Abstract
Standard non-local gradient damage methodology for fatigue analysis has an intrinsic drawback of unusual widening of the damage zone. This causes a rapid growth of crack in the simulations which often violate experimental evidences. In order to tackle this undesirable behaviour, the localizing gradient damage methodology has been formulated for high cycle fatigue crack growth simulations. The framework comprises of coupling damage and elasticity through continuum mechanics, a fatigue damage law and an interaction function which reduces the influence of damaged regions on the surrounding locality. The present scheme prevents the spurious widening of the damage-band around the critically damaged area and therefore the non-physical growth of fatigue crack in the simulations is successfully countered. The developed framework is tested on various standard specimens under mode-I and mixed-mode high cycle fatigue loads. Nonlinear finite element analysis is used for this purpose. The discretized form of solver equations for the localizing framework is mathematically derived. Numerical examples show that the simulated crack-growth curves using proposed localizing framework agree closely with the experimental data and has a higher accuracy than the standard non-local framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Paris P, Erdogan F (1963) A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. ASME J Basic Eng 85(4):528–533. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656900
Forman RG, Kearney VE, Engle RM (1967) Numerical analysis of crack propagation in cyclic-loaded structures. ASME J Basic Eng 89(3):459–463. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3609637
Walker EK (1970) An effective strain concept for crack propagation and fatigue life with specific applications to biaxial stress fatigue. In: Proceeding of air force conference on fatigue and fracture of aircraft structures and materials, Report AAFFDL–TR–70–144, pp 25–233
McEvily AJ, Groeger J (1978) On the threshold for fatigue crack growth. Adv Res Strength Fract Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-022140-3.50087-2
Tanaka K (1974) Fatigue crack propagation from a crack inclined to the cyclic tensile axis. Eng Fract Mech 6(3):493–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(74)90007-1
Hussain MA, Pu SL, Underwood J (1974) Strain energy release rate for a crack under combined mode I and mode. Fract Anal 560(1)
Richard HA (1984) Some theoretical and experimental aspects of mixed mode fractures. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on fracture, New Delhi, India, pp 3337–3344. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-8440-8.50358-6
Yan X, Du S, Zhang Z (1992) Mixed-mode fatigue crack growth prediction in biaxially stretched sheets. Eng Fract Mech 43(3):471–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(92)90115-U
Plank R, Kuhn G (1999) Fatigue crack propagation under non-proportional mixed mode loading. Eng Fract Mech 62(2–3):203–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00097-6
Dahlin P, Olsson M (2004) Reduction of mode I fatigue crack growth rate due to occasional mode II loading. Int J Fatigue 26(10):1083–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.003
Borrego LP, Antunes FV, Costa JM, Ferreira JM (2006) Mixed-mode fatigue crack growth behaviour in aluminium alloy. Int J Fatigue 28(5–6):618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.047
Chen Q, Guo H, Avery K, Kang H, Su X (2018) Mixed-mode fatigue crack growth and life prediction of an automotive adhesive bonding system. Eng Fract Mech 189:439–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.004
Demir O, Ayhan AO, İriç S (2017) A new specimen for mixed mode-I/II fracture tests: modeling, experiments and criteria development. Eng Fract Mech 178:457–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.02.019
Demir O, Ayhan AO, Sedat IRIC, Lekesiz H (2018) Evaluation of mixed mode-I/II criteria for fatigue crack propagation using experiments and modeling. Chin J Aeronaut 31(7):1525–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2018.05.009
Floros D, Ekberg A, Larsson F (2019) Evaluation of crack growth direction criteria on mixed-mode fatigue crack growth experiments. Int J Fatigue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.013
Miranda ACO, Meggiolaro MA, Castro JTP, Martha LF (2007) Path and life predictions under mixed mode I-Mode II complex loading. In International symposium on solid mechanics. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Qian J, Fatemi A (1996) Fatigue crack growth under mixed-mode I and II loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19(10):1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00950.x
Richard HA, Sander M, Fulland M, Kullmer G (2008) Development of fatigue crack growth in real structures. Eng Fract Mech 75(3–4):331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.017
Richard HA, Schramm B, Schirmeisen NH (2014) Cracks on mixed mode loading–theories, experiments, simulations. Int J Fatigue 62:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.019
Sajith S, Krishna Murthy KSR, Robi PS (2019) Prediction of accurate mixed mode fatigue crack growth curves using the Paris’ law. J Inst Eng (India) Ser C 100:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-017-0418-2
Sajith S, Murthy KSRK, Robi PS (2020) Experimental and numerical investigation of mixed mode fatigue crack growth models in aluminum 6061-T6. Int J Fatigue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105285
Sander M, Richard HA (2006) Experimental and numerical investigations on the influence of the loading direction on the fatigue crack growth. Int J Fatigue 28(5–6):583–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.012
Shukla SS, Murthy KSRK (2023) A study on the effect of different Paris constants in mixed mode (I/II) fatigue life prediction in Al 7075–T6 alloy. Int J Fatigue 176:107895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107895
Shukla SS, Sajith S, Murthy KSRK (2022) A new simple specimen for mixed-mode (I/II) fracture and fatigue tests: numerical and experimental studies. Eur J Mech A Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104566
Varfolomeev I, Burdack M, Moroz S, Siegele D, Kadau K (2014) Fatigue crack growth rates and paths in two planar specimens under mixed mode loading. Int J Fatigue 58:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.013
Ayhan AO, Demir O (2021) Computational modeling of three-dimensional mixed mode-I/II/III fatigue crack growth problems and experiments. Comput Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106399
Shukla SS, Murthy KSRK, Sajith S (2023) Mixed mode (I/III) fracture studies using a new specimen setup. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.108036
Kumar M, Ahmad S, Singh IV, Rao AV, Kumar J, Kumar V (2018) Experimental and numerical studies to estimate fatigue crack growth behavior of Ni-based super alloy. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 96:604–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.07.002
Kumar M, Bhuwal AS, Singh IV, Mishra BK, Ahmad S, Rao AV, Kumar V (2017) Nonlinear fatigue crack growth simulations using J-integral decomposition and XFEM. Procedia Eng 173:1209–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.126
Kumar M, Singh IV, Mishra BK (2019) Fatigue crack growth simulations of plastically graded materials using XFEM and J-integral decomposition approach. Eng Fract Mech 216:106470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.002
Singh IV, Mishra BK, Bhattacharya S, Patil RU (2012) The numerical simulation of fatigue crack growth using extended finite element method. Int J Fatigue 36(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.010
Chaboche JL (1981) Continuous damage mechanics—a tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation. Nucl Eng Des 64(2):233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(81)90007-8
Lemaitre J (1986) Local approach of fracture. Eng Fract Mech 25(5–6):523–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(86)90021-4
Pijaudier-Cabot G, Bažant ZP (1987) Nonlocal damage theory. J Eng Mech 113(10):1512–1533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512)
Qian Z, Takezono S, Tao K (1996) A nonlocal damage mechanics approach to high temperature fatigue crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 53(4):535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(95)00156-5
Lemaitre J, Doghri I (1994) Damage 90: a post processor for crack initiation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 115(3–4):197–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(94)90060-4
Lemaitre J (1996) A course on damage mechanics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering damage mechanics: ductile, creep, fatigue and brittle failures. Springer, Berlin
Chaboche JL (2008) A review of some plasticity and viscoplasticity constitutive theories. Int J Plast 24(10):1642–1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.03.009
Wahab MA, Ashcroft IA, Crocombe AD, Shaw SJ (2001) Prediction of fatigue thresholds in adhesively bonded joints using damage mechanics and fracture mechanics. J Adhes Sci Technol 15(7):763–781. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610152540830
Shenoy V, Ashcroft IA, Critchlow GW, Crocombe AD (2010) Fracture mechanics and damage mechanics based fatigue lifetime prediction of adhesively bonded joints subjected to variable amplitude fatigue. Eng Fract Mech 77(7):1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.008
Ashcroft IA, Shenoy V, Critchlow GW, Crocombe AD (2010) A comparison of the prediction of fatigue damage and crack growth in adhesively bonded joints using fracture mechanics and damage mechanics progressive damage methods. J Adhes 86(12):1203–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2010.529383
Van Do VN, Lee CH, Chang KH (2015) High cycle fatigue analysis in presence of residual stresses by using a continuum damage mechanics model. Int J Fatigue 70:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.013
Lee CH, Chang KH, Van Do VN (2016) Modeling the high cycle fatigue behavior of T-joint fillet welds considering weld-induced residual stresses based on continuum damage mechanics. Eng Struct 125:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.002
Jiang W, Xie X, Wang T, Zhang X, Tu ST, Wang J, Zhao X (2021) Fatigue life prediction of 316L stainless steel weld joint including the role of residual stress and its evolution: Experimental and modelling. Int J Fatigue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105997
Wang X, Bian Z, Zhang Z, Hu W, Meng Q (2022) Fatigue life prediction for Al–Zn–Mg alloy butt welded joints based on a fatigue damage model accounting for the influence of interior porosity. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13932
Yuan D, Cui C, Zhang Q, Li Z, Ye Z (2022) Fatigue damage evaluation of welded joints in steel bridge based on meso-damage mechanics. Int J Fatigue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106898
Pandey VB, Samant SS, Singh IV, Mishra BK (2020) An improved methodology based on continuum damage mechanics and stress triaxiality to capture the constraint effect during fatigue crack propagation. Int J Fatigue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105823
Pandey VB, Singh IV, Mishra BK, Ahmad S, Rao AV, Kumar V (2019) A new framework based on continuum damage mechanics and XFEM for high cycle fatigue crack growth simulations. Eng Fract Mech 206:172–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.021
Sharma D, Pandey VB, Singh IV, Natarajan S, Kumar J, Ahmad S (2021) A polygonal FEM and continuum damage mechanics based framework for stochastic simulation of fatigue life scatter in duplex microstructure titanium alloys. Mech Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104071
Sharma D, Singh IV, Kumar J (2022) A microstructure based elasto-plastic polygonal FEM and CDM approach to evaluate LCF life in titanium alloys. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107356
Sharma D, Singh IV, Kumar J (2023) A computational framework based on 3D microstructure modelling to predict the mechanical behaviour of polycrystalline materials. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108565
Peerlings RH, de Borst R, Brekelmans WM, de Vree J (1996) Gradient enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39(19):3391–3403. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19%3c3391::AID-NME7%3e3.0.CO;2-D
Aifantis EC (1984) On the microstructural origin of certain inelastic models. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 106:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3225725
Lasry D, Belytschko T (1988) Localization limiters in transient problems. Int J Solids Struct 24(6):581–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(88)90059-5
de Borst R, Mühlhaus HB (1992) Gradient-dependent plasticity: formulation and algorithmic aspects. Int J Numer Meth Eng 35(3):521–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620350307
Peerlings RH, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Geers MG (1998) Gradient-enhanced damage modelling of concrete fracture. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 3(4):323–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(1998100)3:4%3c323::AID-CFM51%3e3.0.CO;2-Z
Geers MGD, De Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Peerlings R (1998) Strain-based transient-gradient damage model for failure analyses. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 160(1–2):133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80011-X
Geers MGD, De Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, Peerlings RHJ (1999) Validation and internal length scale determination for a gradient damage model: application to short glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene. Int J Solids Struct 36(17):2557–2583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00123-1
Peerlings RH (1999) Enhanced damage modelling for fracture and fatigue. [Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e), Mechanical Engineering]. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR520108
Peerlings RH, Brekelmans WM, de Borst R, Geers MG (2000) Gradient-enhanced damage modelling of high-cycle fatigue. Int J Numer Meth Eng 49(12):1547–1569. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0207(20001230)49:12%3c1547::AID-NME16%3e3.0.CO;2-D
Nguyen GD (2011) A damage model with evolving nonlocal interactions. Int J Solids Struct 48(10):1544–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.02.002
Saroukhani S, Vafadari R, Simone A (2013) A simplified implementation of a gradient-enhanced damage model with transient length scale effects. Comput Mech 51:899–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0769-8
Poh LH, Sun G (2017) Localizing gradient damage model with decreasing interactions. Int J Numer Meth Eng 110(6):503–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5364
Sarkar S, Singh IV, Mishra BK (2022) A localizing gradient plasticity model for ductile fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 388:114205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114205
Sarkar S, Singh IV, Mishra BK, Shedbale AS, Poh LH (2019) A comparative study and ABAQUS implementation of conventional and localizing gradient enhanced damage models. Finite Elem Anal Des 160:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2019.04.001
Sarkar S, Singh IV, Mishra BK (2020) A thermo-mechanical gradient enhanced damage method for fracture. Comput Mech 66:1399–1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01908-z
Sarkar S, Singh IV, Mishra BK (2022) A simple and efficient implementation of localizing gradient damage method in COMSOL for fracture simulation. Eng Fract Mech 269:108552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108552
Sarkar S, Singh IV, Mishra BK (2021) A simplified continuous–discontinuous approach to fracture based on decoupled localizing gradient damage method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 383:113893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113893
Negi A, Kumar S (2019) Localizing gradient damage model with smoothed stress based anisotropic nonlocal interactions. Eng Fract Mech 214:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.04.011
Negi A, Kumar S, Poh LH (2020) A localizing gradient damage enhancement with micromorphic stress-based anisotropic nonlocal interactions. Int J Numer Meth Eng 121(18):4003–4027. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6397
Nguyen TH, Bui TQ, Hirose S (2018) Smoothing gradient damage model with evolving anisotropic nonlocal interactions tailored to low-order finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 328:498–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.09.019
Vandoren B, Simone A (2018) Modeling and simulation of quasi-brittle failure with continuous anisotropic stress-based gradient-enhanced damage models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 332:644–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.027
Negi A, Singh U, Kumar S (2021) Structural size effect in concrete using a micromorphic stress-based localizing gradient damage model. Eng Fract Mech 243:107511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107511
Negi A, Soni A, Kumar S (2022) An anisotropic localizing gradient damage approach for failure analysis of fiber reinforced composites. Compos Struct 294:115677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115677
Negi A, Singh IV, Barsoum I (2023) A gradient-enhanced damage model for anisotropic brittle fracture with interfacial damage in polycrystalline materials. Eng Fract Mech 280:109093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109093
Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46(8):1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9
Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015) A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. Comput Mech 55:383–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y
Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57(8):1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011
Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91:5–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9107-3
Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–2778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011
Wu JY (2017) A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure. J Mech Phys Solids 103:72–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015
de Borst R, Verhoosel CV (2016) Gradient damage vs phase-field approaches for fracture: similarities and differences. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.05.015
Boldrini JL, de Moraes EB, Chiarelli LR, Fumes FG, Bittencourt M (2016) A non-isothermal thermodynamically consistent phase field framework for structural damage and fatigue. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:395–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.08.030
Alessi R, Vidoli S, De Lorenzis L (2018) A phenomenological approach to fatigue with a variational phase-field model: the one-dimensional case. Eng Fract Mech 190:53–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.036
Carrara P, Ambati M, Alessi R, De Lorenzis L (2020) A framework to model the fatigue behavior of brittle materials based on a variational phase-field approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 361:112731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112731
Schreiber C, Kuhn C, Müller R, Zohdi T (2020) A phase field modeling approach of cyclic fatigue crack growth. Int J Fract 225:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00468-w
Loew PJ, Peters B, Beex LA (2020) Fatigue phase-field damage modeling of rubber using viscous dissipation: crack nucleation and propagation. Mech Mater 142:103282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103282
Hasan MM, Baxevanis T (2021) A phase-field model for low-cycle fatigue of brittle materials. Int J Fatigue 150:106297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106297
Seleš K, Aldakheel F, Tonković Z, Sorić J, Wriggers P (2021) A general phase-field model for fatigue failure in brittle and ductile solids. Comput Mech 67:1431–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-01996-5
Golahmar A, Niordson CF, Martínez-Pañeda E (2023) A phase field model for high-cycle fatigue: total-life analysis. Int J Fatigue 170:107558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107558
Jaccon A, Prabel B, Molnár G, Bluthé J, Gravouil A (2023) Adaptive mesh refinement and cycle jumps for phase-field fatigue fracture modeling. Finite Elem Anal Des 224:104004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2023.104004
Mandal TK, Nguyen VP, Heidarpour A (2019) Phase field and gradient enhanced damage models for quasi-brittle failure: a numerical comparative study. Eng Fract Mech 207:48–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.013
Suresh S (1998) Fatigue of materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bathe KJ, Cimento AP (1980) Some practical procedures for the solution of nonlinear finite element equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 22(1):59–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(80)90051-1
Negru R, Marsavina L, Muntean S, Pasca N (2013) Fatigue behaviour of stainless steel used for turbine runners. Adv Eng Forum 8:413–420. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.8-9.413
Stephens RI (1988) Fatigue and fracture toughness of A356-T6 cast aluminum alloy, society of automotive engineers. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, vol SP-760, p 15096
Tajiri A, Uematsu Y, Kakiuchi T, Suzuki Y (2015) Fatigue crack paths and properties in A356–T6 aluminum alloy microstructurally modified by friction stir processing under different conditions. Fratt Integr Strutt. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.34.38
Chopra OK (2002) Development of a fatigue design curve for austenitic stainless steels in LWR environments: a review. In: ASME Pressure vessels and piping conference, vol 46504, pp 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2002-1229
Benachour M, Hadjoui A, Benguediab M, Benachour N (2010) Effect of the amplitude loading on fatigue crack growth. Procedia Eng 2(1):121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.013
Mazlan S, Yidris N, Koloor SSR, Petrů M (2020) Experimental and numerical analysis of fatigue life of aluminum Al 2024–T351 at elevated temperature. Metals 10(12):1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10121581
Kumar R, Garg SBL (1985) Influence of applied stress ratio on fatigue crack growth in 6063-T6 aluminium alloy. Int J Press Vessels Pip 20(1):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(85)90035-3
Tomaszewski T, Sempruch J (2017) Fatigue life prediction of aluminium profiles for mechanical engineering. J Theor Appl Mech 55(2):497–507. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.55.2.497
Acknowledgements
This present work was carried out as a part of the doctoral research work of Mr. Sandipan Baruah under the fellowship of the Ministry of Education, Government of India. We gratefully acknowledge the computational support provided by the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SB: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing-Original Draft. IVS: Resources, Writing-Review and Editing, Supervision, Project administration.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Linearization of damage
At a particular load-step (n + 1), the damage at the end of iterations i and i + 1 are given below in Eqs. (48) and (49) respectively.
Subtracting, Eqs. (48) from Eq. (49),
By applying first term of Taylor’s series expansion on f,
Also, the linearization of non-local strain (e),
Substituting Eqs. (51) and (52) in (50) and neglecting the product of infinitesimal terms,
At any gauss point, the incremental non-local strain (δe) can be written using linear shape functions Se and the nodal vector of non-local strain (δe) as,
Substituting Eq. (54) into (53) and rearranging the terms, the linearized damage is obtained as shown below,
where the expression of p(i) is given as,
Appendix 2: Linearization of moment stress
At a particular load-step (n + 1) and at a particular iteration (i), the moment stress is given as
By applying first term of Taylor’s series expansion on εm,
Furthermore,
Substituting Eqs. (59, 60, 61, 62) and (55) into (58), the linearized moment stress is obtained as shown below,
where the expression of q(i) is given as,
Appendix 3: Derivatives of equivalent strain
The equivalent Von-Mises strain is given as,
where J2ε is the second invariant of the deviatoric strain tensor which is given below for plane stress condition.
The derivatives of equivalent strain are given as,
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Baruah, S., Singh, I.V. A numerical framework based on localizing gradient damage methodology for high cycle fatigue crack growth simulations. Comput Mech 74, 417–446 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02439-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02439-z