Skip to main content
Log in

A 3D time domain numerical model based on half-space Green’s function for soil–structure interaction analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 May 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical method based on a three dimensional boundary element–finite element (BEM–FEM) coupled formulation in the time domain. The proposed model allows studying soil–structure interaction problems. The soil is modelled with the BEM, where the radiation condition is implicitly satisfied in the fundamental solution. Half-space Green’s function including internal soil damping is considered as the fundamental solution. An effective treatment based on the integration into a complex Jordan path is proposed to avoid the singularities at the arrival time of the Rayleigh waves. The efficiency of the BEM is improved taking into account the spatial symmetry and the invariance of the fundamental solution when it is expressed in a dimensionless form. The FEM is used to represent the structure. The proposed method is validated by comparison with analytical solutions and numerical results presented in the literature. Finally, a soil–structure interaction problem concerning with a building subjected to different incident wave fields is studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 17 May 2019

    In the original publication of the article, the second author���s name was missed.

  • 17 May 2019

    In the original publication of the article, the second author���s name was missed.

References

  1. Araújo FC, Mansur WJ, Nishikava LK (1999) Linear \(\theta \) time-marching algorithm in 3D BEM formulation for elastodynamics. Eng Anal Bound Elem 23(10):825–833

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber JR (1996) Surface displacements due to a steadily moving point force. Trans ASME J Appl Mech 63(2):245–250

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bode C, Hirschauer R, Savidis SA (2002) Soil–structure interaction in the time domain using halfspace Green’s functions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(4):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chao CC (1960) Dynamical response of an elastic half-space to tangential surface loadings. J Appl Mech ASME 27(3):559–567

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough RW, Penzien J (1975) Dynamic of structures. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clouteau D, Cottereau R, Lombaert G (2013) Dynamics of structures coupled with elastic media—a review of numerical models and methods. J Sound Vib 332(10):2415–2436

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ditzel A, Herman GC, Drijkoningen GG (2001) Seismograms of moving trains: a comparison of theory and measurements. J Sound Vib 248(4):635–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Domínguez J (1993) Boundary elements in dynamics. Computational Mechanics Publications and Elsevier Aplied Science, Southampton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Eringen AC, Suhubi ES (1975) Elastodynamics, linear theory, vol 2. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galvín P, Domínguez J (2007) Analysis of ground motion due to moving surface loads induced by high-speed trains. Eng Anal Bound Elem 31(11):931–941

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Galvín P, Romero A, Domínguez J (2010) Fully three-dimensional analysis of high-speed train–track–soil–structure dynamic interaction. J Sound Vib 329(24):5147–5163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Galvín P, Romero A (2014) A MATLAB toolbox for soil–structure interaction analysis with finite and boundary elements. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 57:10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heidebrcht C, Stafford-Smith B (1973) Approximate analysis of tall wall-frame structures. Struct Div 99:199–221

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson LR (1974) Green’s function for Lamb’s problem. Geophys J R Astron Soc 37(1):99–131

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kausel E (2010) Early history of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(9):822–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kausel E (2013) Lamb’s problem at its simplest. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 469(2149):20120462

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mantic V (1993) A new formula for the C-matrix in the Somigliana identity. J Elast 33(3):191–201

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Marrero M, Domínguez J (2003) Numerical behavior of time domain BEM for three-dimensional transient elastodynamic problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem 27(1):39–48

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mooney HM (1974) Some numerical solutions for Lamb’s problem. Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(2):473–491

    Google Scholar 

  20. Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. ASCE J Eng Mech Div 85(1):67–94

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oliveto G, Santini A (1992) A simplified model for the dynamic soil–structure interaction of planar frame-wall systems. Eng Struct 15:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pekeris CL (1955) The seismic surface pulse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 41:469–480

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rizos DC, Karabalis DL (1994) An advanced direct time domain BEM formulation for general 3-D elastodynamic problems. Comput Mech 15(3):249–269

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Rizos DC, Karabalis DL (1998) A time domain BEM for 3-D elastodynamic analysis using the B-spline fundamental solutions. Comput Mech 22(1):108–115

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Romero A, Galvín P, Domínguez J (2013) 3D non-linear time domain FEM–BEM approach to soil–structure interaction problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem 37(3):501–512

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Schanz M (1999) A boundary element formulation in time domain for viscoelastic solids. Commun Numer Methods Eng 15(11):799–809

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Triantafyllidis T (1991) 3-D time domain BEM using half-space Green’s functions. Eng Anal Bound Elem 8(3):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil–structure interaction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (1967) The basis. The finite element method, vol I. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) through research project BIA2010-14843. Financial support is gratefully acknowledged. The support given by the Andalusian Scientific Computing Centre (CICA) is also gratefully.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Galvín.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galvín, P., Romero, A. A 3D time domain numerical model based on half-space Green’s function for soil–structure interaction analysis. Comput Mech 53, 1073–1085 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0949-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0949-1

Keywords

Navigation