Advertisement

Computational Mechanics

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 1097–1113 | Cite as

A coupling peridynamic approach for the consolidation and dynamic analysis of saturated porous media

  • Hongwu ZhangEmail author
  • Hui Li
  • Hongfei Ye
  • Yonggang ZhengEmail author
Original Paper
  • 338 Downloads

Abstract

A coupling peridynamic approach is developed for the consolidation and dynamic analyses of saturated porous media. In this method, the coupling state-based peridynamic equations of solid skeleton and pore fluid are derived based on the u–p form governing equations. Then, the corresponding implicit incremental formulations are obtained according to the linearization method on the basis of the first-order Taylor’s expansion technique and the Newton–Raphson method. There are two advantages of the present implicit algorithm comparing with the explicit one. First, the former can handily deal well with various boundary conditions without setting up additional boundary layers. Next, the former is more reasonable and efficient to solve the consolidation problems whereas it often needs very small time step for the explicit peridynamic method combining with an additional damping under a quasi-static loading. Finally, both the consolidation and dynamic examples are given out and the results certify the validity and accuracy of the developed method by comparing it with the finite element method.

Keywords

Peridynamics Saturated porous media Dynamic problem Consolidation problem Implicit algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11672062, 11772082 and 11672063), the 111 Project (No. B08014) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biot MA (1941) General theory of three dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12:155–164CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biot MA (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in fluid saturated porous media. J Acoust Soc Am 28:168–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zienkiewicz OC, Shiomi T (1984) Dynamic behavior of saturated porous media: the generalized Biot formulation and its numerical solution. Int J Numer Anal Met 8:71–96CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zienkiewicz OC, Chan AHC, Pastor M, Paul DK, Shiomi T (1990) Static and dynamic behavior of soils; a rational approach to quantitative solution. I: fully saturated problems. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 429:285–309CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li XK, Zienkiewicz OC, Xie YM (1990) A numerical model for immiscible two-phase fluid flow in a porous medium and its time domain solution. Int J Numer Meth Eng 30:1195–1212CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewis RW, Schrefler BA (1998) The finite element method in the static and dynamic deformation and consolidation of porous media. Wiley, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li C, Borja RI, Regueiro RA (2004) Dynamics of porous media at finite strain. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293:3837–3870MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruben J (2005) A variational multiscale finite element method for multiphase flow in porous media. Finite Elem Anal Des 41:763–777MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li H, Zhang HW, Zheng YG (2015) A coupling extended multiscale finite element method for dynamic analysis of heterogeneous saturated porous media. Int J Numer Methods Eng 104:18–47MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang HW, Lu MK, Zheng YG, Zhang S (2015) General coupling extended multiscale FEM for elasto-plastic consolidation analysis of heterogeneous saturated porous media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39:63–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chi SW, Siriaksorn T, Lin SP (2017) Von Neumann stability analysis of the u–p reproducing kernel formulation for saturated porous media. Comput Mech 59:335–357MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schrefler BA, Scotta R (2001) A fully coupled dynamic model for two-phase fluid flow in deformable porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3223:3223–3246CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paola D, Zingales M (2008) Long-range cohesive interactions of non-local continuum faced by fractional calculus. Int J Solids Struct 45:5642–5659CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paola D, Marino F, Zingales M (2009) A generalized model of elastic foundation based on long-range interactions: integral and fractional model. Int J Solids Struct 46:3124–3137CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Polizzotto C (2001) Nonlocal elasticity and related variational principles. Int J Solids Struct 38:7359–7380MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sen M, Yang KT (1989) An inflow-outflow characterization of inhomogeneous permeable beds. Transp Porous Med 4:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sen M, Ramos E (2012) A spatially non-local model for flow in porous media. Transp Porous Med 92:29–39MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berkowitz B, Cortis A, Dentz M, Scher H (2006) Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Rev Geophys 44:RG2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seleson P, Parks ML, Gunzburger M, Lehoucq RB (2009) Peridynamics as an upscaling of molecular dynamics. Multiscale Model Simul 8:204–227MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H (2010) A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2437–2455CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48:175–209MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Silling SA, Epton M, Wechner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88:151–184MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silling SA, Bobaru F (2005) Peridynamic modeling of membranes and fibers. Int J Non-Linear Mech 40:395–409CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bobaru F, Silling SA (2004) Peridynamic 3D problems of nanofiber networks and carbon nanotube-reinforced composites. AIP Conf Proc 712:1565–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hu W, Ha YD, Bobaru F (2012) Peridynanic model for dynamic fracture in unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217–220:247–261CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gerstle W, Sau N, Silling SA (2007) Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nucl Eng Des 237:1250–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oterkus S, Madenci E (2017) Peridynamic modeling of fuel pellet cracking. Eng Fract Mech 176:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li H, Zhang HW, Zheng YG, Zhang L (2016) A peridynamic model for the nonlinear static analysis of truss and tensegrity structures. Comput Mech 57:843–858MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li H, Zhang HW, Zheng YG, Lu MK (2018) An implicit coupling finite element and peridynanic method for dynamic problems of solids mechanics with crack propagation. Int J Appl Mech 10:1850037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ren HL, Zhuang XY, Cai YC, Rabczuk R (2016) Dual-horizon peridynamics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 108:1451–1476MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turner DZ (2013) A non-local model for fluid-structure interaction with application in hydraulic frcturing. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 14:391–400MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Katiyar A, Foster JT, Ouchi H, Sharma MM (2014) A peridynamic formulation of pressure driven convective fluid transport in porous media. J Comput Phys 261:209–229MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lai X, Ren B, Fan HF, Li SF, Wu CT, Regueiro RA, Liu LS (2015) Peridynamics simulations of geomaterial fragmentation by impulse loads. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 39:1304–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fan HF, Li SF (2017) Parallel peridynamics-SPH simulation of explosion induced soil fragmentation by using OpenMP. Comput Part Mech 4:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oterkus S, Madenci E, Oterkus E (2017) Fully coupled poroelastic peridynamic formulation for fluid-filled fractures. Eng Geol 225:19–28CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83:1526–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leon SE, Paulino GH, Pereira A, Menezes IFM, Lages EN (2012) A unified library of nonlinear solution schemes. Appl Mech Rev 64:040803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang HF (2000) Theory of linear poroelasticity with applications to geomechanics and hydrogeology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Research Center for Computational Mechanics, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Faculty of Vehicle Engineering and MechanicsDalian University of TechnologyDalianPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations