Skip to main content
Log in

Single-dose daily administration of cyclosporin A for relapsing nephrotic syndrome

  • Brief report
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cyclosporin A (CsA) has been reported to be effective as a steroid-sparing agent in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS). However, low efficacy has sometimes been observed in selected patients with steroid-dependent FRNS. We speculated that a low peak level of CsA in the blood might be the cause, and conducted a prospective pilot study on such steroid-dependent FRNS patients to examine whether single-dose daily administration of CsA would yield a sufficient peak blood level, and therefore a satisfactory steroid-sparing effect. Five children with steroid-dependent FRNS, aged 7–16 years, were enrolled in the study. All had been treated with prednisolone combined with twice daily CsA (T), which was subsequently replaced with the single-dose daily administration protocol (S), because of a poor steroid-sparing effect. Although the mean daily CsA dosage with the S protocol was significantly lower than with the T protocol (S 2.4±1.1 mg/kg per day vs. T 3.6±0.8 mg/kg per day, P<0.05), the mean peak blood level tended to be higher with the S protocol than the T protocol (S 764±122 ng/ml vs. T 358±250 ng/ml, P=0.1797) without mean trough blood level elevation. As a result, the minimum dose of prednisolone required for maintenance of clinical remission tended to be lower with the S than the T protocol (S 0.4±0.2 mg/kg on alternate days vs. T 0.6±0.4 mg/kg on alternate days, P=0.0656). No evidence of CsA nephrotoxicity was observed in a repeat renal biopsy performed 9 months after commencement of the S protocol in one patient. These clinical observations, although on a small number of patients and preliminary, suggest that single-dose daily administration of CsA might be an attractive protocol in selected patients with steroid-dependent FRNS in whom CsA administration by the conventional protocol is associated with a poor steroid-sparing effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Tarshish P, Tobin JN, Bernstein J, Edelmann CM Jr (1997) Prognostic significance of the early course of minimal change nephrotic syndrome: report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:769–776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hulton SA, Neuhaus TJ, Dillon MJ, Barratt TM (1994) Long-term cyclosporine A treatment of minimal-change nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Pediatr Nephrol 8:401–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gregory MJ, Smoyer WE, Sedman A, Kershaw DB, Valentini RP, Johnson K, Bunchman TE (1996) Long-term cyclosporine therapy for pediatric nephrotic syndrome: a clinical and histologic analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:543–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hino S, Takemura T, Okada M, Murakami K, Yagi K, Fukushima K, Yoshioka K (1998) Follow-up study of children with nephrotic syndrome treated with a long-term moderate dose of cyclosporine. Am J Kidney Dis 31:932–939

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kano K, Kyo K, Yamada Y, Ito S, Ando T, Arisaka O (1999) Comparison between pre- and posttreatment clinical and renal biopsies in children receiving low dose ciclosporine-A for 2 years for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Clin Nephrol 52:19–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma R, Kumar J, Ahmed M, Gupta A, Gulati S, Sharma AP, Bhandari M (2001) Cyclosporine level: which point estimation of drug level is the best? Transplant Proc 33:3124–3125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Citterio F, Scata MC, Borzi MT, Pozzetto U, Castagneto M (2001) C2 single-point sampling to evaluate cyclosporine exposure in long-term renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 33:3133–3136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosati A, Bertoni E, Zanazzi M, Maria LD, Ciuti R, Piperno R, Moscarelli L, Biagini M, Salvadoei M (2001) Neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine 2-hour postdose levels (C2) in different renal transplant patient age group. Transplant Proc 33:3106–3107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chishti AS, Sorof JM, Brewer ED, Kale AS (2001) Long-term treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children with cyclosporine given as a single daily dose. Am J Kidney Dis 38:754–760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka H, Onodera N, Waga S (1999) Long-term azathioprine therapy in two children with steroid-dependent minimal-change nephrotic syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med 187:273–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue Y, Iijima K, Nakamura H, Yoshikawa N (1999) Two-year cyclosporin treatment in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 13:33–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iijima K, Hamahira K, Tanaka R, Kobayashi A, Nozu K, Nakamura H, Yoshikawa N (2002) Risk factors for cyclosporine-induced tubulointerstitial lesions in children with minimal change nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int 61:1801–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Tanaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, H., Nakahata, T. & Ito, E. Single-dose daily administration of cyclosporin A for relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 19, 1055–1058 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1508-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1508-y

Keywords

Navigation