy registry (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 13:244A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR (1988) Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med 16:1110–1116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by a National Research Service Award from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health. The authors gratefully acknowledge Nancy Hawkins McAfee, RN, BSN, CNN, for extensive assistance in data collection and management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert S. Gillespie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillespie, R.S., Seidel, K. & Symons, J.M. Effect of fluid overload and dose of replacement fluid on survival in hemofiltration. Pediatr Nephrol 19, 1394–1399 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1655-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1655-1

Keywords

Navigation