Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Space–time isogeometric analysis of car and tire aerodynamics with road contact and tire deformation and rotation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a space–time (ST) isogeometric analysis framework for car and tire aerodynamics with road contact and tire deformation and rotation. The geometries of the computational models for the car body and tires are close to the actual geometries. The computational challenges include i) the complexities of these geometries, ii) the tire rotation, iii) maintaining accurate representation of the boundary layers near the tire while being able to deal with the flow-domain topology change created by the road contact, iv) the turbulent nature of the flow, v) the aerodynamic interaction between the car body and the tires, and vi) NURBS mesh generation for the complex geometries. The computational framework is made of the ST Variational Multiscale (ST-VMS) method, ST Slip Interface (ST-SI) and ST Topology Change (ST-TC) methods, ST Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA), integrated combinations of these ST methods, NURBS Surface-to-Volume Guided Mesh Generation (NSVGMG) method, and the element-based mesh relaxation (EBMR). The ST context provides higher-order accuracy in general, the VMS feature of the ST-VMS addresses the challenge created by the turbulent nature of the flow, and the moving-mesh feature of the ST context enables high-resolution flow computation near the moving fluid–solid interfaces. The ST-SI enables moving-mesh computation with the tire rotating. The mesh covering the tire rotates with it, and the SI between the rotating mesh and the rest of the mesh accurately connects the two sides of the solution. The ST-TC enables moving-mesh computation even with the TC created by the contact between the tire and the road. It deals with the contact while maintaining high-resolution flow representation near the tire. Integration of the ST-SI and ST-TC enables high-resolution representation even though parts of the SI are coinciding with the tire and road surfaces. It also enables dealing with the tire–road contact location change and contact sliding. By integrating the ST-IGA with the ST-SI and ST-TC, in addition to having a more accurate representation of the tire geometry and increased accuracy in the flow solution, the element density in the tire grooves and in the narrow spaces near the contact areas is kept at a reasonable level. The NSVGMG enables NURBS mesh generation for the complex car and tire geometries, and the EBMR improves the quality of the meshes. The car and tire aerodynamics computation we present shows the effectiveness of the analysis framework we have built.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2011) Multiscale space–time fluid–structure interaction techniques. Comput Mech 48:247–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0571-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time fluid–structure interaction methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22(supp02):1230001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512300013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kuraishi T (2015) Multiscale ST methods for thermo-fluid analysis of a ground vehicle and its tires. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25:2227–2255. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400072

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Mochizuki H, Hattori H, Mei S, Pan L, Montel K (2015) Space–time VMS method for flow computations with slip interfaces (ST-SI). Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25:2377–2406. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400126

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kuraishi T, Tabata S, Takagi H (2016) Computational thermo-fluid analysis of a disk brake. Comput Mech 57:965–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1272-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014) Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC). Comput Mech 54:955–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0935-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2014) Space–time fluid mechanics computation of heart valve models. Comput Mech 54:973–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1046-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time computational techniques for the aerodynamics of flapping wings. J Appl Mech 79:010903. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005073

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Otoguro Y, Terahara T, Kuraishi T, Hattori H (2017) Turbocharger flow computations with the space–time isogeometric analysis (ST-IGA). Comput Fluids 142:15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.02.021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Terahara T, Sasaki T (2018) Heart valve flow computation with the space–time slip interface topology change (ST-SI-TC) method and isogeometric analysis (IGA). In: Wriggers P, Lenarz T (eds) Biomedical technology: modeling, experiments and simulation. Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59548-1_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Terahara T, Sasaki T (2017) Heart valve flow computation with the integrated space–time VMS, slip interface, topology change and isogeometric discretization methods. Comput Fluids 158:176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.11.012

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Tire aerodynamics with actual tire geometry, road contact and tire deformation. Comput Mech 63:1165–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1642-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boben J, Kostov N, Boswell C, Buscher A (2013) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 52:1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0880-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Space–time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact, tire deformation, road roughness and fluid film. Comput Mech 64:1699–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01746-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70153-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tezduyar TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43:555–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.505

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1430

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes TJR (1995) Multiscale phenomena: Green’s functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles, and the origins of stabilized methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 127:387–401

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes TJR, Oberai AA, Mazzei L (2001) Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method. Phys Fluids 13:1784–1799

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:173–201

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bazilevs Y, Akkerman I (2010) Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor–Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual-based variational multiscale method. J Comput Phys 229:3402–3414

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9071-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, Boboken. ISBN 978-0470978771

  27. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Computational analysis methods for complex unsteady flow problems. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 29:825–838. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202519020020

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00204-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics. Comput Fluids 36:12–26

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2012) Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: validation and role of weakly enforced boundary conditions. Comput Mech 50:499–511

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2008) NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components. Comput Mech 43:143–150

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech 50:821–833

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Moghadam ME, Bazilevs Y, Hsia T-Y, Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL, of Congenital Hearts Alliance (MOCHA) M (2011) A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations. Comput Mech 48:277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0599-0

  34. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:236–253

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2011) High-performance computing of wind turbine aerodynamics using isogeometric analysis. Comput Fluids 49:93–100

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Korobenko A, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Tippmann J, Bazilevs Y (2013) Structural mechanics modeling and FSI simulation of wind turbines. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:249–272

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Korobenko A, Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) Recent advances in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS computational aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid–structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty—2018. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 253–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Otoguro Y, Mochizuki H, Wu MCH (2020) Wind turbine and turbomachinery computational analysis with the ALE and space–time variational multiscale methods and isogeometric discretization. J Adv Eng Comput 4:1–32. https://doi.org/10.25073/jaec.202041.278

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Otoguro Y, Mochizuki H, Wu MCH (2020) ALE and space–time variational multiscale isogeometric analysis of wind turbines and turbomachinery. In: Grama A, Sameh A (eds) Parallel algorithms in computational science and engineering. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43736-7_7

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Ravensbergen M, Bayram AM, Korobenko A (2020) The actuator line method for wind turbine modelling applied in a variational multiscale framework. Comput Fluids 201:104465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104465

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Bayram AM, Bear C, Bear M, Korobenko A (2020) Performance analysis of two vertical-axis hydrokinetic turbines using variational multiscale method. Comput Fluids 200:104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104432

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Yan J, Korobenko A, Deng X, Bazilevs Y (2016) Computational free-surface fluid–structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines. Comput Fluids 141:155–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.03.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A, Yan J, Pal A, Gohari SMI, Sarkar S (2015) ALE-VMS formulation for stratified turbulent incompressible flows with applications. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 25:2349–2375. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Korobenko A (2020) Computational flow analysis in aerospace, energy and transportation technologies with the variational multiscale methods. J Adv Eng Comput 4:83–117. https://doi.org/10.25073/jaec.202042.279

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Korobenko A (2020) Variational multiscale flow analysis in aerospace, energy and transportation technologies. In: Grama A, Sameh A (eds) Parallel algorithms in computational science and engineering. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43736-7_8

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A, Deng X, Yan J (2016) FSI modeling for fatigue-damage prediction in full-scale wind-turbine blades. J Appl Mech 83(6):061010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Kvamsdal T, Hentschel S, Isaksen J (2010) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:481–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid–structure interaction simulations. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:593–599

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Long CC, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y (2013) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices. Comput Mech 52:971–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0858-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Hsu M-C, Kamensky D, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2014) Fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation. Comput Mech 54:1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1059-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Kamensky D, Hsu M-C, Schillinger D, Evans JA, Aggarwal A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2015) An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid–structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 284:1005–1053

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C (2019) Computational cardiovascular flow analysis with the variational multiscale methods. J Adv Eng Comput 3:366–405. https://doi.org/10.25073/jaec.201932.245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hughes TJR, Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C (2020) Computational cardiovascular analysis with the variational multiscale methods and isogeometric discretization. In: Grama A, Sameh A (eds) Parallel algorithms in computational science and engineering. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43736-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Akkerman I, Dunaway J, Kvandal J, Spinks J, Bazilevs Y (2012) Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS. Comput Mech 50:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wu MCH, Kamensky D, Wang C, Herrema AJ, Xu F, Pigazzini MS, Verma A, Marsden AL, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C (2017) Optimizing fluid–structure interaction systems with immersogeometric analysis and surrogate modeling: application to a hydraulic arresting gear. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 316:668–693

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Yan J, Deng X, Xu F, Xu S, Zhu Q (2020) Numerical simulations of two back-to-back horizontal axis tidal stream turbines in free-surface flows. J Appl Mech. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Castorrini A, Corsini A, Rispoli F, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) A stabilized ALE method for computational fluid–structure interaction analysis of passive morphing in turbomachinery. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 29:967–994. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202519410057

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Yan J, Augier B, Korobenko A, Czarnowski J, Ketterman G, Bazilevs Y (2016) FSI modeling of a propulsion system based on compliant hydrofoils in a tandem configuration. Comput Fluids 141:201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Helgedagsrud TA, Bazilevs Y, Mathisen KM, Oiseth OA (2019) ALE-VMS methods for wind-resistant design of long-span bridges. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 191:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yan J, Korobenko A, Tejada-Martinez AE, Golshan R, Bazilevs Y (2017) A new variational multiscale formulation for stratified incompressible turbulent flows. Comput Fluids 158:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.12.004

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Ravensbergen M, Helgedagsrud TA, Bazilevs Y, Korobenko A (2020) A variational multiscale framework for atmospheric turbulent flows over complex environmental terrains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 368:113182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Xu F, Moutsanidis G, Kamensky D, Hsu M-C, Murugan M, Ghoshal A, Bazilevs Y (2017) Compressible flows on moving domains: stabilized methods, weakly enforced essential boundary conditions, sliding interfaces, and application to gas-turbine modeling. Comput Fluids 158:201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.02.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Wu MCH, Kuraishi T, Avsar R, Xu Z, Tezduyar TE (2021) Gas turbine computational flow and structure analysis with isogeometric discretization and a complex-geometry mesh generation method. Comput Mech 67:57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01919-w

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Codoni D, Moutsanidis G, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y, Johansen C, Korobenko A (2021) Stabilized methods for high-speed compressible flows: toward hypersonic simulations. Comput Mech 67:785–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01963-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Bayram AM, Korobenko A (2020) Variational multiscale framework for cavitating flows. Comput Mech 66:49–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01840-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Cen H, Zhou Q, Korobenko A (2021) Variational multiscale framework for cavitating flows. Comput Fluids 214:104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104765

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhu Q, Liu Z, Yan J (2021) Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networks. Comput Mech 67:619–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01952-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Xu S, Liu N, Yan J (2019) Residual-based variational multi-scale modeling for particle-laden gravity currents over flat and triangular wavy terrains. Comput Fluids 188:114–124

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Yan J, Yan W, Lin S, Wagner G (2018) A fully coupled finite element formulation for liquid–solid–gas thermo-fluid flow with melting and solidification. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 336:444–470

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Yan J, Lin SS, Bazilevs Y, Wagner G (2019) Isogeometric analysis of multi-phase flows with surface tension and with application to dynamics of rising bubbles. Comput Fluids 179:777–789

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhao Z, Zhu Q, Yan J (2021) A thermal multi-phase flow model for directed energy deposition processes via a moving signed distance function. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 373:113518

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhao Z, Yan J (2020) Variational multi-scale modeling of interfacial flows with a balanced-force surface tension model. Mech Res Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhu Q, Xu F, Xu S, Hsu M-C, Yan J (2020) An immersogeometric formulation for free-surface flows with application to marine engineering problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 361:112748

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhu Q, Yan J, Tejada-Martínez A, Bazilevs Y (2020) Variational multiscale modeling of Langmuir turbulent boundary layers in shallow water using isogeometric analysis. Mech Res Commun 108:103570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhu Q, Yan J (2021) A moving-domain CFD solver in FEniCS with applications to tidal turbine simulations in turbulent flows. Comput Math Appl 81:532–546

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Hsu M-C, Wang C, Xu F, Herrema AJ, Krishnamurthy A (2016) Direct immersogeometric fluid flow analysis using B-rep CAD models. Comput Aided Geom Des 43:143–158

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Xu S, Xu F, Kommajosula A, Hsu M-C, Ganapathysubramanian B (2019) Immersogeometric analysis of moving objects in incompressible flows. Comput Fluids 189:24–33

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Xu S, Gao B, Lofquist A, Fernando M, Hsu M-C, Sundar H, Ganapathysubramanian B (2020) An octree-based immersogeometric approach for modeling inertial migration of particles in channels. Comput Fluids 214:104764

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. Hsu M-C, Kamensky D, Xu F, Kiendl J, Wang C, Wu MCH, Mineroff J, Reali A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS (2015) Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models. Comput Mech 55:1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1166-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Kamensky D, Hsu M-C, Yu Y, Evans JA, Sacks MS, Hughes TJR (2017) Immersogeometric cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction analysis with divergence-conforming B-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 314:408–472

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Xu F, Morganti S, Zakerzadeh R, Kamensky D, Auricchio F, Reali A, Hughes TJR, Sacks MS, Hsu M-C (2018) A framework for designing patient-specific bioprosthetic heart valves using immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 34:e2938

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  83. Wu MCH, Zakerzadeh R, Kamensky D, Kiendl J, Sacks MS, Hsu M-C (2018) An anisotropic constitutive model for immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Biomech 74:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Wu MCH, Muchowski HM, Johnson EL, Rajanna MR, Hsu M-C (2019) Immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction modeling and simulation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 357:112556

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Johnson EL, Wu MCH, Xu F, Wiese NM, Rajanna MR, Herrema AJ, Ganapathysubramanian B, Hughes TJR, Sacks MS, Hsu M-C (2020) Thinner biological tissues induce leaflet flutter in aortic heart valve replacements. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117:19007–19016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Xu F, Johnson EL, Wang C, Jafari A, Yang C-H, Sacks MS, Krishnamurthy A, Hsu M-C (2021) Computational investigation of left ventricular hemodynamics following bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement. Mech Res Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Space–time finite element computation of complex fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1201–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2221

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K (2019) Space–time computations in practical engineering applications: a summary of the 25-year history. Comput Mech 63:747–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1620-7

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Takizawa K, Montes D, Fritze M, McIntyre S, Boben J, Tezduyar TE (2013) Methods for FSI modeling of spacecraft parachute dynamics and cover separation. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:307–338. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202513400058

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kolesar R (2015) FSI modeling of the Orion spacecraft drogue parachutes. Comput Mech 55:1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1108-z

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, McIntyre S, Kostov N, Kolesar R, Habluetzel C (2014) Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics. Comput Mech 53:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0888-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Otoguro Y, Mochizuki H, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2020) Space–time variational multiscale isogeometric analysis of a tsunami-shelter vertical-axis wind turbine. Comput Mech 66:1443–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01910-5

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Kuraishi T, Zhang F, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2021) Wind turbine wake computation with the ST-VMS method, isogeometric discretization and multidomain method: I. Computational framework. Comput Mech 68:113–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02022-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. Kuraishi T, Zhang F, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2021) Wind turbine wake computation with the ST-VMS method, isogeometric discretization and multidomain method: II. Spatial and temporal resolution. Comput Mech 68:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02025-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. Zhang F, Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2022) Wind turbine wake computation with the ST-VMS method and isogeometric discretization: directional preference in spatial refinement. Comput Mech 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02129-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  96. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust. Comput Mech 50:743–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0759-x

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. Takizawa K, Kostov N, Puntel A, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle. Comput Mech 50:761–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0758-y

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A (2015) Space–time computational analysis of MAV flapping-wing aerodynamics with wing clapping. Comput Mech 55:1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1095-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Long CC, Marsden AL, Schjodt K (2014) ST and ALE-VMS methods for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid mechanics modeling. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 24:2437–2486. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202514500250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. Takizawa K, Schjodt K, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Patient-specific computer modeling of blood flow in cerebral arteries with aneurysm and stent. Comput Mech 50:675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0760-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Takizawa K, Schjodt K, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2013) Patient-specific computational analysis of the influence of a stent on the unsteady flow in cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 51:1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0790-y

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  102. Suito H, Takizawa K, Huynh VQH, Sze D, Ueda T, Tezduyar TE (2016) A geometrical-characteristics study in patient-specific FSI analysis of blood flow in the thoracic aorta. In: Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K (eds) Advances in computational fluid–structure interaction and flow simulation: new methods and challenging computations. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40827-9_29

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  103. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Uchikawa H, Terahara T, Sasaki T, Shiozaki K, Yoshida A, Komiya K, Inoue G (2018) Aorta flow analysis and heart valve flow and structure analysis. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid–structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty—2018. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  104. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Uchikawa H, Terahara T, Sasaki T, Yoshida A (2019) Mesh refinement influence and cardiac-cycle flow periodicity in aorta flow analysis with isogeometric discretization. Comput Fluids 179:790–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.025

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. Terahara T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Tsushima A, Shiozaki K (2020) Ventricle-valve-aorta flow analysis with the space–time isogeometric discretization and topology change. Comput Mech 65:1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01822-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  106. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2016) New directions in space–time computational methods. In: Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K (eds) Advances in computational fluid–structure interaction and flow simulation: new methods and challenging computations. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  107. Terahara T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C (2020) Heart valve isogeometric sequentially-coupled FSI analysis with the space–time topology change method. Comput Mech 65:1167–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01813-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  108. Takizawa K, Terahara T, Tezduyar TE (2020) Space–time flow computation with contact between the moving solid surfaces. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  109. Takizawa K, Montes D, McIntyre S, Tezduyar TE (2013) Space–time VMS methods for modeling of incompressible flows at high Reynolds numbers. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:223–248. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218202513400022

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  110. Komiya K, Kanai T, Otoguro Y, Kaneko M, Hirota K, Zhang Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Nohmi M, Tsuneda T, Kawai M, Isono M (2019) Computational analysis of flow-driven string dynamics in a pump and residence time calculation. In: IOP conference series earth and environmental science, vol 240, pp 062014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/240/6/062014

  111. Kanai T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Komiya K, Kaneko M, Hirota K, Nohmi M, Tsuneda T, Kawai M, Isono M (2019) Methods for computation of flow-driven string dynamics in a pump and residence time. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 29:839–870. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021820251941001X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  112. Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) A general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method for complex geometries. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid–structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty—2018. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 399–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  113. Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Nagaoka K, Avsar R, Zhang Y (2019) Space–time VMS flow analysis of a turbocharger turbine with isogeometric discretization: computations with time-dependent and steady-inflow representations of the intake/exhaust cycle. Comput Mech 64:1403–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01722-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  114. Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2018) Space–time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact and tire deformation. In: Tezduyar TE (ed) Frontiers in computational fluid–structure interaction and flow simulation: research from lead investigators under forty—2018. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  115. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Kuraishi T (2020) Space–time computational FSI and flow analysis: 2004 and beyond. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  116. Kuraishi T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Space–time isogeometric flow analysis with built-in Reynolds-equation limit. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 29:871–904. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202519410021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  117. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Terahara T (2016) Ram-air parachute structural and fluid mechanics computations with the space–time isogeometric analysis (ST-IGA). Comput Fluids 141:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.05.027

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  118. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kanai T (2017) Porosity models and computational methods for compressible-flow aerodynamics of parachutes with geometric porosity. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 27:771–806. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202517500166

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  119. Kanai T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Tanaka T, Hartmann A (2019) Compressible-flow geometric-porosity modeling and spacecraft parachute computation with isogeometric discretization. Comput Mech 63:301–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1595-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  120. Aydinbakar L, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Matsuda D (2021) U-duct turbulent-flow computation with the ST-VMS method and isogeometric discretization. Comput Mech 67:823–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01965-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  121. Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26(10):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.237441

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  122. Aydinbakar L, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kuraishi T (2021) Space–time VMS isogeometric analysis of the Taylor–Couette flow. Comput Mech 67:1515–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02004-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  123. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA (1992) Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods: Space–time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations. In: New methods in transient analysis, PVP-Vol. 246/AMD-Vol. 143. ASME, New York, pp 7–24

  124. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Avsar R (2020) A low-distortion mesh moving method based on fiber-reinforced hyperelasticity and optimized zero-stress state. Comput Mech 65:1567–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01835-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  125. Tonon P, Sanches RAK, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2021) A linear-elasticity-based mesh moving method with no cycle-to-cycle accumulated distortion. Comput Mech 67:413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01941-y

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  126. Korobenko A, Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Computer modeling of wind turbines: 1. ALE-VMS and ST-VMS aerodynamic and FSI analysis. Arch Comput Methods Eng 26:1059–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9292-1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  127. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Hattori H (2017) Computational analysis of flow-driven string dynamics in turbomachinery. Comput Fluids 142:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.02.019

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  128. Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2017) Space–time VMS computational flow analysis with isogeometric discretization and a general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method. Comput Fluids 158:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.04.017

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  129. Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Nagaoka K, Mei S (2019) Turbocharger turbine and exhaust manifold flow computation with the space–time variational multiscale method and isogeometric analysis. Comput Fluids 179:764–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.019

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  130. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Asada S, Kuraishi T (2016) Space–time method for flow computations with slip interfaces and topology changes (ST-SI-TC). Comput Fluids 141:124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.05.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  131. Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S (1994) Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:157–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(94)00082-4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  132. Takizawa K (2014) Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space–time methods. Comput Mech 54:193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0999-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  133. Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  134. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2014) Space–time computation techniques with continuous representation in time (ST-C). Comput Mech 53:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0895-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  135. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Sasaki T (2018) Estimation of element-based zero-stress state in arterial FSI computations with isogeometric wall discretization. In: Wriggers P, Lenarz T (eds) Biomedical technology: modeling, experiments and simulation. Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59548-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  136. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Sasaki T (2017) Aorta modeling with the element-based zero-stress state and isogeometric discretization. Comput Mech 59:265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1344-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  137. Sasaki T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Medical-image-based aorta modeling with zero-stress-state estimation. Comput Mech 64:249–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01669-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  138. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Sasaki T (2019) Isogeometric hyperelastic shell analysis with out-of-plane deformation mapping. Comput Mech 63:681–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1616-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  139. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Benson DJ (2012) A computational procedure for pre-bending of wind turbine blades. Int J Numer Methods Eng 89:323–336

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  140. Bazilevs Y, Deng X, Korobenko A, di Scalea FL, Todd MD, Taylor SG (2015) Isogeometric fatigue damage prediction in large-scale composite structures driven by dynamic sensor data. J Appl Mech 82:091008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Kiendl J, Hsu M-C, Wu MCH, Reali A (2015) Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell formulations for general hyperelastic materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 291:280–303

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  142. Hsu M-C, Wang C, Herrema AJ, Schillinger D, Ghoshal A, Bazilevs Y (2015) An interactive geometry modeling and parametric design platform for isogeometric analysis. Comput Math Appl 70:1481–1500

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  143. Herrema AJ, Wiese NM, Darling CN, Ganapathysubramanian B, Krishnamurthy A, Hsu M-C (2017) A framework for parametric design optimization using isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 316:944–965

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  144. Benzaken J, Herrema AJ, Hsu M-C, Evans JA (2017) A rapid and efficient isogeometric design space exploration framework with application to structural mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 316:1215–1256

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  145. Kamensky D, Xu F, Lee C-H, Yan J, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C (2018) A contact formulation based on a volumetric potential: application to isogeometric simulations of atrioventricular valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:522–546

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  146. Herrema AJ, Johnson EL, Proserpio D, Wu MCH, Kiendl J, Hsu M-C (2019) Penalty coupling of non-matching isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell patches with application to composite wind turbine blades. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:810–840

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  147. Herrema AJ, Kiendl J, Hsu M-C (2019) A framework for isogeometric-analysis-based optimization of wind turbine blade structures. Wind Energy 22:153–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Johnson EL, Hsu M-C (2020) Isogeometric analysis of ice accretion on wind turbine blades. Comput Mech 66:311–322

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  149. Takizawa K, Fritze M, Montes D, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes with disreefing and modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 50:835–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0761-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Øiseth O, Mathisen KM, Kostov N, McIntyre S (2014) Engineering analysis and design with ALE-VMS and space–time methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng 21:481–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9113-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  151. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boswell C, Kolesar R, Montel K (2014) FSI modeling of the reefed stages and disreefing of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. Comput Mech 54:1203–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1052-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kolesar R, Boswell C, Kanai T, Montel K (2014) Multiscale methods for gore curvature calculations from FSI modeling of spacecraft parachutes. Comput Mech 54:1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1069-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  153. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boswell C, Tsutsui Y, Montel K (2015) Special methods for aerodynamic-moment calculations from parachute FSI modeling. Comput Mech 55:1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1074-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Takizawa K, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Torii R (2014) Estimation of element-based zero-stress state for arterial FSI computations. Comput Mech 54:895–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0919-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  155. Takizawa K, Torii R, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Xu XY (2014) Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates. Comput Mech 54:1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1049-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  156. Sasaki T, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Aorta zero-stress state modeling with T-spline discretization. Comput Mech 63:1315–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1651-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  157. Hughes TJR, Brooks AN (1979) A multi-dimensional upwind scheme with no crosswind diffusion. In: Hughes TJR (ed) Finite element methods for convection dominated flows, AMD-vol 34. ASME, New York, pp 19–35

  158. Tezduyar TE, Hughes TJR (1982) Development of time-accurate finite element techniques for first-order hyperbolic systems with particular emphasis on the compressible Euler equations. NASA Technical Report NASA-CR-204772, NASA. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/24313718/

  159. Tezduyar TE, Hughes TJR (1983) Finite element formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the compressible Euler equations. In: Proceedings of AIAA 21st aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA Paper 83-0125, Reno, Nevada. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-125

  160. Hughes TJR, Tezduyar TE (1984) Finite element methods for first-order hyperbolic systems with particular emphasis on the compressible Euler equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 45:217–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(84)90157-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  161. Hughes TJR, Mallet M, Mizukami A (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: II. Beyond SUPG. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 54:341–355

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  162. Tezduyar TE, Park YJ (1986) Discontinuity capturing finite element formulations for nonlinear convection–diffusion–reaction equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59:307–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(86)90003-4

  163. Tezduyar TE, Osawa Y (2000) Finite element stabilization parameters computed from element matrices and vectors. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:411–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00211-5

  164. Tezduyar TE (2001) Adaptive determination of the finite element stabilization parameters. In: Proceedings of the ECCOMAS computational fluid dynamics conference 2001 (CD-ROM), Swansea, Wales, UK

  165. Tezduyar TE (2004) Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Stein E, Borst RD, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, Volume 3: fluids, Chap. 17. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470091355.ecm069

  166. Takizawa K, Henicke B, Montes D, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:647–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0614-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  167. Castorrini A, Corsini A, Rispoli F, Venturini P, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2016) SUPG/PSPG computational analysis of rain erosion in wind-turbine blades. In: Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K (eds) Advances in computational fluid–structure interaction and flow simulation: new methods and challenging computations. Modeling and simulation in science, engineering and technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40827-9_7

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  168. Castorrini A, Corsini A, Rispoli F, Venturini P, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2019) Computational analysis of performance deterioration of a wind turbine blade strip subjected to environmental erosion. Comput Mech 64:1133–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01697-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  169. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Otoguro Y (2018) Stabilization and discontinuity-capturing parameters for space–time flow computations with finite element and isogeometric discretizations. Comput Mech 62:1169–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1557-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  170. Takizawa K, Ueda Y, Tezduyar TE (2019) A node-numbering-invariant directional length scale for simplex elements. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 29:2719–2753. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202519500581

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  171. Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2020) Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries. Comput Mech 65:1085-1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01809-w

  172. Ueda Y, Otoguro Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2020) Element-splitting-invariant local-length-scale calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 30:2139–2174. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202520500402

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Rice–Waseda research agreement and International Technology Center Indo-Pacific (ITC IPAC) Contract FA520921C0010. The work was also supported in part by ARO Grant W911NF-17-1-0046 and Contract W911NF-21-C-0030 (first and fourth authors), and Top Global University Project of Waseda University (fourth author). The tire geometry in Sect. 3.1 was provided by the YOKOHAMA RUBBER CO., LTD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering, Rice University – MS 321, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77005, USA

    Takashi Kuraishi & Tayfun E. Tezduyar

  2. Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Ookubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-8555, Japan

    Satoshi Yamasaki, Kenji Takizawa, Zhaojing Xu & Ryutaro Kaneko

  3. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Ookubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-8555, Japan

    Tayfun E. Tezduyar

Authors
  1. Takashi Kuraishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Satoshi Yamasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenji Takizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tayfun E. Tezduyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhaojing Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ryutaro Kaneko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Takizawa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuraishi, T., Yamasaki, S., Takizawa, K. et al. Space–time isogeometric analysis of car and tire aerodynamics with road contact and tire deformation and rotation. Comput Mech 70, 49–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02155-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02155-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation