Abstract
Magnetostrictive materials that couple mechanical and magnetic domains have been widely explored for use in sensors and actuators. These materials often exhibit a nonlinear material response under applied magnetic fields, which limits the use of linear constitutive models. Furthermore, the nonlinear constitutive relations tend to be implicit in nature. Hence, a finite element scheme that can handle the implicit relationship between the mechanical (stresses and strains) and magnetic (magnetic flux density and magnetic field) quantities is proposed in order to arrive at solutions to boundary value problems. In the proposed scheme, while the physical requirements of equilibrium and strain–displacement relation are satisfied point-wise, the constitutive relations hold in a weak integral sense. A fully coupled magnetostrictive plane stress rectangular element is developed based on the proposed scheme and its efficacy in arriving at solutions to coupled field boundary value problems is illustrated by subjecting the element to standard loading conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buschow KHJ, de Boer FR (2003) Magnetostrictive materials. Springer, Boston
Atulasimha J, Flatau AB (2011) A review of magnetostrictive iron-gallium alloys. Smart Mater Struct 20(4):043001
Deng Z, Dapino MJ (2017) Review of magnetostrictive vibration energy harvesters. Smart Mater Struct 26(10):103001
Moffett MB, Clark AE, Wun-Fogle M, Linberg J, Teter JP, McLaughlin EA (1991) Characterization of Terfenol-D for magnetostrictive transducers. J Acoust Soc Am 89(3):1448–1455
Carman GP, Mitrovic M (1995) Nonlinear constitutive relations for magnetostrictive materials with applications to 1-D problems. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 6(5):673–683
Wan Y, Fang D, Hwang KC (2003) Non-linear constitutive relations for magnetostrictive materials. Int J Non-Linear Mech 38(7):1053–1065
Duenas T, Hsu L, Cakman G (1996) Magnetostrictive composite material systems analytical/experimental. MRS Online Proc Library Archive 459
Zheng X et al (2005) A nonlinear constitutive model for magnetostrictive materials. Acta Mech Sin 21(3):278–285
Zheng XJ, Liu XE (2005) A nonlinear constitutive model for Terfenol-D rods. J Appl Phys 97(5):053901
Bhatti MA (2005) Fundamental finite element analysis and applications: with Mathematica and Matlab computations. Wiley, Hoboken
Reddy BD (2016) In: Schröder J, Wriggers P (eds) Functional analysis, boundary value problems and finite elements. Springer, Cham, pp 1–15
Bhatti MA (2006) Advanced topics in finite element analysis of structures: with Mathematica and MATLAB computations. Wiley, Hoboken
Wang J, Steinmann P (2013) Finite element simulation of the magneto-mechanical response of a magnetic shape memory alloy sample. Philos Mag 93(20):2630–2653
Rajagopal KR (2003) On implicit constitutive theories. Appl Math 48(4):279–319
Rajagopal K, Srinivasa A (2009) On a class of non-dissipative materials that are not hyperelastic. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 465(2102):493–500
Gokulnath C, Saravanan U, Rajagopal K (2017) Representations for implicit constitutive relations describing non-dissipative response of isotropic materials. Z Angew Math Phys 68(6):129
Shankar L, Rajthilak S, Saravanan U (2016) Numerical technique for solving truss and plane problems for a new class of elastic bodies. Acta Mech 227(11):3147–3176
Besbes M, Ren Z, Razek A (1996) Finite element analysis of magneto-mechanical coupled phenomena in magnetostrictive materials. IEEE Trans Magn 32(3):1058–1061
Kannan K, Dasgupta A (1997) A nonlinear Galerkin finite-element theory for modeling magnetostrictive smart structures. Smart Mater Struct 6(3):341
Besbes M, Ren Z, Razek A (2001) A generalized finite element model of magnetostriction phenomena. IEEE Trans Magn 37(5):3324–3328
Pérez-Aparicio JL, Sosa H (2004) A continuum three-dimensional, fully coupled, dynamic, non-linear finite element formulation for magnetostrictive materials. Smart Mater Struct 13(3):493
Gao Y, Zhang J (2011) The effective properties of three-dimensional giant magnetostrictive composites. J Appl Phys 110(11):114121
Zhou HM, Ou XW, Xiao Y, Qu SX, Wu HP (2013) An analytical nonlinear magnetoelectric coupling model of laminated composites under combined pre-stress and magnetic bias loadings. Smart Mater Struct 22(3):035018
Zhang S, Yao H, Gao Y (2017) A 2D mechanical-magneto-thermal model for direction-dependent magnetoelectric effect in laminates. J Magn Magn Mater 428:437–447
Do TA, Talleb H, Gensbittel A, Ren Z (2019) 3-D finite element analysis of magnetoelectric composites accounting for material nonlinearity and eddy currents. IEEE Trans Magn 55(10):1–8
Chakrabarti S, Dapino MJ (2011) Nonlinear finite element model for 3D Galfenol systems. Smart Mater Struct 20(10):105034
Deng Z, Dapino MJ (2015) Characterization and finite element modeling of Galfenol minor flux density loops. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26(1):47–55
Chakrabarti S, Dapino MJ (2012) Coupled axisymmetric finite element model of a hydraulically amplified magnetostrictive actuator for active powertrain mounts. Finite Elem Anal Des 60:25–34
Nocedal J, Wright S (2006) Numerical optimization. Springer, Berlin
Armstrong WD (1997) Magnetization and magnetostriction processes in Tb(0.27–0.30)Dy(0.73–0.70)Fe(1.9–2.0). J Appl Phys 81(5):2321–2326
Evans PG, Dapino MJ (2010) Efficient magnetic hysteresis model for field and stress application in magnetostrictive Galfenol. J Appl Phys 107(6):063906
Timošenko SP, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Code availability
The MATLAB\(^{\textregistered }\) codes implementing the proposed algorithm are provided as electronic supplementary material.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Saravanan thanks the financial support received from Science and Engineering Research Board under Grant MTR/2017/000350.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Appendix A: Shape function matrix for magnetic scalar potential \(\psi \)
The Lagrange shape functions assumed for the scalar potential, displacements and geometry are
The shape function matrix for the scalar potential and the [B] matrix for the magnetic field are thus given by
1.2 Appendix B: Shape function matrix for magnetic vector potential A
The shape functions for a non-conformal element are given as
Thus, the [B] matrix for the magnetic flux is thus given by
where \(\mathbf {T_1}=\begin{bmatrix} 1 &{} 0 &{} 0 \\ 0 &{} J_{11} &{} J_{21} \\ 0 &{} J_{12} &{} J_{22} \end{bmatrix}\) and \(\mathbf {0}\) is a null matrix of size 3 \(\times \) 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sudersan, S., Saravanan, U. & Arockiarajan, A. Finite element formulation for implicit magnetostrictive constitutive relations. Comput Mech 66, 1497–1514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01914-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01914-1