Advertisement

Computational Mechanics

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 351–370 | Cite as

The total and updated lagrangian formulations of state-based peridynamics

  • Guy L. Bergel
  • Shaofan LiEmail author
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

The peridynamics theory is a reformulation of nonlocal continuum mechanics that incorporates material particle interactions at finite distances into the equation of motion. State-based peridynamics is an extension of the original bond-based peridynamics theory wherein the response of an individual particle depends collectively on its interaction with neighboring particles through the concept of state variables. In this paper, the more recent non-ordinary state-based Peridynamics formulations of both the total (referential) Lagrangian approach as well as the updated (spatial) Lagrangian approach are formulated. In doing so, relations of the state variables are defined through various nonlocal differential operators in both material and spatial configurations in the context of finite deformation. Moreover, these nonlocal differential operators are mathematically and numerically shown to converge to the local differential operators, and they are applied to derive new force states and deformation gradients.

Keywords

Continuum mechanics Deformation gradient Finite elasticity Nonlocal theory State-based peridynamics Updated Lagrangian 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the ONR MURI Grant N00014-11-1-0691, which is gratefully acknowledged. Dr. Houfu Fan calculated the second numerical example.

References

  1. 1.
    Agwai A, Guven I, Madenci E (2011) Predicting crack propagation with peridynamics: a comparative study. Int J Fract 171(1):65–78CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bathe KJ (2008) Finite element method. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B, Elkhodary K (2013) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bessa MA, Foster JT, Belytschko T, Liu WK (2014) A meshfree unification: reproducing kernel peridynamics. Comput Mech 53:1251–1264MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bobaru F, Ha Y, Hu W (2012) Damage progression from impact in layered glass modeled with peridynamics. Open Eng 2(4):551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bobaru F, Duangpanya M (2011) A peridynamic formulation for transient heat conduction in bodies with evolving discontinuities. J Comput Phys 231:2764–2785MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Du Q, Gunzberger M, Lehoucq RB, Zhou K (2013) A nonlocal vector calculus, nonlocal volume-constrained problems, and nonlocal balance laws. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23(3):493–540MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Du Q, Gunzberger M, Lehoucq RB, Zhou K (2013) Analysis of the volume-constrained peridynamic Navier equation of linear elasticity. J Elast 113:193–217MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ericksen JL (2008) On the Cauchy-Born rule. Math Mech Solids 13(3–4):199–220MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finnis MW, Sinclair JE (1984) A simple empirical N-body potential for transition metals. Philos Mag A 50(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foster JT, Silling SA, Chen WW (2010) Viscoplasticity using peridynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81(10):1242–1258zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garboczi EJ (1987) Cauchy relations for central-force random networks. Phys Rev B 36:2115–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerstle W, Sau N, Silling S (2007) Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nucl Eng Des 237(12):1250–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gunzburger M, Lehoucq RB (2010) A nonlocal vector calculus with application to nonlocal boundary value problems. Multiscale Model Simul 8(5):1581–1598MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ha YD, Bobaru F (2010) Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. Int J Fract 162(1–2):229–244CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kilic B, Madenci E (2010) An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory. Theor Appl Fract Mech 53:194–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li S, Ren B, Minaki H (2014) ‘Multiscale crystal defect dynamics: a dual-lattice process zone model. Philos Mag 94:1414–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li S, Liu WK (2004) Meshfree particle methods. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lipton R (2014) Dynamic brittle fracture as a small horizon limit of peridynamics. J Elast 117(1):21–50MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu WK, Jun S, Li S, Adee J, Belytschko T (1995) Reproducing kernel particle methods for structural dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38(10):1655–1679MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madenci E, Oterkus E (2014) Peridynamic theory and its applications. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mengesha T, Du Q (2014) Nonlocal constrained value problems for a linear peridynamic Navier equation. J Elast 115(1):27–51MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ren B, Houfu F, Bergel GL, Regueiro RA, Lai X, Li S (2014) A peridynamics-SPH coupling approach to simulate soil fragmentation induced by shock waves. Comput Mech 55:287–302MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48:175–209MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamics states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88:151–184MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silling SA, Bobaru F (2005) Peridynamics modeling of membranes and fibers. Int J Non-Linear Mech 40:395–409CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2008) Convergence of peridynamics to classical elasticity theory. J Elast 93:13–37MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2010) Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics. Adv Appl Mech 44(1):73–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tian X, Du Q (2013) Analysis and comparison of different approximations to nonlocal diffusion and linear peridynamic equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 51(6):3458–3482MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tupek MR, Radovitzky R (2014) An extended constitutive correspondence formulation of peridynamics based on nonlinear bond-strain measures. J Mech Phys Solids 65:82–92MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zeng X, Li S (2010) A multiscale cohesive zone model and simulations of fractures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(9):547–556MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations